Severely Disappointed!!!!

Post » Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:37 pm

I just bought the game and finished it on the pc. After the graphics on the old desktop, i thought the ps3 version could of not had been worse. And then EA fu***d it up somehow. http://planetxgamer.com/news/crysis-2-ps3-suffers-from-poorer-framerate-resolution-and-graphics-than-360/1962/ THIS IS TRUE. The graphics are awefull. Like someone entered the settings and set all of it to low. Everything's plain and jaggedy. NO AA. It just looks terrible. I never complain or post stuff like this, but the game on the PS3 is just shameful. (After u bash me with ps3 can't do pc graphics couse no video card bla bla, I know, but the dif is like comparing Half Life 2 with Killzone 3, between the ps3 version and the pc. + the xbox version looks better, way better)
User avatar
Sun of Sammy
 
Posts: 3442
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:38 pm

Post » Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:55 pm

ok...good for you man ;D
User avatar
Miss K
 
Posts: 3458
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:33 pm

Post » Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:01 pm

Cool story, but who cares if the 360 version looks better, unless you own both, you wouldn't know if no one compared and you couldn't care less... I know for a fact that I don't care, since I don't have a xbox.

If you care that much buy an xbox and play it on that console...?
User avatar
Claire Vaux
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 6:56 am

Post » Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:39 pm

Game looks beautiful over here and haven't noticed any framerate issues. Very not disappointing.
User avatar
Michelle Serenity Boss
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 10:49 am

Post » Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:31 am

Game looks beautiful over here and haven't noticed any framerate issues. Very not disappointing.

I agree. And i dont find it disappointing at all.
User avatar
Yung Prince
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:45 pm

Post » Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:03 am

I think you are blind dude, seriously, either you have a crap TV OR you have set your PS3 up really wrong or like I said you have eyesight issues. I was about to make a thread saying the complete opposite! Looking at reviews they agree with me, IGN for example has screenshots and video comparing the 3 and they state "of course the PC version looks sharper but the 2 console versions look fantastic" "easily the best graphics in any console game released to date".

I totally agree with them, I sat in the cemetary before behind the church just staring at amazement for 5 mins at how fantastic everything looked. The trees swaying, the grass moving, the way the sunlight refracted through the tree's and the shadows play about. Then when I shot the tombstones big chunks of stone flew off... the textures are sharp, much like Killzone 3, and I was totally amazed that the developers managed to get it to run smoothly on the PS3 at all, I spun around shooting with no slowdowns! Btw I am playing through HDMI on a 52 inch Sony Bravia Full-HD Screen.

Try a new HDMI cable or seek help.
User avatar
Dj Matty P
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 12:31 am

Post » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:37 am

Yea man ur crazy. C2 looks unbelievable and plays great. Sure there r bugs but name a recent release that didnt need a patch or two. Chill out dude if ur disappointed about this game idk what to tell u. Its the most balanced online fps out there and i play mag, blops, moh and crysis 2 and am at the very least, decent at all of them. The framerate does dip now and then during hectic sequences or orbital strikes but i get the same thing during napalms and sometimes rolling thunders on black ops. Stop crying and posting all this hateful nonsense. Udk anything about what it takes or how to begin developing a video game so just stop. They make games. Its what they do. Do they come to ur house and complain about ur crappy hate blogs/forum posts? No. Cuz thats ur thing. Thats what u do and they leave u to it lol seriously im sick of searching for crysis info and only reading u crybabies' rants. Get good kids! PSN: SloanKetterin
User avatar
Nienna garcia
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 3:23 am

Post » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:59 pm

I argee with KGBHitman2011, i've seen that video on ign there's not a big differance. i'm playing on the same tv as KGBHitman2011 and it looks great, yes there are some bug that need patched but it's still a great game.
User avatar
Hayley Bristow
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 12:24 am

Post » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:10 am

I thought it was stunning. didn't really see any issues, hiccups or foibles to speak of.
User avatar
Robert Jr
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:49 pm

Post » Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:16 am

You obviously havent't played Homefront. Now theres a dissapointing game with awful graphics.
User avatar
Amber Ably
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:39 pm

Post » Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:38 pm

You obviously havent't played Homefront. Now theres a dissapointing game with awful graphics.



When you can actually get into a game of Homefront its 20x better than crysis 2. Keyword in that sentence is WHEN.
User avatar
daniel royle
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 8:44 am

Post » Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:43 pm

Homefront looks like it was made for the PS2 , but I'm not too bothered about the graphics on games its the way the game plays and crysis 2 is In my opinion , ahead of all the CODs, Socoms and Killzones in gaming satisfaction. The only games that's better multi player wise is battlefield. I hated homefront, but thats just my opinion, differernt people like differernt games, If you like Homefront i'm pleased for you, I was happy to sell mine after a week and only lose £10. (thats about $16)
User avatar
meghan lock
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:26 pm


Return to Crysis