Glad to see Fallout 4 doing so well with reviews.

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/fallout-4-review-roundup/1100-6432112/

It is - a solid 9 aggregate.

If you had pre-ordered and thought it would be excellent, that's vindication.

If you thought it svcked, the score won't change your mind and you and you will still prefer TW3/MGS etc.

So it's a win all round

Ars Technica's review was harsher than others I've seen, I felt like the reviewer was a fish out of water and was playing a game that just wasn't his thing.

This one caught my eye in particular (sorry, I just copy and pasted because laziness):

I know opinions will be opinions, but this sounds like "Bethesda writing" all over again. Which really wouldn't be surprising anyway.

Damn these reviews are worrying me. No spoilers yet I'll have it tonight. Here's hoping I get all I want and more out of fallout like I usually do and it's just people reading far too deeply into it.

Don't let reviews worry you my friend. These "professional" reviewers are really no different from a dude sitting on his second hand couch eating Doritos in that his review is as good as theirs.

Many reviews indicate what I thought, Power Armor is somewhat of a chore in a potentially 50+ hour game, and you quickly just forget about using it often.