» Tue May 17, 2011 9:22 am
Gaius, from what I've experienced truebloom6 (i think it was that number) was pretty performance intensive & a bit over the top with the bloom values. Though you can play with the values, I think. For rev 186 I recently used phals HDRbloom.
--------------
Anyway, some screens:
http://i.imgur.com/JidnK.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/hw1zl.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/cwJwo.jpg