Something I noticed regarding NV pricing

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:54 pm

Alex if fo was a map nodes turn based game with no combat not as many people would buy it as what s needed. I mean if it had no combat and was map nodes I wouldn t even buy it. Why would you want it to die again?????? I like nv enough that I would buy another Obsidian/Bethesda fo. I understand there were some problems with the number of Enclave in fo3, but broke lore on every front??? I have to hear about this.

No combat? Please, don't talk unless you know what you are talking about, because you surely do not.

And that last post was a joke, hence it being so verbose.
User avatar
BrEezy Baby
 
Posts: 3478
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:22 am

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:46 am

[censored]!

I love Bethesda games, lemme stick up your butt, I LOVE, LOVE Bethesda games.

There are many things wrong with FNV. Its not hard enough, too much combat, not enough lore, not realistic, no map nodes, graphics svck, combat svcks.

Even with those issues, it is a major step in the right direction toward Fallout 1, which is undeniably the best Fallout game of all time. And I agree, Bethesda games are fun, but they ruined Fallout lore, cant you [censored] understand that? Why can't you?

What is Activision took the Elder Scrolls, turned it into a racing game, and broke lore on almost every front. How would you feel?

too much combat in new vegas ?, are you serious ? they prob could of gotten away with less combat but the map is pretty empty, there's not much to explore so with little combat and not a lot of exploration, whats left ? a mediocre story? the game didn't stand out in any areas really.
User avatar
TIhIsmc L Griot
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 6:59 pm

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:59 pm

too much combat in new vegas ?, are you serious ? they prob could of gotten away with less combat but the map is pretty empty, there's not much to explore so with little combat and not a lot of exploration, whats left ? a mediocre story? the game didn't stand out in any areas really.

Well, i dont disagree about the lack of combat or the static-ness of the map, but i think the story is not at all mediocre, it is quite excellent in my opinion. As i have told Ace, i would greatly like regional npc spawn, like, if you are by water, you may see lakelurks or legionarries, if you are near dry lakes, you would see more insects, by a settlement, more dogs or raiders, stuff like that.
User avatar
Batricia Alele
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:12 am

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:43 am

Ohhh god there is elements in what you're saying is correct like i have talked to the dinosaurs who don't seem to be big bethesda fan but it's not the witch hunt you make it out to be and yes fonv really lacks in replayability but it has a superior main story and im a huge fan of fo3 it's my fav game of all time but i still love fonv it's probably my 2nd fav game of all time so it's not been a let down to me and who cares if theres more generic shack then there should be.Jeez are you the exploration police ?

i agree with west, he's not the only one who noticed there isn't a lot to explore in new vegas, its pretty basic, you can find that on the internet all over the place, everyone knows the exploration isn't anything close to FO3.
User avatar
Veronica Martinez
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 9:43 am

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:38 pm

i agree with west, he's not the only one who noticed there isn't a lot to explore in new vegas, its pretty basic, you can find that on the internet all over the place, everyone knows the exploration isn't anything close to FO3.

I found plenty of stuff to explore, but the places werent dungeons that were in place for grinding for xp and loot, i explore in NV, to explore, and i do that, often.
User avatar
Janine Rose
 
Posts: 3428
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:59 pm

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:41 pm

Well, i dont disagree about the lack of combat or the static-ness of the map, but i think the story is not at all mediocre, it is quite excellent in my opinion. As i have told Ace, i would greatly like regional npc spawn, like, if you are by water, you may see lakelurks or legionarries, if you are near dry lakes, you would see more insects, by a settlement, more dogs or raiders, stuff like that.

well i agree, i didn't mean it to seem the story was bad, i thought it was good, i just think they implememented it very well and gave you lots of options and plenty of ways to do the quests so in all those areas i give obsidian a high score.
User avatar
Budgie
 
Posts: 3518
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 2:26 pm

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:12 am

well i agree, i didn't mean it to seem the story was bad, i thought it was good, i just think they implememented it very well and gave you lots of options and plenty of ways to do the quests so in all those areas i give obsidian a high score.

I'm sure if they had the time, people, and resources, they could have done better in other areas, but i am glad they prioritized story and setting.
User avatar
SHAWNNA-KAY
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:22 pm

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:28 pm

No combat? Please, don't talk unless you know what you are talking about, because you surely do not.

And that last post was a joke, hence it being so verbose.

He says there was too much combat right in it, meaning he want less combat. Any less combat we will be playing post apocalyptic sims. He says he wants map nodes back. I have no proof, but if people knew map nodes were in the next fo 65-80% of prior sales would be gone. Then you d get you wish and Bethesda would drop fo. Better hope Obsidian can pick it up and sell enough to keep it going. Then Bethesda could create their own post apocalyptic rpg/action adventure/survival horror game from scratch.

That might be the best thing. couldn t replaced pa or bos or the whole fo story,but everyone would get what they wanted.

I now think Bethesda should dump fo, and create their own post apocalyptic rpg/action adventure/survival horror game. Its the best thing......
User avatar
Rebekah Rebekah Nicole
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:47 pm

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:09 pm

I d miss vaults and sm and all the 50s fo time split, but it would work

They could call it man made winter. I could be great..... I think I ll get on the horn to Bethesda big wigs. They ll listen to me.....lol

They might even put me in charge to help get it off the ground.
User avatar
Dylan Markese
 
Posts: 3513
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:58 am

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:57 pm

There is a valid point somewhere behind what west is putting out, but the problem here is, that west does not discuss that point. Instead he spouts broad generalizations (which he obviously wants to be true, though he can't possibly know) as facts, ridicules the opposition with commets of being in denial, and then puts out the very same thing he did just before, and after a while the same happens again with same arguments only with slightly different wording. This has been going on for a while already with no progression or any kind of discussion, so I'd say asking him to stop is natural reaction from other posters. With all due respect to west, of course.


Couldn't have said it better. Heck, I've also even noticed some F3 players getting annoyed with his behaviour too.

I actually don't mind if he hates NV, what I mind is how he makes those ugly sweeping comments, where he basicly thinks he speaks for the whole community.
Damn, we had a backseat moderator, and now what? Backseat PR manager? :shrug:
User avatar
Skrapp Stephens
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:04 am

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 8:44 pm

and if we bring up anything bad about Fallout 3, we are Beth-hating evil people, but it is totally fine to bash nv because you dont like it.


Yeah, I was wondering that.

A tiny dislike of any aspect of Fallout = Beth haters, regardless of how much we did enjoy Fallout 3 or any other Bethesda game.

I've not seen any of us 'old school fans' calling them Obsidian haters or that their blind hatred of anything Obsidian blinds them to how great New Vegas is.

A word jumps to mind. Hypocrisy. There are other words to for what West and Rook are doing.
User avatar
JD bernal
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 8:10 am

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 8:33 pm

He says there was too much combat right in it, meaning he want less combat. Any less combat we will be playing post apocalyptic sims. He says he wants map nodes back. I have no proof, but if people knew map nodes were in the next fo 65-80% of prior sales would be gone. Then you d get you wish and Bethesda would drop fo. Better hope Obsidian can pick it up and sell enough to keep it going. Then Bethesda could create their own post apocalyptic rpg/action adventure/survival horror game from scratch.

That might be the best thing. couldn t replaced pa or bos or the whole fo story,but everyone would get what they wanted.

I now think Bethesda should dump fo, and create their own post apocalyptic rpg/action adventure/survival horror game. Its the best thing......

i think you're on to something rook, bethesda should make their own post apocalyptic franchise, that way the old fallout game fans won't complain about bethesda not making the game more like the original fo games.
User avatar
kristy dunn
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:08 am

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:42 am

Fallout NV is still $49.99 for the PC here, I checked Gamestop website and it says $19.99 and even asked the clerk, his response was "We just have one copy left" LOL Ah well.

I have it for the 360 but wanted to pick it up for the PC also cause of the mods etc. etc. everyone always talks about.
User avatar
Peter lopez
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:55 pm

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:29 am

i think you're on to something rook, bethesda should make their own post apocalyptic franchise, that way the old fallout game fans won't complain about bethesda not making the game more like the original fo games.

Yeah the fo story line and the 50s time split is so good it could never be replaced.

A new game would not be the same in those areas, but they can think of something. I m sure they ll call me for help lol.....

Then Obsidian or Interplay (I pretty sure they are still around, because I read they want to make a on line fo spin off by 2012 but didn t seem sure they had the money) could pick fo and make it a map nodes turn bases rpg with little to no combat and a lot of talking. I just assumed old fo had combat, but going by what alex said I guess I was wrong. They could start with fo3.2 and Bethesdas fo3 could be struck from the records and they could call it the burned game.2.

Everyone would be so happy!!!!!!!!
User avatar
Laura
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:11 am

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:15 pm

The prices where funny here in Sweden. One place I go to from time to time has it for 500 for the PC on release day. A week later it was down to 250. Two months later it was up at 400 and angry customers complaining about the price raise :P
User avatar
Jack Moves
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:51 am

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:56 pm

Yeah the fo story line and the 50s time split is so good it could never be replaced.

A new game would not be the same in those areas, but they can think of something. I m sure they ll call me for help lol.....


Yeah, they need someone to stomp down on the garbage in the bins.

Then Obsidian or Interplay (I pretty sure they are still around, because I read they want to make a on line fo spin off by 2012 but didn t seem sure they had the money) could pick fo and make it a map nodes turn bases rpg with little to no combat and a lot of talking.


I just love how you can make such statements about what a Fallout game should be when you clearly haven't played the originals.

I just assumed old fo had combat, but going by what alex said I guess I was wrong.


When did he say that? Well, we've had opinions presented as facts and shoved in our faces. We've had broad, sweeping and somewhat insulting generalizations. Are you now going to start twisting words to suit your own viewpoint? Or maybe just go ahead and put words in the mouths of others?



They could start with fo3.2 and Bethesdas fo3 could be struck from the records and they could call it the burned game.2.


And the last of your credibility disappears.

Everyone would be so happy!!!!!!!!


Nope, just you and Westoftherockies (Or is it Yellowstone occasionally?).
User avatar
Isaac Saetern
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:46 pm

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:31 pm

Yeah, I was wondering that.

A tiny dislike of any aspect of Fallout = Beth haters, regardless of how much we did enjoy Fallout 3 or any other Bethesda game.

I've not seen any of us 'old school fans' calling them Obsidian haters or that their blind hatred of anything Obsidian blinds them to how great New Vegas is.

A word jumps to mind. Hypocrisy. There are other words to for what West and Rook are doing.

All I see is bashing and talk that fo3 ruined fo. I don t see anyone slip in anything good about it while they r bashing it. No I frequently say good things about nv too, because I really do not have an agenda. I understand what OG is saying, but it got sold it s like 14 years later they should have expected some changes.

Don t group me in with West just because I agreed with him once. I always discuss, so I understand better. I learn more of OGs side every day. I just never knew it was like this till I spent some time here.
User avatar
Danii Brown
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:13 am

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:01 pm

All I see is bashing and talk that fo3 ruined fo. I don t see anyone slip in anything good about it while they r bashing it. No I frequently say good things about nv too, because I really do not have an agenda. I understand what OG is saying, but it got sold it s like 14 years later they should have expected some changes.

Don t group me in with West just because I agreed with him once. I always discuss, so I understand better. I learn more of OGs side every day. I just never knew it was like this till I spent some time here.



Yet you make statements like this.

The thing is the only people on here that see absolutely nothing wrong with nv and every thind wrong with fo3 is the old fanbase.

Old fanbase if blinded so much by their hatred of Bethesda they fail to see that Bethesda s fallout was alot more fun.



Nobody has said New Vegas is perfect. Nor has anyone said Fallout 3 runined the series.

You have quotes or proof? Please post.

But the idea that a dislike of something in Fallout 3 or a preference of New Vegas over Fallout 3 translates to hatred of Bethesda is an insulting generalization.
User avatar
Felix Walde
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 4:50 pm

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:23 pm

Yeah, they need someone to stomp down on the garbage in the bins.












When did he say that? Well, we've had opinions presented as facts and shoved in our faces. We've had broad, sweeping and somewhat insulting generalizations. Are you now going to start twisting words to suit your own viewpoint? Or maybe just go ahead and put words in the mouths of others?.

He says nv has too much combat. Any less and there would be none 1 or 2 shoting a fire gecko does not count as combat. Black Mountain is combat...

I was misquoted myself, someone put quotes arould "old" in old fallout fans when they replied to me, but I was like 10 when original nintendo was out, so why would I call the fans old??? I am old!!!!!!!!!

I mean old games "old fo fan base" not "old" fo fan base. Games made in the 90s are ancient relics when looking at what they ve become today.

He says fo 3 broke lore on every front. Sounds bad to me....
User avatar
JaNnatul Naimah
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:33 am

Post » Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:15 am

Yet you make statements like this.




Nobody has said New Vegas is perfect. Nor has anyone said Fallout 3 runined the series.

You have quotes or proof? Please post.

But the idea that a dislike of something in Fallout 3 or a preference of New Vegas over Fallout 3 translates to hatred of Bethesda is an insulting generalization.

I m not going to go around and collect quotes, because i ll probably do it wrong. They r all over....... It not so much a hated for Bethesda them selves, but Bethesdas Fallout.

It makes me sad to see this, because I thought it was great then I spend some time on here and find there is a mini war in almost every thread. A jab here or shot there...... Even threads that don t turn into vs. threads have some jabs.

You guys can have any story line you want even 27 endings, but you can t waste the giant open world map like nv did. "Mindless exploring" is what i ve spent my time doing in the last 2 fo.
User avatar
IsAiah AkA figgy
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 7:43 am

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 9:19 pm

I m not going to go around and collect quotes, because i ll probably do it wrong. They r all over....... It not so much a hated for Bethesda them selves, but Bethesdas Fallout.


Then I would wonder of they really ever existed.


Btw. I remeber the thread you mention in this quote from earlier in the thread.

They did that because I came on and flipped out about the xbox live dlc deal and told them I wasn t buying it again when I swithed to PS3.

I told them I d wait 2 years for some goty edition, and I d by it used. I also called Bethesda out for flaming, because it states right in the fourm rules that we can t put each other down for which platform we play on. Well Bethesda put pc and ps3 users down. I told the mods that Bethesda should get 2 flame warnings. The post got locked in like 2mins, but they got the message. Not even 2 months later the dlc was out, the other dlcs will come out simultaneously on all platfoms, and they dropped the price $30 00. Yeah, that was because of me. I bought another brand new copy just for them, because I knew they knew that what they did was wrong.


The bolded parts are hilarious btw. Microsoft only paid for exclusivity FOR ONE DLC. It had nothing to do with you. Seriously, ego much?
User avatar
Clea Jamerson
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:23 pm

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 9:51 pm

Yeah the fo story line and the 50s time split is so good it could never be replaced.

A new game would not be the same in those areas, but they can think of something. I m sure they ll call me for help lol.....

Then Obsidian or Interplay (I pretty sure they are still around, because I read they want to make a on line fo spin off by 2012 but didn t seem sure they had the money) could pick fo and make it a map nodes turn bases rpg with little to no combat and a lot of talking. I just assumed old fo had combat, but going by what alex said I guess I was wrong. They could start with fo3.2 and Bethesdas fo3 could be struck from the records and they could call it the burned game.2.

Everyone would be so happy!!!!!!!!

There was plenty of combat in the old games as well as non combat solutions. Though if your Outdoorsman skill was high enough, you could skip most of it.
User avatar
TASTY TRACY
 
Posts: 3282
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 7:11 pm

Post » Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:10 am

Then I would wonder of they really ever existed.


Btw. I remeber the thread you mention in this quote from earlier in the thread.



The bolded parts are hilarious btw. Microsoft only paid for exclusivity FOR ONE DLC. It had nothing to do with you. Seriously, ego much?

That was supposed to make people laugh. They really don t care what I said. If they saw the one where I called them out for flaming they had to have got a kick out of it.

I bashed Bethesda bad during that period of time
User avatar
Adrian Powers
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:44 pm

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:15 pm

Now you can bash nv all you want, but I wont stand for u bashing DM without a discussion. Did u play DM on hardcoe???????

What was your problem with dead money.?????????? huh????

Lets hear it.

where should I start oh that stupid ass collar and the annoying beeping,almost the entire DlC was copy paste,only 1 new enemy,getting lost when am trying to explore,and stupid purple/orange tint, the holograms wtf,and if u have a low endurance character you are going to have a very hard time playing.
User avatar
Laura Samson
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:36 pm

Post » Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:45 pm

stupid ass collar and the annoying beeping,almost the entire ,getting lost purple/orange tint, the holograms very hard time .

So you didn t like it because it challenged you in many different ways??????

Then it did its job......

Do you play on hard core??????

I read what Chris Avellone had to say about DM on his twitter, and I think he d be very happy to read your post. It sounds like that is what he was aiming for. (Well not the part about copy paste, but I cut that out of your quote anyway for my own purposes)
User avatar
sarah taylor
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:36 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout: New Vegas