Rubbish "Processor Type" for running highmax ESO?

Post » Thu Mar 20, 2014 1:39 am

So after playing on beta on my current laptop at low/medium settings, I have come to a resolution that for best experience of ESO, I should invest in buying a new PC... one that will play ESO in its highest settings!

I have found a great PC on amazon for a very good price with these specs:

4.0GHz AMD FX 8350 Eight Core Piledriver Processor (Turbo Speed 4.2GHz)
16GB of DDR3 1600Mhz RAM
2000GB (2TB) Hard Drive Storage Space
AMD Radeon R9 270 2GB Dedicated Advanced Graphics Card
Gigabyte 78LMT-USB3 Motherboard & Driver
Which pretty much surpasses the "Recommended Requirements" as in GameDebate for ESO.
***EDIT***
Thanks very much to everyone who has kindly helped in clarifying some questions and recommended great tips.
I think after thinking about this hard, my verdict is to go for these specs as they come all under £600 without an OS.!
User avatar
Alyesha Neufeld
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 10:45 am

Post » Thu Mar 20, 2014 6:42 am

if your not building ur own its a waste of money take ur time and research and build your own system rather than pay thru the nose for someone elses built system people who sell built computers on amazon buy the cheapest parts they can and then sell high to maximize profits if u want a good system you can go with several options also btw your better off with two 1 TB hard drives than with a 2 TB hard drive since the 1 TB hard drives are stabler

User avatar
Jade Barnes-Mackey
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:29 am

Post » Wed Mar 19, 2014 8:36 pm

If u want a good processor, go for Intel i5 or i7, I've heard too many bad things about Athlon. Also 16Gb ram is overkill, 8gb is more than enough to have really, really short loading screens. I have 6gb ram atm and loading screens go quickly. Ram wont affect ur fps tho.

User avatar
TIhIsmc L Griot
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 6:59 pm

Post » Wed Mar 19, 2014 10:05 pm

lol AMD is just as good as intel for gaming purposes and a heckuva lot cheaper I will say though the processor u listed isnt very good your better off going with a AMD PHenom black quad core or 6 core no real need for a 8 core at this point unless u work in the graphics design or programming fields

User avatar
Emmanuel Morales
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 2:03 pm

Post » Thu Mar 20, 2014 7:08 am

That is an excellent cpu and will run ESO easily. The FX 8350 is the AMD's near equivalent to Intel's i7. http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

As the #2 poster said, if you can build your own machine from ordering the parts separately, it will be less expensive. But if you want less fuss and muss, that system should give you great performance.

Adding in that AMD 290 card will really push up the overall system price. Most places are charging much higher prices than the msrp on that line..

User avatar
meg knight
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 4:20 am

Post » Wed Mar 19, 2014 8:54 pm

Where are you buying from? (UK, US or elsewhere?)

What is your budget?

If you can reply with these I'll see what I can knock up for you :)

User avatar
Jerry Jr. Ortiz
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:39 pm

Post » Thu Mar 20, 2014 1:35 am

Hello I'm from UK and my budget is under £700 if possible, including OS. Or £650 and under without OS.

User avatar
Stephanie Nieves
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:52 pm

Post » Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:04 pm

It looks like I had stupidly omitted the FX 8350 part when I was doing the performance calculator!

I went on the manufacturer's website itself- VIBOX, and tried building my own parts, and it still works out cheaper for better HD space and bigger RAM space with amazon deal.

If Kaendor's right in that ESO runs perfectly quick and fast with 8GB RAM, perhaps I can browse for PCs that offer lesser specs for lesser price...

User avatar
Riky Carrasco
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 12:17 am

Post » Thu Mar 20, 2014 6:51 am

Is that true? 1 TB will be stabler? Ok! I will take up your advice and look for this instead. Thank you :)

User avatar
Johnny
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:32 am

Post » Thu Mar 20, 2014 3:12 am

Ok 8GB RAM sounds good enough then yes? Is it the graphics card then that will affect the FPS mainly? Is the graphics card above good enough for high FPS consistently?

User avatar
Eire Charlotta
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 6:00 pm

Post » Wed Mar 19, 2014 5:25 pm

Graphics card and ur processor is what affects the Fps mainly as far as I know. Your video card sounds very good, you should have no problems with it. I had problems before with my video card overheating, you might not encounter this issue, but If I can give you a tip, buy an extra fan and attach it to ur cpu since its better to be prepared. Im running a 2gb GeForce GTX 650, I run the game on ultra with no problems. I get some fps lag sometimes but thats because of my processor that I got to upgrade.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121823you can see some info about that video card.

User avatar
P PoLlo
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:05 am

Post » Thu Mar 20, 2014 7:40 am

Finished building my new PC today specifically to play ESO. Had a budget of $800, ended up spending $1k. Sigh...well at least it'll play anything on max settings.

User avatar
Loane
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:35 am

Post » Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:58 pm

Wow that's a great budget, it's what I'm looking for really. How did you build you own? Do you mean building your own manually with your own hands or getting a specialist to do it for you?

May I ask what your newly built specs are if it can play all on max settings? It sounds fantastic for just 1k!!

User avatar
Manuela Ribeiro Pereira
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:24 pm

Post » Wed Mar 19, 2014 5:41 pm

How does this look to you?

CASE:

Cooler Master K-350 Black Mid Tower £33.59

PSU:

550W Antec VP550F Black PSU £50.39

MOBO:

MSI Z87-G41 PC Mate, Intel Z87 £68.24

CPU:

Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO £25.45

Intel Core i5 4670K, S 1150, Haswell, Quad Core, 3.4GHz £167.94

GPU:

2GB XFX Radeon R9 270 Boost (BF4 free) £132.32

RAM:

8GB Corsair DDR3 XMS3 PC3-12800 (1600) £60.96

System SSD:

128GB Corsair Force Series GS 2.5" SSD £57.59

Storage HDD:

1TB Seagate ST1000DM003 Barracuda £41.98

Total = £649.44

Still need an OS and an optical drive (well maybe I've not used my optical drive for 4 years)

You'll see the biggest gains from having a SSD. The CPU will be future proof for a few years at least and the GPU will eat ESO for breakfast. With the MOBO you'll have the flexibility to upgrade the GPU add more RAM and additional HDDs should you require. You may have to consider a different cooler for the CPU should you be interested in overclocking but out of the box it will be fine.

User avatar
Far'ed K.G.h.m
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:03 pm

Post » Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:53 pm

Yes, you're missing something.

That Processor is about 4x as fast as mine, and I run on Ultra.

That said, I wouldn't buy AMD, but that's just me.

User avatar
Tamara Primo
 
Posts: 3483
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 7:15 am

Post » Wed Mar 19, 2014 10:34 pm

To be fair ESO isnt the most demanding of games. I can play on Ultra without any problems in PvE (PvP is a different story) and that's on an Intel E8500 CPU, GTX 460 GPU and only 4GB of RAM, no SSD and old P5Q Pro MOBO and a small 450w Corsair PSU. It does the job, I can play fine in PvP on High but I will be looking to upgrade my system this summer so I can play PvP on Ultra.

What are the specs of your current system? (Start >> Run >> DxDiag)

User avatar
kelly thomson
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:18 pm

Post » Thu Mar 20, 2014 8:06 am

Depends what you're after, bang per buck AMD is the winner my old FX55 was a beast back in the day and I wouldn't think twice about an FX 9590! But Intel currently do hold the crown for the quickest processors especially their Xeon range but were not looking at making a server hive here.

If youve got the budget go for Intel, if not get a good solid AMD that has a high headway for OCing and you won't be disappointed.

User avatar
BlackaneseB
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:21 am

Post » Thu Mar 20, 2014 6:26 am

Get an i5, anything that can be OCed around 4ghz will get the job done, an old cheap "3750k" would be perfect. Anything followed by a "k" is good.

Keep in mind this is only required for PvP (huge battles, lot of players on screen) because when it comes to PvE my mule comp can run this game fine in high settings.

AMD are not bad processors, its just that some games dont like them.

User avatar
^_^
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 12:01 am

Post » Thu Mar 20, 2014 1:52 am

That all looks great, exactly the specs I'd want but the PC I found on amazon has HD space and RAM twice as big as your specs and cost less. £599.99

So verdict I think you won't get any cheaper than yours or better specs than mine for £600 right? :D

User avatar
Lucie H
 
Posts: 3276
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:46 pm

Post » Thu Mar 20, 2014 7:33 am

lolz.. that's the textbook definition of "bad"

I was a huge AMD fan back in the K6 days. I even got to see a 600Mhz Athlon running months before they were released. But AMD systems always required a little too much tweaking for my taste. Even in the days when AMD outperformed Intel, the extra work to get it going wasn't worth the effort.

ymmv

User avatar
Krystal Wilson
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:40 am

Post » Thu Mar 20, 2014 5:45 am

OS: Windows 7
Processor: Intel® Core™ i3-2310M CPU @ 2.10GHz
Memory 4096MB RAM
Graphics: Intel® HD Graphics Family 1696MB
My laptop ain't so bad! But graphics don't look too great on majority low settings/medium
User avatar
Johanna Van Drunick
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:40 am

Post » Wed Mar 19, 2014 10:40 pm

Well if you look at the benchmarks some of the AMDs are really good.

From a gamer perspective yeah they are just not reliable.

User avatar
Peetay
 
Posts: 3303
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:33 am

Post » Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:32 am

Hmmm what do you need the extra space for? Also why do you need 16gb of RAM (more is not always better) do you do a lot of HD rendering, CAD work or run a flight simulator from your PC?

Do you have the exact specs and manufacturer listed for each of the parts of the PC you're buying on Amazon? I'll see what it would cost to buy the parts and build it yourself.

EDIT:
Or better yet link me to the item :smile: will be quicker.

User avatar
Camden Unglesbee
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:30 am

Post » Thu Mar 20, 2014 12:14 am

This is what I have an during the beta I have been able to play at Max settings with most places being 80FPS and 120FPS in less intensive places.. Dropping to 30 during huge PvP encounters.

CASE: Cooler Master HAF 912 Mid Tower

PSU: EVGA 600B 80 Plus Bronze

OS: Windows 7 64bit

PROCESSOR: AMD FX-8350 Black Edition Vishera 4.0 GHZ OC to 4.5GHZ

MEMORY: 16GB Gskill DDR3

DISK SPACE:

  • 500GB HDD
  • 250GB SDD

GPU: EVGA GTX 760 4GB VRAM

MOTHERBOARD: ASUS M5A97 R2.0 ATX

User avatar
Laura Ellaby
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 9:59 am

Post » Thu Mar 20, 2014 2:45 am

I've always bought a variety of CPUs just because I like to keep from getting stuck with the misconceptions and urban legends. Of the problems I had, it technically wasn't the CPU that had trouble, but mostly the motherboards aka chipsets. Some chipsets just seem to have more *little* things going on with it than intel. My expereince was if you wanted an absolute trouble free system, You bought a basic Intel motherboard. Sometimes it's all the bells and whistles they throw in for overclocking that leads to problems elsewhere, even when you don't overclock at all.

I had more *little* problems with the Nforce series motherboards than anything else.

With all that said, while I mostly own Intel now I think most people would find any of the latest AMD chipsets more than enough for their needs. Worst case you might have to stay on top of keeping the various chipset drivers up to date than a generic Intel system, but I doubt it would be that much extra work. AMD is moving away from highend CPUs and focusing more on the middle of the road CPU\GPU market. So sadly for us gamers, Intel will soon be the only answer for the higher end market.

Guess we need to define what is "a lot" cheaper. The FX8350 is $199. The i5-4670 is $220 if you want the overlock-able version than $240. If a person isn't interested in overclocking the cost difference is $20, I myself consider that a wash. If you're into overclocking then the 8350 may prove to be a better value.

User avatar
Michael Russ
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:33 am

Next

Return to Othor Games