RPS picks up on Crysis2 being a console port

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:38 am

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2011/03/29/crysis-2-technical-anolysis/
User avatar
Anna Watts
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 8:31 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:02 am

Crysis, built in the CryEngine 2, was capable of a 32.2m pixel spread across a 12 joule range, displayed in a dynamically generated four-part volumetric resource buffer. This meant a broad spectrum resonance in the upper 40s, with significant occlusion.

However, when we perform our benchmark tests on the CryEngine 3, it registers only 32.1m pixels in the 12J, reducing the BSR to a measly 43, with almost negligible ambience.

I hope I'm not the only person who had absolutely no idea what this meant.
User avatar
Robert Bindley
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 5:31 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:27 pm

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2011/03/29/crysis-2-technical-anolysis/


Bahahahah,eat this Crytek.


Your game is a complete broken console trash atm just say it......
User avatar
Ashley Tamen
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 6:17 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 7:49 am

Crysis, built in the CryEngine 2, was capable of a 32.2m pixel spread across a 12 joule range, displayed in a dynamically generated four-part volumetric resource buffer. This meant a broad spectrum resonance in the upper 40s, with significant occlusion.

However, when we perform our benchmark tests on the CryEngine 3, it registers only 32.1m pixels in the 12J, reducing the BSR to a measly 43, with almost negligible ambience.

I hope I'm not the only person who had absolutely no idea what this meant.


sounds like something from a science fiction novel.
User avatar
evelina c
 
Posts: 3377
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:28 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:00 pm

I hope ppl picked up the sarcasm in the article.........
User avatar
katie TWAVA
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 3:32 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:54 am

"With Crysis having supported DX12, and Crysis 2 not even shipping with DX11 support, it’s nothing short of a disgrace."

lolwut?
User avatar
Jhenna lee Lizama
 
Posts: 3344
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 5:39 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:06 am

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2011/03/29/crysis-2-technical-anolysis/


Bahahahah,eat this Crytek.


Your game is a complete broken console trash atm just say it......
^^ Sounds like some one didn't read the article and/or their sarcasm detection module is broken or turned off.
User avatar
Benjamin Holz
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:34 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:08 pm

lmao

dx12

I didnt even need to create my thread to show the idiots in here who have believed this.
User avatar
Heather Dawson
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:14 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:35 am

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2011/03/29/crysis-2-technical-anolysis/


Bahahahah,eat this Crytek.


Your game is a complete broken console trash atm just say it......

agreed.

Would be nice if crytek made a statement saying they know their game svcks and they did it for money.

PS: We didn't need to read that article to make this assumption. The game does that perfectly on its own.
User avatar
Adrian Powers
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:44 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:01 pm

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2011/03/29/crysis-2-technical-anolysis/


Bahahahah,eat this Crytek.


Your game is a complete broken console trash atm just say it......

agreed.

Would be nice if crytek made a statement saying they know their game svcks and they did it for money.

PS: We didn't need to read that article to make this assumption. The game does that perfectly on its own.


LOL. Obviously you didn't read the article, or were completely unable to understand it. The article is a scathing satire of the sad fanboy's arguing over minutiae with no more than subjective arguments.
User avatar
Bonnie Clyde
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:02 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:38 pm

lol now that's funny.

I have seen millions of troll posts on different
games, hell even made a few.

but that's the first troll review i have even seen,
and its obvious that the review was/is intended
to be a "get over it" type review
User avatar
john page
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:52 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:21 pm

Lol The article says Crysis 1 shipped with DX 12. OP was in such a hurry to trash the game. he clearly didn't read past the headline. What an ass.
User avatar
kasia
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:46 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 9:04 am

ahh!!! Rock, paper,shotgun. They are a bunch of sellouts!!!!!!!!!!

They had this big Crysis 2 splash page advertising the game for several days.

Then the moment they remove it this article appears.

They claim to be a pc gaming site but the problems with this game are serious and instead of them addressing those issues like any respectable media outlet would, they decide to make fun of the poor texture quality and the lack of dx11.

what a bunch of douche bags
User avatar
Vicki Blondie
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 5:33 am

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:01 pm

It's hilarious that people are actually believing this article, hahahaha
User avatar
Catharine Krupinski
 
Posts: 3377
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:39 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:24 am

It's hilarious that people are actually believing this article, hahahaha
Hey, there's also people whining about auto-aim being stripped from the PC version. I guess ignorance isn't always bliss.
User avatar
Anthony Santillan
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 6:42 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:28 am

Lol The article says Crysis 1 shipped with DX 12. OP was in such a hurry to trash the game. he clearly didn't read past the headline. What an ass.

ur a bigger ass..........if you bother to read through the thread I mentioned the article is satirical
User avatar
Project
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 7:58 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:07 am

LOL Tiago Sousa, Principal R&D Graphics Programmer at Crytek
tweets the above article as

"Best - tech - review - ever"
User avatar
Paula Rose
 
Posts: 3305
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:12 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:54 am

I honestly can't believe how dumb some people are.

It was immediately clear that the article was satirical.

They compared an open scene, the Crysis example was a huge mountain area and the Crysis 2 example was a collapsed tunnel. Are people really this dumb or just blinded by their own ignorance? Anyone looking at it sensibly could have picked up on what they were doing.
User avatar
Matt Gammond
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 2:38 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:04 am

LOL. Obviously you didn't read the article, or were completely unable to understand it. The article is a scathing satire of the sad fanboy's arguing over minutiae with no more than subjective arguments.

If you understood this:
Crysis, built in the CryEngine 2, was capable of a 32.2m pixel spread across a 12 joule range, displayed in a dynamically generated four-part volumetric resource buffer. This meant a broad spectrum resonance in the upper 40s, with significant occlusion.

However, when we perform our benchmark tests on the CryEngine 3, it registers only 32.1m pixels in the 12J, reducing the BSR to a measly 43, with almost negligible ambience.

then all I can say is:

Image
User avatar
trisha punch
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 5:38 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:49 am

Jesus, some of you lot are hard work. DarkLite, here's a hint - you weren't supposed to understand it. It's gibberish. That's the point!
User avatar
Barbequtie
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:34 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:44 am

"With Crysis having supported DX12, and Crysis 2 not even shipping with DX11 support, it’s nothing short of a disgrace."

Doesn't require a rocket scientist to figure out that it's a troll article.
User avatar
Claudia Cook
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 10:22 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:02 pm

"With Crysis having supported DX12, and Crysis 2 not even shipping with DX11 support, it’s nothing short of a disgrace."

lolwut?


DX12? huh? LOL.
User avatar
Kara Payne
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:47 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:17 am

He didn't have to say DX12.

...

Its DX10. Must have been a typo.

I agree
User avatar
Mr. Allen
 
Posts: 3327
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 8:36 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:23 am

Lol The article says Crysis 1 shipped with DX 12. OP was in such a hurry to trash the game. he clearly didn't read past the headline. What an ass.

ur a bigger ass..........if you bother to read through the thread I mentioned the article is satirical


No, you tried to save face after you got called out ****. You may be the dumbest person on these forums, and that's saying a lot.
User avatar
Jessica Colville
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:53 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:54 am

Lol The article says Crysis 1 shipped with DX 12. OP was in such a hurry to trash the game. he clearly didn't read past the headline. What an ass.

ur a bigger ass..........if you bother to read through the thread I mentioned the article is satirical


No, you tried to save face after you got called out ****. You may be the dumbest person on these forums, and that's saying a lot.

And you are a fool who is living in denial, you are just trying to defend the game even when there are solid proofs that this game has been degraded because of consoles limited hardware. There is no one trashing this game, the developers trashed it themselves thanks to consoles. And for God sake read the whole article, don't just sit with some typo mistake of Dx 12, try to read other things OP mentioned in the article (if you manage to understand them), there are enough proofs that the game has been decreased in terms of quality and thats the reason devs didn't included advanced graphic options for PC version.

Even if devs are trying to improve the game by releasing some quick patches the fact remains same, The game has been reduced to meet console standards.
User avatar
Angela Woods
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:15 pm

Next

Return to Crysis