Within the context of AI handling ranged attacks by stealthed characters, which is not a fact. Really, it's not an issue of me not understanding the statement. I understand it perfectly fine. Within the context of where it was made, it was baseless speculation and it was stated as fact.
"Ranged combat shouldn't be able to be abused from stealth like in Oblivion due to the fact that NPCs are FAR more intelligent than any TES game ever and possibly any game to date, we shall see."
Yep stated as complete fact with no uncertainty.
No. It's pretty much exactly what they described it to be, it just doesn't function nearly as well as they'd portrayed it as functioning. It was always going to be "scripted AI" - it was an AI scheduling system with a few scripted reactions to certain things, and that's pretty clearly all they ever intended for it to be.
Well seeing as how BGS even said that they had to scrap their Radiant AI system and only use an aspect of it, I guess your right, they always intended it to be that way.
I love how most of this thread is Sleign arguing with everyone whether he said some thing was speculation or fact.
Well it's fun to repost all my information from my last two thread where the majority of the posts were "Thank you for the well ordered information" and the questions which I and the other members of this forum answered for those that can't get the GI article and then get the topic derailed by people saying I am claiming three items, that I wrote as speculation and made it abundantly clear with the wording that it was speculation, are stated as fact as I have showed they aren't. I love how I type all these in-depth explanations for everyone, taking my time to help others get the information that they otherwise wouldn't get or would have to sift through the countless forum posts that may or may not by true or accurate and then I get harassed by people claiming that I said something that I didn't. Being attacked for a few shreds of information that were speculation but were in their correct sections....now I know how the devs felt after Oblivion...
You might want to remove that, it's not true. That was just the journalists way of saying that it's an open-world game. He'd probably say the same thing about Oblivion, even though you can see some places that you can't get to.
I understand your concerns but at least I can't be attacked for that snippet of information if it is wrong, those are game informers words. I really don't want to remove it and it be true. Might as well leave it in since GI claimed it and it raises the hopes of those waiting for Skyrim.