Which makes for three strikes against it.
'Strike' 1. "It's too small"
'Strike' 2. "The curvature is wrong."
'Strike' 3. "The curvature is wrong." - again?
All valid points. And clearly well thought out might I add.
Can I think of a better one? Sure, given it's size and angle it's seen from, I think it could be a bovine or minotaur horn.
Yeah, too bad I already mentioned that. Seems like you actually read my post and took this directly from it or else I really doubt you would have used the word 'bovine'.
there is no evidence in favor of, but plenty of evidence against
Name one such bit of evidence.
And after looking at some pictures of cow horns, I found http://i.ehow.co.uk/images/a06/7k/bk/anatomy-cow-horns-800X800.jpg. That looks like a pretty similar shape to me.
Lol nowhere close. I think http://www.rarebreeds.co.nz/texas3.jpg is a far better example. But I've already stated the problems with it belonging to a minotaur.
Now compare it to http://www.joshuarue.com/mammoth_skull.jpg and it looks completely off.
It's a make-believe
secondary tusk. Where's your evidence now?