Glad to see Fallout 4 doing so well with reviews.
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/fallout-4-review-roundup/1100-6432112/
Glad to see Fallout 4 doing so well with reviews.
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/fallout-4-review-roundup/1100-6432112/
It is - a solid 9 aggregate.
If you had pre-ordered and thought it would be excellent, that's vindication.
If you thought it svcked, the score won't change your mind and you and you will still prefer TW3/MGS etc.
So it's a win all round
Ars Technica's review was harsher than others I've seen, I felt like the reviewer was a fish out of water and was playing a game that just wasn't his thing.
This one caught my eye in particular (sorry, I just copy and pasted because laziness):
I know opinions will be opinions, but this sounds like "Bethesda writing" all over again. Which really wouldn't be surprising anyway.
Many reviews indicate what I thought, Power Armor is somewhat of a chore in a potentially 50+ hour game, and you quickly just forget about using it often.