From what I see in both games, they do relatively the same things -

Hunters smash around shipyard containers and they fly,

Heavy Units smash around cars and they fly,

Hunters have a heavy cannon that can kill in one hit direct shot,

Heavy Units have a HMG that can kill with fire-rate,

Both have very poor back protection,

Both Are encased in heavy armor and have instances of exposed flesh,

Both high tolerance to bullet resistance,

Both are susceptible to heavy munitions, this one really is a tough one.

They're both about 15-20ft tall.

Hunter, the difference between them is that the hunters armour is invincible from most parts. so head on the hunter would win.

Also the hunter does seem to sprint about every now and then which ive yet to see a devastator do.

Erm..what is a Hunter? :<

Also the hunter does seem to sprint about every now and then which ive yet to see a devastator do.
I think you mean the opposite, right?
Hunter = spider
Devastator/heavy = tank with legs

Evenly matched? Lol.

Erm..what is a Hunter? :<

http://www.incrysis.com/wiki/images/1/12/Alien_hunter.jpg
http://www.incrysis.com/wiki/images/0/09/Alien_hunter2.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4uWXY_VOiw
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x27qdd_crysis-dx9vsdx10-hunter_videogames

Hunter > Anything in Crysis 2.

You friggin boobs lol, Not the crysis hunter, the Halo Hunter.

Why on earth would the OP compare the devastator to a crysis 1 hunter?


vs

Considering that this is a Crysis forum, there is a Ceph unit called the Hunter and on top of that most people here are PC players who have access to well, quite frankly, better FPS games than Halo.. the OP should have clarified it a little better.

Hunters always go in pairs, Devastators dont, they're dorks that cant pull.

This is nowhere evenly matched. Hunters, while powerful, have an enormous weak spot on their backs. It also doesn't help when Hunters are extremely easy to flank. Plus the only weapon the Hunters really have at their disposal is the Fule Rod Cannon, which has an extremely low rate of fire. Heavy Units easily out gun them.

This is nowhere evenly matched. Hunters, while powerful, have an enormous weak spot on their backs. It also doesn't help when Hunters are extremely easy to flank. Plus the only weapon the Hunters really have at their disposal is the Fule Rod Cannon, which has an extremely low rate of fire. Heavy Units easily out gun them.
who here has actually played halo past halo CE?


Both units have weak backs
although easy to flank, so is the devastator, and neither of them are good at flanking.
The hunter does not have a slow fuel rod cannon, it has a continous beam now, and even if it had a fuel rod cannon it would outgun the devastator, big ball of plasma/alien rocketlauncher > alien ice gun.

and again, the hunter from the front was pretty much invincible, its armour didnt fall to peices like the devastators and its armour covers much more.

This is nowhere evenly matched. Hunters, while powerful, have an enormous weak spot on their backs. It also doesn't help when Hunters are extremely easy to flank. Plus the only weapon the Hunters really have at their disposal is the Fule Rod Cannon, which has an extremely low rate of fire. Heavy Units easily out gun them.
who here has actually played halo past halo CE?


Both units have weak backs
although easy to flank, so is the devastator, and neither of them are good at flanking.
The hunter does not have a slow fuel rod cannon, it has a continous beam now, and even if it had a fuel rod cannon it would outgun the devastator, big ball of plasma/alien rocketlauncher > alien ice gun.

and again, the hunter from the front was pretty much invincible, its armour didnt fall to peices like the devastators and its armour covers much more.
Actually, I made that post so I wouldn't sound like a Halo fanboy, because apparently I'm one of the 2 people rooting for Master Chief back on the other two vs threads, and I'm getting negative PM's of people calling me a "fanboy" who "hasn't played Crysis" because of it. So I made that post to shut them up.

This is nowhere evenly matched. Hunters, while powerful, have an enormous weak spot on their backs. It also doesn't help when Hunters are extremely easy to flank. Plus the only weapon the Hunters really have at their disposal is the Fule Rod Cannon, which has an extremely low rate of fire. Heavy Units easily out gun them.
who here has actually played halo past halo CE?


Both units have weak backs
although easy to flank, so is the devastator, and neither of them are good at flanking.
The hunter does not have a slow fuel rod cannon, it has a continous beam now, and even if it had a fuel rod cannon it would outgun the devastator, big ball of plasma/alien rocketlauncher > alien ice gun.

and again, the hunter from the front was pretty much invincible, its armour didnt fall to peices like the devastators and its armour covers much more.
Actually, I made that post so I wouldn't sound like a Halo fanboy, because apparently I'm one of the 2 people rooting for Master Chief back on the other two vs threads, and I'm getting negative PM's of people calling me a "fanboy" who "hasn't played Crysis" because of it. So I made that post to shut them up.
in the other 2 threads MC would win, your not a fanboy for understanding that, they are just halo hateboys.

in the other 2 threads MC would win, your not a fanboy for understanding that, they are just halo hateboys.
Had to do it in order to shut them up.