Yeah the fo story line and the 50s time split is so good it could never be replaced.
A new game would not be the same in those areas, but they can think of something. I m sure they ll call me for help lol.....
Yeah, they need someone to stomp down on the garbage in the bins.
Then Obsidian or Interplay (I pretty sure they are still around, because I read they want to make a on line fo spin off by 2012 but didn t seem sure they had the money) could pick fo and make it a map nodes turn bases rpg with little to no combat and a lot of talking.
I just love how you can make such statements about what a Fallout game should be when you clearly haven't played the originals.
I just assumed old fo had combat, but going by what alex said I guess I was wrong.
When did he say that? Well, we've had opinions presented as facts and shoved in our faces. We've had broad, sweeping and somewhat insulting generalizations. Are you now going to start twisting words to suit your own viewpoint? Or maybe just go ahead and put words in the mouths of others?
They could start with fo3.2 and Bethesdas fo3 could be struck from the records and they could call it the burned game.2.
And the last of your credibility disappears.
Everyone would be so happy!!!!!!!!
Nope, just you and Westoftherockies (Or is it Yellowstone occasionally?).