To answer the posted question: NO.
The next game should be entitled Fallout 4 (and we can forget about NV)
I loved Fallout 3.
Bethesda should make the next Fallout game.
Fallout 3 was bigger, and had way more to do.
Lots more exploring and dungeon crawling.
FONV screwed over VATS & nerfed E-weapons, and the whole DT system is bunk (why can I empty the clip of my 9mm into someones face -with no helmet- and they are still standing there?)
BTW New Vegas (the city) was VERY disappointing. DC was much better.
Sorry, I just can't agree. The only thing Fallout 3 did better than any other Fallout game, was the pointless exploring part. That has never been a part of a Fallout game, before, and to speak straight, adding it was a good thing but removing/changing everything else at its expense was the worst idea I've seen in the history of gaming (and now seeing it happening to other franchises like X-Com, Jagged Alliance and so forth, just makes me sick).
I don't think FNV screwed VATS in any way (as if screwing would even be possible), and DT was indeed a bit flawed but nowhere near as [censored] as the global DR Fallout 3 had. (I'm part of the group that accepts that emptying a clip to someones face, isn't gamebraking, but gameplayenhancing feature as it promotes the character and his skills. It would've been better if this issue was handled through accuracy instead of damage, much better! But that didn't happen, unfortunately.)