should they completely overhaul the lore

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 1:24 am

It seems like in every elders scrolls the lore becomes less accurate and more crontradictory to the former it no longer rmakes any sense I want To read Others opinions on the matter so what do you think
User avatar
Lance Vannortwick
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 5:30 pm

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 10:59 am

No.

...

...No.
User avatar
Victoria Bartel
 
Posts: 3325
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:20 am

Post » Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:40 pm

No
User avatar
Joanne Crump
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 9:44 am

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 6:26 am

I don't see how you could have an overhaul (let alone a "complete" one) without making it a fresh setting. Yes there are discrepancies and some of them are controversial but the core setting seems largely in tact.

Also, when we consider that much of the lore we have comes from in-game sources it's understandable that things won't always add up. You look at the history of an region or people and you'll find discrepancies and conflicts that far exceed anything in the Elder Scrolls lore and this is all "real" information.
User avatar
Krystina Proietti
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:02 pm

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 11:59 am

Not really.. half the fun is asking questions, trying to figure out whats going on yourself.
The other half is debating it with others, to see views you never considered, just like life.
User avatar
X(S.a.R.a.H)X
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:38 pm

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 5:23 am

No

User avatar
jodie
 
Posts: 3494
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 8:42 pm

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 12:35 am

Try again.
User avatar
Agnieszka Bak
 
Posts: 3540
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:15 pm

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 3:28 am

No.
User avatar
Joanne Crump
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 9:44 am

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 11:22 am

Not really seeing how you think the lore is so messed up that a complete overhaul is required. There's not even that many things that don't make sense. A few discrepancies here and there but, but so much that it's not even feasible? Not really.
No overhaul needed.
User avatar
Kay O'Hara
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:04 pm

Post » Sun Dec 26, 2010 8:41 pm

No.

...just no.

It's in-game books, so contradicting would make sense.
User avatar
Tamara Dost
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 12:20 pm

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 6:53 am

Nope.
User avatar
X(S.a.R.a.H)X
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:38 pm

Post » Sun Dec 26, 2010 9:38 pm

Please explain your opinion – and the reasoning behind it – in more depth.
User avatar
Roberta Obrien
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:43 pm

Post » Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:42 pm

Sometimes it gets confusing, but I'd rather have it NOT hauled over, just continued to be expanded.
User avatar
IM NOT EASY
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:48 pm

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 2:05 am

I have to agree with the others here, Bethesda should not completely change the lore. Now, there are things about the lore that I think could be better but if you're just going to completely rewrite everything, than what's the point of even claiming it's the same setting? You might as well just set it in a completely new universe. And it's not like Bethesda can't do that, Bethesda is legally allowed to make games other than the Elder Scrolls. If they really wanted to do a different setting, they could always just start a new series set in a different universe.

If Bethesda wants to adress the inconsistencies present in the lore, the solution would be to explain why the current lore differs from the past, or change it back to the way it was before. Changing everything isn't the solution.
User avatar
carly mcdonough
 
Posts: 3402
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 3:23 am

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 2:15 am

No.

I like the confusion. I mean, how many disappearance of the Dwemer theories have thier been?

If anything, we need books to lie. They shouldn't be a 100% hard fact of the world. A lot of books where written by big, superioritist scholars simply to big up themselves or thier cause.
User avatar
christelle047
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:50 pm

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 5:55 am

OP... No.

No.

I like the confusion. I mean, how many disappearance of the Dwemer theories have thier been?

If anything, we need books to lie. They shouldn't be a 100% hard fact of the world. A lot of books where written by big, superioritist scholars simply to big up themselves or thier cause.

Exactly.

Ohh, and OP... No.
User avatar
IsAiah AkA figgy
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 7:43 am

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 10:27 am

Please explain your opinion – and the reasoning behind it – in more depth.



When I was skimming through the imperial city Library I saw contridictions alot of them But i'm not exactly saying to redo It from scratch that's a pain in the [censored] for the writers what I meant to say the more lore you make the harder to remember what have you have acknowladge before I know it gives it a more realistic perspective how the thoughts of mortals evolve over time and their truth they know about their own world change like for instance humans used to believe in the planets revolving around the earth i'm just saying they could completely disregard some of there lore in future games and it would make since since at different time periods understanding of our natural would gets more depth and complexity but certain aspects such as the dates or the phases of the two moons should stay the same I would care less about contradictinos if they had some proof of disproving the previous beliefs that was establish in previous games.

and if the rumors about it being set 250 yrs in the future or something like that are correct I dont want them to waste time keeping some aspects of the lore "alive"
User avatar
remi lasisi
 
Posts: 3307
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:26 pm

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 5:00 am

No.

But expect controversial retcons in the future anyway.
User avatar
brian adkins
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:51 am

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 3:29 am

People have already given my opinions. Namely, "no," and further "any dicrepancy can be chalked up to lore being entirely from in-universe sources and are therefore both understandable and make the setting deeper and more interesting."
User avatar
Multi Multi
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 4:07 pm

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 11:44 am

NO NO NO.
User avatar
Nuno Castro
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:40 am

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 10:26 am

The lore is often dumb and makes no sense in TES, but they shouldn't go out of their way to change it. They should just make new games where they do a better job. Eventually, the old lore will be updated, tweaked, and over written enough that they world makes more sense.
User avatar
Steve Fallon
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:29 am

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 5:20 am

The lore is often dumb and makes no sense in TES, but they shouldn't go out of their way to change it. They should just make new games where they do a better job. Eventually, the old lore will be updated, tweaked, and over written enough that they world makes more sense.

Don't insault the Lore... on the Lore forums. It doesn't bode well with its residents.

And NO, they don't need to change it,they just need to spend more time matching what Lore exists to what appears in the game. IE, don't turn Summerset Islands into a jungle (in an opposite of what they did to Cyrodiil>)
User avatar
WTW
 
Posts: 3313
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:48 pm

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 10:29 am

The lore is often dumb and makes no sense in TES, but they shouldn't go out of their way to change it.

It could be dumb, because you don't understand it.

http://www.gamesas.com/index.php?/topic/15282-elder-scrolls-lore-faq/

http://www.gamesas.com/index.php?/topic/1112211-how-to-become-a-lore-buff/
User avatar
Alkira rose Nankivell
 
Posts: 3417
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:56 pm

Post » Mon Dec 27, 2010 2:54 pm

First of all, what is lore? Some people here on the forums seems to claim that everything written in some book or note is lore. Some say that lore is what the newest game present to us.
An example of this is the Cyrodiil not being a jungle. Have we ever been 100% sure it was supposed to be a jungle? Or is it just a small piece of information written a long time ago without much thought to it. The games where cyrodiil has been accessable hasn't been a jungle, but a small line written somewhere seems to mean more than what we see in the games.

So what is correct "lore"?
User avatar
Maria Leon
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:39 am

Post » Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:26 pm

Correct lore is what ever the developers want it to be.

And yes, we were absolutely sure that Cyrodiil was jungle. Or at least as sure as we can be with anything in TES.
User avatar
Bethany Short
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:47 am

Next

Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion