2001: A Space Odyssey was not just a movie. The Stand was not just a book. Watchmen was not just a comic. Star Trek was not just a tv show. Rancid was not just a punk band. Charlie Sheen was not just a celeb implosion.
These things were more than what was being sold. They were larger then thier definition.
They had umami.
They had a sagittarian range.
They had an aim at a higher artform than thier medium's restrains.
So I ask, will Skyrim be just a game?
OR:
Do you believe skyrim will holds it own as a viable piece of art thirty years from now, through advancement in the industry (based on what we have seen). Like a kubrick film is never dated and is always.... i don't know... more?
No, dear god, no, folks I understand that its easy to be swept up in all the hype surrounding Skyrim. But let's not get carried away. I have no doubt that I will enjoy playing it. I think many of you out there will also enjoy playing it. But will it be the greatest thing of all time? Probably not, and you should really look at Bethesda's track record and the fan divisions their games have if you think otherwise.
Oh and for the record 2001 is just a movie, the Stand was just a book, Watchmen was just a comic book, (don't say graphic novel around Alan Moore, just don't) and Star Trek was just a tv show. Because I know quite a few that didn't care for each one of those examples, or will be happy to point out the flaws in them as well. This whole idea, of "advancing an industry" to me is just silly. First off because while certain ideas caught on, that doesn't mean everyone liked them. (quick time events anyone.) Secondly no one thing should every be credited for said "advancement" because believe me many of those things got there inspiration from somewhere else as well. To quote the bible, "There is nothing new under the sun."
Now please, come down from the stage, opera night was last Friday.