No duh those kind of landscapes won't be in! Do you have any idea how much memory it would take to have landscapes like that? And then add in any creatures, NPCs, settlements, etc. and it could just never fit! A landscape like that would take ALL DAY to traverse, so does anyone really want to sit and walk up and down a mountain for an ENTIRE DAY? It would look pretty, but it would get INCREDIBLY boring after a while. You can only walk past so many trees before you're like "Ok, this isn't as cool as I thought it would be".
You guys make me shake my head sometimes with your ridiculous expectations. Until games are produced on Blu-ray sized (55GB) discs, landscapes like this will NOT happen. I don't even think any PS3 exclusive games have anything even close to those, anyway.
Just Cause 2 is the closest there is to these landscapes, but that game doesn't have half of the depth of a TES game.
Haha it's definitely not a ridiculous expectation to have a game 70-100 square kilometers.
Besides, you're using the straw man fallacy. I'm talking about 70-100 square kilometers. In order to "sit and walk up down a mountain for an ENTIRE day" it would require something around 1500-4000 square kilometers. In other words, don't use the straw man fallacy
The images I posted could very well be in Skyrim - but in a ridiculously small scale. 70-100 square kilometers would help with that a bit. Making it feel a bit more believable and less cramped up.
Again, straw man fallacy concerning Just Cause 2. I didn't even mention that. Just Cause 2 is 1000 square kilometers and nobody has said it can be compared to TES in terms of depth and content, since it's an entirely different game.