I don't mind either way, but certainly don't get people being dead set against it. The animations you dislike are being used for the whole game, it's not really an excuse.
I don't mind either way, but certainly don't get people being dead set against it. The animations you dislike are being used for the whole game, it's not really an excuse.
I don't really see the point in including that sort of thing. The cons seem to outweigh the pros.
PROS
1) The possibility of encouraging a greater emotional attachment to an NPC.
2) Everyone likes boobs.
3) It's the only action some players get.
CONS
1) First person six scenes don't look easy to portray, and we don't need the inclusion of crap that forces us into third. Video game romance tends to be pretty lame, anyway.
2) As to nudity, the days of games with only naked ladies is past ... that would be 'sixist'. If the cost of having naked ladies is going to be naked dudes, then everyone should keep their clothes on. Let modders handle the nudity, so players can install only what they want to see.
3) It would be questionable wisdom to include six animations in a highly moddable game, particularly with the strange predilection of many players to use mods to create and play underage characters.
4) Really, BGS has better things to devote development resources to.
5) Ghouls.
6) Voiced protagonist grunting.
What?! Are you simple?
It's not going to happen anyway, but that's besides the point, for other reasons but why would you be opposed to this in games? If it's just a concern of disc space being taken up with other animations you would rather see, then fine, but it sounds like you're coming at it from a personally offended angle. That's not only bizarre (why would you find six offensive?) but it's also really stupid because I'm pretty sure there are people out there offended by burning innocent people alive, cannibalizing them, mutilating their corpses, selling children into (presumably) sixual slavery, bludgeoning them to death with hammers and so on..
The thing is all these are optional in the game, just as six scenes would, presumably, be. You either don't initiate six with NPCs or you skip the scene, right? That way you can still get your fade-to-black super mutant ball gag scenario and others of a less sensitive disposition can witness a fairly traumatizing scene unfold before their eyes.
Everybody wins, surely?
Why? Those mods you fear already exist.
Bethesda if you're reading this I will ONLY buy Fallout 4 if the features from Shlongs of Skyrim are built into the game.
Me too. I feel the same way. It's not that big of a deal.
Oh briast feeding would start a riot here in the forums. Violence? No problem. Graphic six? Maybe a couple of morality fanatics will make a fuss. But briast feeding? Forum mods are gonna be reeaaal busy!
I don't know about you but I would expect the husband and wife to do this sort of thing.
I have yet to see a six scene in a video game that is not either poorly animated, awkward as all hell, or borderline creepy. If Bethesda can overcome these things then by all means put six scenes in the game.
Oddly enough in games like Mass Effect and Dragon Age, I have found the romance scenes that aren't the actual six scenes make me feel more of a connection to the NPC's. I don't feel like the actual act of six really adds much to the game.
On a serious note I'm not expecting too much romance in this game. Either your wife/husband is dead and that'll probably hurt the main character quite a bit, or (s)he's still alive with presumably more pressing matters to deal with.
And there hasn't really been romance in any of the other Fallout games I've played that i recall either...
NPC's do need more emotions in video games developed by Bethesda Games Studios, the NPC's need more personality to them.
http://img.pandawhale.com/106986-Scooby-Doo-thats-my-fetish-gif-1DwI.gif
It wouldn't bother me if they did. I can't sit here and saying killing is fine but seeing boobs or a butt is a step too far.
Why would you even THINK there was shown six in this game? Bethesda has never done such things in their games. At most, they fade to black for a few seconds.
Personally I find such scenes to be pretty obnoxious attempts to look "mature."
The Elder Scrolls II: Daggerfall you can see the females briasts who have no clothes on and there was a time where Bethesda Softworks wanted six, but never added it in.
I would be fine with a topless bar in the seedier parts of Boston.
-Daggerfall example = Not six
-The closest thing we got to six was Crassus Curio having us strip down to our under garments in Morrowind, and a one page description of Queen Baranziah riding a Khajit's [censored] in a seedy, thieves guild bar.
i still don't understand the dbl standard between female briasts and male briasts we all start out as female before hormones.
i can understand women not wanting them flop around all the time because of the weight and guess being straight up uncomfortable .
when i was a baby my mom was kicked out a movie all because i was hungry.
one those mystery in life i guess.
and study's show almost every part human body can found to be erotic.
still i don't think needs too be in the game and shown six in BGS games could be real bad looking but if it is i wouldn't complain about it
Did you not read the part where I said Bethesda Softworks wanted to put six in The Elder Scrolls II: Daggerfall?
While I am all for giving people the options I feel that in a mature game the devs should be able to portray mature content.
It's not like they are forced on the player, most of the games it's a completely optional path you can take or not, so the player is the one that makes that choice.
I don't want to play a game that feels "held back/censored" because of someone elses viewpoint.
By all means allow players who don't want to see it, not to see it, but don't force everyone to have it cut out because someone else doesn't want it, that's just my opinion.
And it was cut. They even cut that six scene from the Real Barenziah that I mentioned earlier (In Oblivion and Skyrim). They've had 19 years to add six scenes, and they haven't.