Skyrim was rushed because of Mass Effect 3

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:02 pm

Interesting theory, but the truth is actually the complete opposite.

Mass Effect 3 was scheduled for a late 2011 release until Skyrim was announced for an 11.11.11 release - Bioware then promptly pushed ME3 back to 2012.

Source: http://content.usatoday.com/communities/gamehunters/post/2011/05/mass-effect-3-release-pushed-back-to-2012/1


This.
Also, it was more likely Bioware didn't want ME3 to clash with their own release of SWTOR.
But by doing so, they'll have another RPG powerhouse to face off in 2012.......Diablo 3.
User avatar
Hope Greenhaw
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 8:44 pm

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:58 pm

.Skyrim? It's just another notch in my bed post.

The least they could've done was make the shallow, shell of a game features function correctly. The game is a mile wide but a quarter of an inch deep. No memorable characters and the plot is less interesting than the side-quests.


If it now is such a bad game and, as you say, a shallow, shell of a game, then why are you here crying, whining and moaning about it? Just drop it and move on already.
User avatar
Blaine
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 4:24 pm

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:35 am

I don't think there's any competition. Mass Effect will never appeal to an audience as big as Skyrim has, theres much less freedom in Mass Effect games and I believe it very much appeals to Sci-Fi fans whereas, given the freedom that Skyrim gives, it doesnt just appeal to fantasy RPG fans. I know many people that have bought Skyrim and have no intention of getting Mass Effect.


Agreed. Got tired of the "sole hero who must save Earth while the galatic government brands him/her an insane loon" plot fast. The fact that Earth is getting invaded makes me not want to play it anymore. :/

But I suppose some people love playing Mass Effect.
User avatar
Naomi Ward
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 8:37 pm

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 6:20 am

Yeah OP, i merged your two threads, cuz they were basically the same-ish.
User avatar
мistrєss
 
Posts: 3168
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 3:13 am

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:15 pm

Yeah I know. Five years is too short a time for developing a game. Maybe they'll wait ten before the next one!

:facepalm:
User avatar
Heather M
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:40 am

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 9:41 pm

Agreed. Got rather tired of the "sole hero who must save Earth while the galatic government brands him/her an insane loon" plot fast.

But I suppose some people love playing Mass Effect.

It was good before EA [censored] up the series.
User avatar
Jerry Cox
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:21 pm

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 5:59 pm

It was good before EA [censored] up the series.


Bioware was purchased by EA before the first ME game was finished.

EA has their name and influence on every game in the series.
User avatar
Haley Cooper
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:30 am

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:05 pm

Agreed. Got tired of the "sole hero who must save Earth while the galatic government brands him/her an insane loon" plot fast. The fact that Earth is getting invaded makes me not want to play it anymore. :/

But I suppose some people love playing Mass Effect.

So you're not bored of the 'sole hero who must save the earth from dragons while everyone else in the gameworld seems pretty much ignorant of your efforts' plot?
User avatar
Tanya Parra
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 5:15 am

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:52 pm

Hey, I won't berate ME3 - it'll probably be worth one playthrough at maybe 20 hours to see how much of a jerk I can be to the universe.

That being said - just because you have game breaking issues with this game, OP (that weren't fleshed out until others said they had no game breaking issues, but whatever, right?) - the majority of people playing this game don't. And those that do generally have patience and don't troll about Skyrim being rushed because it didn't change it's release date back to match ME3 or something. God, you speak such garbage.
User avatar
Susan
 
Posts: 3536
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:46 am

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 4:52 pm

....Er just no mass effect had become bad after the 2nd one when all you do is help your whiny ass team do what they want for about 3/5ths of the game and when they took out the fact you could explore TONS of other planets and no be alarmed about whats on the planet by a A.I you never knew what you would find on those planets plus they just half assed the weapons, Cant wait to see how they [censored] up in mass effect 3.
User avatar
Robert Jackson
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:39 am

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 4:28 pm

I am convinced that Bethesda rushed Skyrim and released it with all of these bugs because Mass Effect 3 will be released early 2012. That way Skyrim can get game of the year without much competition.


I am convinced that marshmallows are actually the eggs of our parent-species overlords.

See? I, too, can make outlandish remarks about anything based on nothing more than my opinion.
User avatar
Javier Borjas
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:34 pm

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:21 am

So? I'm gonna buy ME3 anyways.
User avatar
Naazhe Perezz
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 6:14 am

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 12:22 pm

They delivered a very buggy game that so far 2 patches has been able to fix.

Instead of delivering on 11/11/11 they should have pushed it back and took the time to do it right.

I'd rather not wait for some date in 2023 to get Skyrim - That's how long it takes to "Get it right"
User avatar
Maya Maya
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:35 pm

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:00 pm

Truth, ME and ME2 are amazing games, and Bethesda could take some lessons on Character dialouge and quest progression choices and consequences. Bioware knows how to make a game.

And Bioware could learn a little about world building/level design from Beth, also, there really were no consequences that I remember.
User avatar
Laura Elizabeth
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:34 pm

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 6:51 pm

Pretty smart here.

You know, I don't think Mass Effect 3 was announced for 2012 when they announced Skyrim for 11 11 11.
User avatar
adame
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:57 am

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 5:48 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35TbGjt-weA
User avatar
Liii BLATES
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:41 am

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 5:59 pm

no.
User avatar
M!KkI
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 7:50 am

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:29 pm

no.

User avatar
Dalia
 
Posts: 3488
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 12:29 pm

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 9:40 pm

Mass Effect is far below TES. TES is on a scale above normal games. Hence the 5 year development cycle.
User avatar
Andres Lechuga
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:47 pm

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:18 pm

If you compare Mass Effect 2 sold almost twice as many units as Oblivion did in it's first week. Going by those statistics, why would Bethesda try to release Skyrim around Mass Effect 3. What other reason could there be for Skyrim being released with so many game breaking bugs, that two patches couldn't even fix? Did Bethesda want Christmas sales?


The basis behind the numbers are not going to work within the timeline for one thing. I take you are definitely using console game sales, which overall, Oblivion blows ME2 out of the water, just on the 360 alone by nearly 1m units, the PS3 version of Oblivion sold 10x more than ME2 did on the PS3 but let me expand on that and this makes these numbers even more shocking; Oblivion was released when the 360 barely had a 3m consoles sold in March of 2006 when Oblivion was released, yet Oblivion has sold 3.3m units on just that platform (I'll avoid showing the PS3 numbers, they are way over the top), yet ME2 has only sold about 2.5m on the 360. Keep in mind ME 2 was released when the 360 console install base was around 38m. What does that say when at even a year later after Oblivion's release, there were about 11m 360 consoles sold. What would those numbers be had Oblivion came out when ME2 did?
User avatar
Guinevere Wood
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 3:06 pm

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 6:47 pm

The basis behind the numbers are not going to work within the timeline for one thing. I take you are definitely using console game sales, which overall, Oblivion blows ME2 out of the water, just on the 360 alone by nearly 1m units, the PS3 version of Oblivion sold 10x more than ME2 did on the PS3 but let me expand on that and this makes these numbers even more shocking; Oblivion was released when the 360 barely had a 3m consoles sold in March of 2006 when Oblivion was released, yet Oblivion has sold 3.3m units on just that platform (I'll avoid showing the PS3 numbers, they are way over the top), yet ME2 has only sold about 2.5m on the 360. Keep in mind ME 2 was released when the 360 console install base was around 38m. What does that say when at even a year later after Oblivion's release, there were about 11m 360 consoles sold. What would those numbers be had Oblivion came out when ME2 did?

That's true - in fact, I know quite a few people who BOUGHT a 360 - at the time when the price was still a bit up there - for Oblivion.
User avatar
The Time Car
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 7:13 pm

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:06 pm

That's true - in fact, I know quite a few people who BOUGHT a 360 - at the time when the price was still a bit up there - for Oblivion.


I bought into the 360 when it was released in Nov of "05", and to my dismay, was totally bummed that Oblivion was put off for almost 4 more months. Oblivion was one of the reasons why I bought into console. I loved Morrowind on the o.g. Xbox, but the PC version was way better. I love Beth game (RPGS period) that I have bought them on both platforms. I have Morrowind, Oblivion, Fallout 3 on both the 360 and PC. Only New Vegas and Skyrim did I stick with the PC version. I am done playing RPGs on consoles, they jsut don't fit, because of the inability to mod and create your own item the way you want. If consoles would allow that, I may reconsider.

Too emphasize my point on Beth games, they are the only makers of RPGs where I bought them on console as well. The only other RPG(s) I bought on console that I did get on PC as well from another company was KoTOR and Mass Effect. But those game was exclusive to the Xbox/360 for months before the PC versions came out and I couldn't wait. All other Bioware games since and before are strictly PC and always will be (if I buy from them anymore).
User avatar
Devils Cheek
 
Posts: 3561
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:24 pm

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:09 am

Lol you honestly thought skyrim would cower before mass effect 3?
pfft. :meh:
User avatar
Sierra Ritsuka
 
Posts: 3506
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:56 am

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:59 am

I can name off half a dozen companies that each give out a GOTY award. So no, They released it on the date it was released because it is a memorable date, one that won't occur again for another century
User avatar
Chris Ellis
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:00 am

Post » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:56 am

I can name off half a dozen companies that each give out a GOTY award. So no, They released it on the date it was released because it is a memorable date, one that won't occur again for another century


No, it will happen in one more year, 12-12-12. You said memorable date, not just specifically 11-11-11. Personally, I'd rather they waited another year to really polish the game, but the next gen of consoles is supposed to be out then, so sales would be very small when most avid gamers would be buying into that next-gen. Of course that is just a guess.
User avatar
Rachael Williams
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:43 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim