Revelation about the Civil War

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 1:37 pm

No side has any advantages over the other. Both sides are exactly the same except for names, faces, and attire.

Both sides fight for dominance in Skyrim.

Both sides revel in killing the other.

Both sides replace the jarls of enemy holds with whomever will obey them(even with criminals, like the Black-Briars and the Silver-Bloods)

Both sides resort to blackmail and thievery.(Riften & Markarth)

Both sides make accusations of crimes against the other.

Both sides will eventually lead to a supremacist movement or Ethnic cleansing in Skyrim(for the Empire, it's the Thalmor wanting High Elf supremacy. For the Stormcloaks, it's them wanting Nord supremacy)

Even the quests are all the same. Same goals, different locations.

And the Thalmor don't want either side to win. The continuing conflict keeps both sides weakened and vulnerable, but either side winning means both sides will be able to marshal their strength and would probably ally against the Thalmor later despite differences(the enemy of my enemy is my friend.)

So all the debating over which side is more legitimate than the other is completely pointless. Both sides have the same qualities and faults with a different face. Only difference is whether you prefer to wear leather or a bear's head.
User avatar
Kristian Perez
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:03 am

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 5:24 pm

It's a lore argument. The game portrays the two in an utterly terrible and shallow pile of [censored].

Apparently they had good intentions with the Civil War but cut a lot of content because of the release date. What can you do...
To call it a main feature of the game is a disgrace.
User avatar
Tha King o Geekz
 
Posts: 3556
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 9:14 pm

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:10 pm

There is a difference though. The Empire's army is bigger. Apart from that and tactics not shown in game due to AI you're pretty much spot on.
User avatar
Brittany Abner
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:48 pm

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:09 am

Well the civil war is grey there is no "right" side its a simple war of ideals with the common citizens getting stuck in the middle. I prefer to be neutral personally.

I generally agree with you OP but knowing these forums there will be people who disagree with you.
User avatar
Kaley X
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 5:46 pm

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 5:35 am

Actually, the Legion fights for dominance, the Stormcloaks fight for freedom. And also Thongvor doesn't actually do any criminal acts, while Maven does and threatens to get the Dark Brotherhood to assassinate their leader (Maven has been sipping Skooma)
User avatar
cosmo valerga
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:21 am

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:00 am

There are many big lore differences, but I won't be the first to open that inferno.
User avatar
michael danso
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 9:21 am

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:18 am

Actually, the Legion fights for dominance, the Stormcloaks fight for freedom. And also Thongvor doesn't actually do any criminal acts, while Maven does and threatens to get the Dark Brotherhood to assassinate their leader (Maven has been sipping Skooma)

The Stormcloaks fight to put a loathsome dog like Ulfric on the throne while being a total tool for the Thalmor, while the Empire is trying desperately to keep the lands unified for the imminent next war.
User avatar
Laura Shipley
 
Posts: 3564
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:47 am

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 7:53 am

Actually, the Legion fights for dominance, the Stormcloaks fight for freedom. And also Thongvor doesn't actually do any criminal acts, while Maven does and threatens to get the Dark Brotherhood to assassinate their leader (Maven has been sipping Skooma)
They can say they fight for freedom all day long. When it gets down to it someone has to lead Skyrim and the winning party will do so. No one is ever truly free, someone must always be in charge and as long as this fact stands there will always be people to challenge said rule and fight for "freedom".
User avatar
Jake Easom
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 4:33 am

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 7:21 am

I agree with all of your points, but you're at least partly mixing gameplay and lore. A player may want to take a side for the story, rather than just the gameplay elements.

If the Stormcloaks win, they'll be free to worship Talos again. The Empire will definitely be weakened. It will likely also increase general hardship in Skyrim, because several NPCs make comments about the Empire providing food and supplies. This may just be short term, though.

If the Empire wins, it gives them more resources to fight the Thalmor, and helps them maintain stability, though with the Emperor's death, who knows?

Also, there are other issues, such as who would be better for Skyrim, Elisif or Ulfric? And who will be better 20 years from now?
User avatar
Jessica Thomson
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 5:10 am

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 12:24 pm

The Stormcloaks fight to put a loathsome dog like Ulfric on the throne while being a total tool for the Thalmor, while the Empire is trying desperately to keep the lands unified for the imminent next war.
Here we go.....

Has anyone in the civil war topics ever heard of the definition of insanity?
User avatar
Prue
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:27 am

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:19 pm

It's a lore argument. The game portrays the two in an utterly terrible and shallow pile of [censored].

Apparently they had good intentions with the Civil War but cut a lot of content because of the release date. What can you do...
To call it a main feature of the game is a disgrace.

I listed lore reasons as well.

Lore:

Imperials want to maintain their Sovereignty over Skyrim. = Stormcloaks want to establish their Sovereigty over Skyrim

Imperials are allied with the Thalmor, who want to establish elven supremacy in Tamriel. = Stormcloaks want to establish Nord supremacy in Tamriel.(Even Galmar says Skyrim's independence is only the first step of their plans. They want to march on the Empire and Dominion next.)

Imperials show prejudice against the Nords by taking away their right to worship Talos and persecute anyone who does. = Stormcloaks show prejudice against all the other races by treating them like second class citizens.
User avatar
Veronica Flores
 
Posts: 3308
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 5:26 pm

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 1:59 pm

Ummmm you realize you just posted this in the civil war discussion forum right? Every thing you said pretty accurate, but people will always feel compelled to defend their point view on the civil war. Why? Well because people think Ulfric is super neat and the empire is mans only hope.
User avatar
Nicole M
 
Posts: 3501
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:31 am

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 1:25 am

Well the civil war is grey there is no "right" side its a simple war of ideals with the common citizens getting stuck in the middle. I prefer to be neutral personally.

I generally agree with you OP but knowing these forums there will be people who disagree with you.


I feel the same way. However the cold dark truth is: "Neutrality only helps the oppressor, never the oppressed" A side must be chosen to end the civil war unfortunately. It's basically choosing one of the two evils.
User avatar
Valerie Marie
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:29 am

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 3:06 am

The Stormcloaks fight to put a loathsome dog like Ulfric on the throne while being a total tool for the Thalmor, while the Empire is trying desperately to keep the lands unified for the imminent next war.
Tool for the Thalmor,yet it's the Empire who put them into Skyrim in the first place and is helping destory Mundus. Yeah..tool...
User avatar
Timara White
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:39 am

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:07 am

I listed lore reasons as well.

Lore:

Imperials want to maintain their Sovereignty over Skyrim. = Stormcloaks want to establish their Sovereigty over Skyrim

Imperials are allied with the Thalmor, who want to establish elven supremacy in Tamriel. = Stormcloaks want to establish Nord supremacy in Tamriel.(Even Galmar says Skyrim's independence is only the first step of their plans. They want to march on the Empire and Dominion next.)

Imperials show prejudice against the Nords by taking away their right to worship Talos and persecute anyone who does. = Stormcloaks show prejudice against all the other races by treating them like second class citizens.

Only lore that is stated in game, which was very little. Also the Imperials aren't allied with the Thalmor. It's a peace treaty, not an alliance.
User avatar
Tom
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 7:39 pm

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 1:31 pm

http://hdclarity.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Yoda-Flame-war-begun1.jpg
User avatar
Chloe Lou
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:08 am

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:08 am

Actually, the Legion fights for dominance, the Stormcloaks fight for freedom. And also Thongvor doesn't actually do any criminal acts, while Maven does and threatens to get the Dark Brotherhood to assassinate their leader (Maven has been sipping Skooma)

Ulfric's vision of a free Skyrim only counts if he is in charge.

Talk to Sybille Stentor. She helped to raise Torygg since he was a child and knew him inside and out. And states that he deeply respected Ulfric and probably would have separated from the Empire if he had asked him to do it. And even Elisif's favor quest proves that Torygg was a Talos worshipper in secret.

But Ulfric however believed Torygg was a milk-drinker and an imperial puppet who only cared about pleasing his woman.
User avatar
Shaylee Shaw
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:55 pm

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:55 pm

Ulfric's vision of a free Skyrim only counts if he is in charge.

Talk to Sybille Stentor. She helped to raise Torygg since he was a child and knew him inside and out. And states that he deeply respected Ulfric and probably would have separated from the Empire if he had asked him to do it. And even Elisif's favor quest proves that Torygg was a Talos worshipper in secret.

But Ulfric however believed Torygg was a milk-drinker and an imperial puppet who only cared about pleasing his woman.
Talk to Torygg in Sovngarde and then tell me he wasn't a milk-drinker.
User avatar
Jake Easom
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 4:33 am

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 5:11 pm

I feel the same way. However the cold dark truth is: "Neutrality only helps the oppressor, never the oppressed" A side must be chosen to end the civil war unfortunately. It's basically choosing one of the two evils.
Well my duty is stop a black dragon from eating/enslaving the world not help stop a war between nords and the empire. I don't even live in the empire or skyrim I live in morrowind!

If they wanna kill each other while the thalmor are dancing in the background? Be my guest. Not interested. If that helps the oppressor I don't care at the end of the day everyone is a bastard looking out for their own agenda the empire, ulfric and his stormcloaks and the thalmor I am tired of it my character is tired of being used for other peoples political games and battles.


As Boethiah pretty much said to my altmer live for myself and rely only on myself.
User avatar
Carolyne Bolt
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:56 am

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:42 am

Here we go..... Has anyone in the civil war topics ever heard of the definition of insanity?

:lmao: Vaas would not take kindly to the CW threads.
User avatar
StunnaLiike FiiFii
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:30 am

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 12:46 pm

Only lore that is stated in game, which was very little. Also the Imperials aren't allied with the Thalmor. It's a peace treaty, not an alliance.

They give the Thalmor the right to be the Talos Police in Skyrim. They allow them to capture, torture, and kill anyone they want and General Tullius willingly turns a blind eye to it(case in point: His missive to Idolaf Battle-Born about Thorald Gray-Mane.)

The Empire's idea of saving itself is by maintaining peace with the Thalmor, which is more or less an alliance.
User avatar
Darlene Delk
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 3:48 am

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 1:02 pm

Talk to Torygg in Sovngarde and then tell me he wasn't a milk-drinker.

You don't listern very well.

I said Ulfric believed it. Not me.
User avatar
Amy Gibson
 
Posts: 3540
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:11 pm

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 12:35 pm

You don't listern very well.

I said Ulfric believed it. Not me.
And neither do you.
I said he IS a milk-drinker, I didn't say you said it.
And then I told you to go to Sovngarde and talk to him. He's a coward.
User avatar
Maya Maya
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:35 pm

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 12:27 pm


Well my duty is stop a black dragon from eating the world not help stop a war between nords and the empire. I don't even live in the empire or skyrim I live in morrowind!

If they wanna kill each other while the thalmor are dancing in the background? Be my guest. Not interested.
This. Oh and imagine the thalmor square dancing.....go ahead I laughed.
User avatar
Eddie Howe
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 6:06 am

Post » Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:50 am

They give the Thalmor the right to be the Talos Police in Skyrim. They allow them to capture, torture, and kill anyone they want and General Tullius willingly turns a blind eye to it(case in point: His missive to Idolaf Battle-Born about Thorald Gray-Mane.)

The Empire's idea of saving itself is by maintaining peace with the Thalmor, which is more or less an alliance.

I'm not arguing lore or anything like that. It's just not an alliance. They're complying with the ridiculous Peace Treaty, not running over with arms wide open for a hug.

It seems like an alliance because they essentially put whatever they wanted in the treaty because they knew the empire needed peace. Whether they were bluffing about their strength or not is skewed, but the Empire couldn't negotiate anything.
User avatar
Daniel Lozano
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 7:42 am

Next

Return to V - Skyrim