I never got this whole thing about self censoring, it's the most absurd thing in the world of censoring. Especially in games where we get so much freaking violence, showing dismemberment, murder and all kinds of violence you can think of. But as soon as we jump over to the most natural thing in our existence, which is six, everyone goes all haywire the moment the tip of a [censored] is shown.

It's like people don't get that this is more natural than portraying violence. If we're going to make a fairly realistic game as realistic goes when you do a sci-fi game, why leave out the one part that makes most sense. People really need to stop overreacting. You were made because your parents had six and your children will/were made the same way.

I'm against all kinds of censorship, if I had it my way we'd do games as intended, without limitations. Also we'd not say [censored] you to free speech and censor words that have a totally legit meaning to your message. It's not about foul language, it's about expressing yourself. If games have six in them, don't engage in ingame sixual activities, simple as that. And for you who are concerned about youngsters playing games with six in them, should probably be more concerned about the extended amount of violence instead. Or that you're a bad parent because you let your kid play a game you didn't research beforehand. Not much can go wrong about six, but where violence goes, everything can go wrong real quick. It takes a good while longer to get someone pregnant, while murder only takes a second.

Anyhow, back to the topic a bit. Nudity will most likely be implemented by ways of mods like in previous Fallout games.

Heck why not one up it and show the title then fade to black and then show the credits!

*Congratz! You beat the game!*

I rather agree on the censorship thing.

About ingame and my personal oppinion. A well made romance / six scene can easily be in a game, for my sake, if part of a romantic storyline. Heck or a prison shower scene... If part of the story... Strippers and prosttutes on the other hand never really held any interest for me.

Bethesda has never shown six in any game so far..

Why do you think they start now?

They've always had it on the back burner though.

You know, thinking back to Fisto, maybe not showing six scenes is a good idea...

I honestly wish they did.

Look if you Want animated six in Fallout there will be that option on PC

Im not sure if there will be that option on console but whatever.

depends on microsoft greenlighting certain mods for the xbox version

The way they did it in NV works for me. That "moan" in the black screen is a way that it happened, not just a loading screen. I guess Witcher 3 does it in a decent way, and with FO4 going into what seems to be more of a cinematic interaction approach, it could fit. I dont see the reason to animate it though. I want it to be in game, because it is one of those actions that make a difference in a relationship between two (or more? ) characters. It is something that creates/changes the dynamic, even without dialog options changing.

Nudity yes, six? Not really. It looks clunky in the game, far from being realistic. Want six, surf the internet, lots of porm sites out there

Well Daggerfall and Battlespire both included full nudity, Daggerfall was even planned to have fmvs of six with prosttutes. So, I have no problem with six or nudity in Fallout. It fits with the whole post apocalyptic anarchy angle.

There's a comforting thought.........

Well I haven't really looked at it from a company perspective but more as a trend that modern games in general are following.
The Fallouts are the only Bethesda games I own (and one of them is by Obsidian so..).

Boobs and booty are bad. But beating a guy with a chainsaw bat until he explode into a hundred pieces is fine. Yeah I never understood the reasoning either.

ASSUME THE POSITION

This is yet another silly argument. What the OP should ask for is not for the dev to avid putting something into the game, but rather for whatever it is to be optional or at least skippable. The devs should not omit contents just because some players might not like it.

The OP was asking for them to keep out something that was never in Fallout before. I don't think there's anything wrong with that.

So you are saying that because Fallout didn't have it, FO4 shouldn't have it?

I'm saying that because Fallout 1, Fallout 2, Fallout Tactics, The Burned Game, Fallout 3, and Fallout: New Vegas didn't have it, it's a waste of effort that could be better spent on more relevant things to put it in Fallout 4.

Waste? I don't see why.

Just because some people don't like doesn't mean others won't. As long as players are not forced to go through it I don't see the problem.

And we haven't seen anything so far that would warrant such worry to begin with.

I don't understand why people want it thrown into the game so badly, especially when it's something Bethesda has no experience implementing. The fade-to-black was good enough for Obsidian.

As numerous others have said, Bethesda has refrained from adding sixualised content in their previous titles. I doubt they'd start now. Due to how easy they make their games to mod I'd guess that someone will probably create at least a nudity mod sometime down the line. Not sure if any six scenes would be possible or worth the effort though.

I didn't say I want it. All I said is that they shouldn't avoid it just because some might not like it. That is, if they are even considering it at all.

Once again, we haven't seen anything that suggest such possibility.

I don't see it as a matter of them avoiding it. Rather, I see it as a matter of putting the effort into what they know and what is more relevant to the series. A fade-to-black is easy to implement. Making a shown six scene takes a lot of work and can very easily come off as poorly done.