I think it's so unfair if you are a light armour (that's how us English people spell it... The correct way

Ok, I'll accept that there are more varieties of heavy armour than light, but why do the two best (ebony and daedric - not including dragon as that's either/or) have to both be above the best light (glass).
Ideally I think an extra class should be made in the light armour side, that would sit (stat wise) above ebony but below daedric.
I mean it's not so much the armour that bothers me as it is the weapons. I'm a thief/assassin so I wear light armour - but why does that mean my bow and daggers have to be sub-par to my heavy-armoured-tank counterparts?
Maybe the whole tree could change from an anvil to a hammer (stay with me)...
You start with 'basic' which would give you iron and hide and go straight up the 'handle':
* perk 1 = 'novice' - steel and leather
* perk 2 = 'apprentice' - plate and scale
* perk 3 = 'adept' - orcish and elven (with a split off to upgrade enchanted above here)
* perk 4 = 'expert' - dwarven and glass
* perk 5 = 'master' - ebony and (mythril?)
* perks 6+7 = 'grand-master' + 'dragon' - daedric and dragon (splitting left and right to form the head of the hammer).
A light daedric wouldn't be too un-imaginable either would it? I saw a screenshot of the Skyrim daedric armour and it looks awesome! So jealous in my dragonscale lol.
What do you guys think?