Skyrim to look the same Graphically on all Sytems

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:22 am

How much better looking can it really get, by current gaming PC technology, than what we've seen in screesnhots, anyway?


http://img541.imageshack.us/img541/1149/crysis2a.jpg
User avatar
Leonie Connor
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:18 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 3:14 am

Again, this is not what I was getting at. One poster here insinuated that they would be fine if graphics had never advanced pass the PS1 days. I find it hard to believe that any gamer would hold this opinion, but he holds by his stance. A mans opinion is his own, and I wont argue that.

Still, logically I can't see any reason why a gamer would WANT technology to stagnate, when it is what drive much of the industry we love forward.


Maybe you thought I was trying to make a different point, or attacking oblivion? I assure you I am not. What I said was a self contained response to one or two posters sentiments. Not a blanket statement, or a statement about anything other than their opinions for that matter.







It is "could not care less". Could care less means that you do care.

Hmm, I actually wrote a lot more than that, but somehow it didnt post.
User avatar
Tanya Parra
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 5:15 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 2:25 am

This is true, but they're already going through the trouble of making an entire game, is it really that much more work to add in a few graphical tweaks for PC gamers? It may just be a few tweaks, but they will go a long way. And If money is what they care about, make the damned PC version double the price! I don't care, I would gladly pay that for a game properly made for the PC.

I get the feeling Bethesda is caring less and less about their original PC fan base as time goes on.


As has been said, money is where it's at and that means developers are going to focus their energy on consoles. TBH, sometimes I'm happy that us PC gamers even get a port of a game at all because I've seen more than one situation in which we almost didn't get a game (i.e. TFU off the top of my head). That's becoming more and more the case these days. I just bought a 360 and part of the reason is because of this kind of debate. I'll not be giving up on PC gaming but I'm honestly getting to the point where I feel like I might as well stop fighting the trend and just give in. "When in Rome..."
User avatar
meg knight
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 4:20 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 2:04 pm

http://img541.imageshack.us/img541/1149/crysis2a.jpg

Wouldn't an open-world RPG like Skyrim have much more to process at any given time? Expecting Crysis-level graphics in Skyrim would be expecting too much, in my opinion.
User avatar
Josee Leach
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 10:50 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:40 pm

I wonder if all the Xbox users didn't care about graphics when they first bought their consoles in first place. When Oblivion and Mass Effect looked so realistic and Gears of Wars and Halo were breathtaking. Now it's like everyone is making up excuses to defend their old hardware instead of pressuring Microsoft and Sony to actually upgrade their rigs.

I bought my Xbox because some games I wanted to play were being made exclusively for consoles. And because some types of game are better played on the comfort of your couch, using a joysting. But you have to be really blind in order refuse that consoles -are- getting really old and there's little we can do as players about it. We could, however, express our desires to see consoles catching up with the latest technology instead of sitting here and saying very stupid things like "graphics don't matter" in a VIDEOgame. There are people actually saying well "Morrowind and Daggerfall didn't look so great but the its the gameplay made them entertaining". Those games looked IMPRESSIVE at the time they were released. This is the first time in the Elder Scrolls history where we won't see a GIANT leap in technology.

Visuals have always been the reason why videogames have evolved. Great characters, epic plots, and even gameplay have all existed before in other media. In books, table-top RPGs, Muds, mushes, immersion depended on your imagination. In movies and comic books, it's the imagery that gets you immersed, but you have no degree of control over what's going on. The combination of interaction and graphics is what defines a videogame. The fact you can interact with a visual interface has been the driving force of videogame evolution, otherwise we'd all be playing text MUDs and playing with Ataris.

There's no reason to bash consoles and the status quo of the industry, but for god's sake, how about rethinking that kind of conformist attitude that will get us nowhere in the next 5, 6 years? I can respect people who can't afford a PC that costs thousands of dollars, but that's no reason to expect your hardware will last forever. Long time PC users know all too well how fast things change, but it seems console users, especially those who didn't grow up in the golden era of PC gaming are actually settling for that.

What's the point of wasting millions of dollars on technology research for the next console gen if costumers are more than happy to play on a decade old system? Just keep selling the same stuff and take your profit from a stagnant industry.


Well, console users generally don't really care about technical stuff. Their priority is in the traditional quality of the game. After playing Uncharted 2, the notion of having to "think ahead' went out the window. None of us think our hardware will last "forever", but we don't feel the need to stress a completely new generation of consoles. The key to success is using what you have and expanding all of it's possibilities, and with expensive systems like consoles it is an imperative for developers to harnessing the ultimate power of gaming systems.

Buddy, you need to rethink video games in general. The key to revolutionizing the public view of video games is not in systems or upgrades but what developers bring to the general industry and the uniqueness of the game. Red Dead Redemption, a game I frequently refer to in arguments like this, is a (as of right now) console-exclusive game that has in many ways redefined the "sandbox" genre. At no point in that game was I thinking...."Hey man, what we need is a new Xbox console"

...instead I was thinking, "What else can we do in a game like this?"

Believing that you need to upgrade your system to upgrade your general satisfaction with a game is conformism in of itself.
User avatar
rae.x
 
Posts: 3326
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:13 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 2:22 pm

http://img541.imageshack.us/img541/1149/crysis2a.jpg

/pwnt
User avatar
Louise Andrew
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 8:01 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 10:17 am

Are you guys forgetting that they have a dead line. Not only do they have to fix the spell combat problems but im sure they have other problems as well. They figure that the graphics right now are already stunning maybe if we hold off we can make the game better in many other ways making up for the little lack of graphics.
User avatar
Sxc-Mary
 
Posts: 3536
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 12:53 pm

Post » Mon May 16, 2011 11:56 pm

/pwnt


Wouldn't an open-world RPG like Skyrim have much more to process at any given time? Expecting Crysis-level graphics in Skyrim would be expecting too much, in my opinion.

User avatar
leni
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:58 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 7:47 am

You mean there's a faint shred of hope that Skyrim will run on my, by then, almost 2 year old machine? :celebration:
User avatar
Cartoon
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:31 pm

Post » Mon May 16, 2011 11:58 pm



Agreed, but who was expecting Crysis like graphics?
User avatar
keri seymour
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:09 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:58 am

Wouldn't an open-world RPG like Skyrim have much more to process at any given time? Expecting Crysis-level graphics in Skyrim would be expecting too much, in my opinion.


If they can correctly code it shouldn't be much of problem, should it? Seeing as how they have iD Tech, which has John Carmack... :yes:
User avatar
Naomi Lastname
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:21 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 10:17 am

As has been said, money is where it's at and that means developers are going to focus their energy on consoles. TBH, sometimes I'm happy that us PC gamers even get a port of a game at all because I've seen more than one situation in which we almost didn't get a game (i.e. TFU off the top of my head). That's becoming more and more the case these days. I just bought a 360 and part of the reason is because of this kind of debate. I'll not be giving up on PC gaming but I'm honestly getting to the point where I feel like I might as well stop fighting the trend and just give in. "When in Rome..."


Don't give in, man. Keep fighting the trend. After all, the only real gamers have been and always will be PC gamers.
User avatar
Victor Oropeza
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 4:23 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 2:22 am

When the disparity between PC gaming and consoles becomes large enough, I think you will see people go back towards PC's - or a new console will come out. When Crysis 2 graphics become standard for PC - all console games will just look very dated and they are starting to look dated now. People want new and shiny, not 6 year old tech and by the time Skyrim comes out 7 y.o tech. Could you imagine a AAA company making a game to run a game on a 7 y.o PC as standard?

But like I have always stated - Skyrim pics look excellent and I think most comments by the developers regarding pc/console equality are more marketing driven than based on fact.
User avatar
Anthony Rand
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 5:02 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 10:03 am




It's like saying: "Hey man, did you just see that awesome Lambo? Why can't we all have that type of car?"

Difference is, Mr. Consumer here has four kids, and the guy driving that Lambo bought the car for its looks and speed. Each consumer buys based on what they do. In the same sense, each game runs based on what it has. Skyrim just won't be able to get that much graphical power.
User avatar
Shelby Huffman
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 11:06 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 7:48 am

You mean there's a faint shred of hope that Skyrim will run on my, by then, almost 2 year old machine? :celebration:



A 2 year old PC can run Crysis without issue.

There was never any doubt that a 2 year old PC could run Skyrim perfectly, as a 2 year old PC is much better than a 360 hardware wise, which Skyrim also runs perfectly on.

My rig is more than 2 years old, and will run Skyrim great.
User avatar
Tamara Dost
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 12:20 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 11:46 am

Agreed, but who was expecting Crysis like graphics?

All the people here crying for DX11 that's who.
User avatar
Maeva
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 11:27 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 1:06 pm

Wouldn't an open-world RPG like Skyrim have much more to process at any given time? Expecting Crysis-level graphics in Skyrim would be expecting too much, in my opinion.

Well realistically, is it really expecting too much? PC technology is still way ahead of any of the current generation of the games that are being released. If Bethesda really wanted to (and it would obviously severely limit who could play the game) they could more than easily have Crysis graphics, if not better I think. However, not everyone has a godly gaming computer, so they need to keep the game accessible to as many people as possible.
User avatar
Tom Flanagan
 
Posts: 3522
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:51 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 11:16 am

You mean there's a faint shred of hope that Skyrim will run on my, by then, almost 2 year old machine? :celebration:



Was there any doubt?
User avatar
Sarah MacLeod
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:39 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 2:06 pm

higher resolution, more af, more aa will still make a good difference...but not as good as high res textures and dx10/11.
User avatar
Sammygirl
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 6:15 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 4:24 am

Still, logically I can't see any reason why a gamer would WANT technology to stagnate, when it is what drive much of the industry we love forward.


Because they are afraid the machines will rise up and enslave human kind!
User avatar
Clea Jamerson
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:23 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 6:39 am

True enough, the screens look awesome and I have faith the game will turn out amazing visually.
But despite this...there's this little voice in my head that I can't quite ignore, constantly whispering: "It could look better"
That could just be insanity though. The game will look great for sure.

I understand where you're coming from, I just don't have that nagging feeling myself.
User avatar
sara OMAR
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:18 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 3:39 am

Well realistically, is it really expecting too much? PC technology is still way ahead of any of the current generation of the games that are being released. If Bethesda really wanted to (and it would obviously severely limit who could play the game) they could more than easily have Crysis graphics, if not better I think. However, not everyone has a godly gaming computer, so they need to keep the game accessible to as many people as possible.


Nope. Beth open world + crysis level grfx + 32bit runtime = Not enough memory. period.
User avatar
Shiarra Curtis
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:22 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 3:13 am

What happened to the time when you played a game just to enjoy it? You know, to play the game. The graphics are a significant improvement over Oblivion. Not only that, but the part of the game that matters is getting a massive overhaul. Like somebody else said, we should be thankful we're even getting a PC version given the state of the industry. We'll have to wait until the next generation of consoles before we get balls to the walls graphics for a TES game.

Just play the game, dudes. I frequently play on a 13" TV with my friends. And y'now what, we still have a damn good time.
User avatar
Juan Cerda
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 8:49 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 4:51 am

Nope. Beth open world + crysis level grfx + 32bit runtime = Not enough memory. period.

Whoever said 32bit run time? I was referring to 64bit. I'm talking about what the technology is now and where it's going. If they wanted to, they could pull it off. Again, it would SEVERELY limit who could play the game. Aside from us few who have top of the line gaming computers.
User avatar
jenny goodwin
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 4:57 am

Post » Mon May 16, 2011 11:40 pm

One the topic of Crysis, for console examples of a similar game, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4DOtCxSJvg&feature=related
User avatar
Nims
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 3:29 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim