worst console port in the HISTORY of gaming, game is fun and multipleyer is good but why,why,why this crap looks even better on xbox 360 WTF are you nutz cevat yerli
what is this please good have little mercy for as pc gamers!!

It does not look better on 360. In the Beta Sandbox you could select presets like high, very high, xbox and PS3.

Objects appear much later in Xbox360 version.

Of course the levels are built so you dont notice this but draw distance is much much worse on Xbox360. So is lighting, shadow resolution.

I think Crytek is going through a hard time right now but still - if you cant bring it, dont open your mouth. I hope they will patch all the extra-PC stuff later on, otherwise Crytek will loose lots of it's PC-DEV Charme they had after Crysis 1.

if you cant bring it, dont open your mouth. I hope they will patch all the extra-PC stuff later on, otherwise Crytek will loose lots of it's PC-DEV Charme they had after Crysis 1.


Word

you don't understand of course is look beter on pc but is similar to xbox360, don't forget it is 5 year old hardware.

you don't understand of course is look beter on pc but is similar to xbox360, don't forget it is 5 year old hardware.

I can assure you we all understand this perfectly well. If it was new console hardware then the console and PC looking the same would be ok..

There will definitely be tons of hate and flaming from the masses after the 25th. Whether Crytek will give a **** or not I don't know. When last did Crytek staff themselves even post on these forums? At least DICE take time to sometimes post on the BF3 forums.

What wonders me most is that there is no setting for AntiAliasing? It is the very first setting that i reduce, if my fps isn't good enough. Now you have to tweak it through console. And where is AF setting? You can allways force it through drivers, but it would be much more easier if you can do it in game. By the way Willerts, can you test if AF works? Post some acreenshots whit and whitout AF.

Anyways i tweak this game via console, so above thinks arent so much an issue to me but for many them are. I think most of who's going to buy this game, don't know how to use console or they simply don't want to do that. They want hassle free, easy settings to get most out of their hardware and making game to look like they want. If they want play this game on Extreme settings, they are plagued of that horrible blurAA that i mentioned earlier and there is no other way but console to set it off. How do think that kind of players are going to react in to it? They are RAGED!

Those settings Crytek is offering us are a BIG JOKE!

What wonders me most is that there is no setting for AntiAliasing? It is the very first setting that i reduce, if my fps isn't good enough. Now you have to tweak it through console. And where is AF setting? You can allways force it through drivers, but it would be much more easier if you can do it in game. By the way Willerts, can you test if AF works? Post some acreenshots whit and whitout AF.

Anyways i tweak this game via console, so above thinks arent so much an issue to me but for many them are. I think most of who's going to buy this game, don't know how to use console or they simply don't want to do that. They want hassle free, easy settings to get most out of their hardware and making game to look like they want. If they want play this game on Extreme settings, they are plagued of that horrible blurAA and there is no other way but console to set it off. How do think that kind of players are going to react in to it? They are RAGED!

Those settings Crytek is offering us are a BIG JOKE!

Actually, there is no hardware based MSAA in Crysis 2. It uses software based methods to eliminate jagged edges as best it can. This is due to the lighting method used in CE3 (deferred lighting). Using hardware based MSAA simply wasn't a viable option.

This AA method has little impact on performance.

Actually, there is no hardware based MSAA in Crysis 2. It uses software based methods to eliminate jagged edges as best it can. This is due to the lighting method used in CE3 (deferred lighting). Using hardware based MSAA simply wasn't a viable option.

This AA method has little impact on performance.

And big impact to make game look like crap! I rather play this whitout anykind of AA if thats the only option. http://h-4.abload.de/img/3extremesp50.jpg And it looks even worse when you are moving.

That blur just makes me womit! I hope it's possible to use traditional AA. 2xAA is more than enough for me.

Don't worry Crytek. I pre-ordered... but Crysis2 is MAXIMUM CONSOLE.

Crytek totally sold out........!

More pictures!

More pictures!

Can someone re-upload them to tinypic for convenience?

More pictures!

Yes please

i uploaded them:

high: http://www.abload.de/img/1highztmy.png
very high: http://www.abload.de/img/2veryhighsrgw.png
extreme: http://www.abload.de/img/extreme1s6p.png

no differnece except for the trees again

i uploaded them:

high: http://www.abload.de/img/1highztmy.png
very high: http://www.abload.de/img/2veryhighsrgw.png
extreme: http://www.abload.de/img/extreme1s6p.png

no differnece except for the trees again

I think trees look best in mdium.

The graphics settings are embarrassing. Why is it so hard to implement a graphics system like.......................................................... EVERY OTHER PC GAME EVER MADE. This is freaking Crysis ffs. We know it can be implemented, there is literally no excuse its not in the game. Its a blatant slap in the face to every PC gamer and/or sheer laziness on your part.

Guess what Crytek? We're going to adjust the graphics the way we like it, REGARDLESS of what arbitrary limitations you put on us. I think this community is not being vocal enough when it comes to this issue. Your game is becoming a joke because of poor decisions like this.

You do not deserve my 60$.This is a shame!
In few words: CRYSIS 2 svckS!
+1

"no differnece except for the trees again"


Thats because assets like trees are duplicated hundreds of times throughout the game.

i uploaded them:

high: http://www.abload.de/img/1highztmy.png
very high: http://www.abload.de/img/2veryhighsrgw.png
extreme: http://www.abload.de/img/extreme1s6p.png

There are no hi-res textures even at extreme. That is a shame..

the broken concrete in the foreground looks very low polygon. Thats gonna get annoying because there looks like being alot of it. I always wonder why Dev's try and make stuff like this it always looks terrible. Now with tessellation, then it might work and be something nobody ever saw before in a game.

Theres difference, but mainly on view distance and amount of objects vicible. There is actually very little difference on trees. Trees look different becasuse of that blurAA. It makes them look bit more lush but thats it. Shadows look much better on VeryHigh.

i uploaded them:

high: http://www.abload.de/img/1highztmy.png
very high: http://www.abload.de/img/2veryhighsrgw.png
extreme: http://www.abload.de/img/extreme1s6p.png

no differnece except for the trees again
And the trees and lighting look beter on medium(verry high) thats strange

look at the wheel of car on left side - it`s better - think some textures are better in extreme, not all.

Guy Thinks He's Playing In DX11 On The Leaked PC Version.....
I Don't Know....But What Ever He Did The Graphics Look Pretty Amazing

http://www.gamesas.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=9668&start=130

Link On This^ Link

Guy Thinks He's Playing In DX11 On The Leaked PC Version.....
I Don't Know....But What Ever He Did The Graphics Look Pretty Amazing

http://www.gamesas.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=9668&start=130

Link On This^ Link

Please wake up..
DX11? u drunk?