seriously!
Stop complaining, Obsidian did the right thing.
Uh, no. I am going to keep complaining because Obsidian did the WRONG thing.
I read that sawyer quote thing, and it made no sense. Literally every rpg I own lets me keep playing. The ones I had in the past that did not, I don't have any more, because I traded them, or even just through them out. Why? because this is post 2000 and most rpgs don't simply end. Yeah, I liked the MQ. it was good, but to say that they would have to have re scripted the antire game is stupid.
here is an easy solution, did you do the legion mq? let the player keep playing and just replace ncr in the strip with Legion. I am not asking for an endless quest line, maybe I just want to role play a little after the ending. Yeah I can live with it the way it was, its just not as good as it would have been.
And just saying that I am stupid for wanting to play a game even after I beat it's main quest is not a good argument for Obsidians lame choices. before I go on to state a list of game titles that LET the player keep playing I am going to also adress the fact that while it was said that every fallout title preceding FO3 had a definite end. Guess what!? the fall out genre belongs to Bethesda now, and their most prominent and consecutive game of the year winning games (the elderscrolls) lets you keep playing without having all of the problems that is used as an excuse in that lame sawyer quote.
Games that let you continue to play after beating the main quest:
Fable
Morrowind, Oblivion
Dragon age origins
FO3 (with broken steel, which was added BECAUSE mass people asked for it!!!!)
Grand theft auto (not an rpg, but you still get to play after wards even after doing a long list of unbelievable acts that required no "re scripting". so what if you have all the possible gang territories in san andres, its still fun to keep killing your rival gangs.
Red Dead Redemption.
And much more lamer games with not even a tenth of New vegas's budget.