» Thu Nov 13, 2008 12:56 pm
i no this is a very good game but i don't get all the people ignoring the fact thats it not how it should be, it is slighty blurred and jagged and although can look real good, its just kind of ruind by this, its like your eyes haveto upcale it for you to enjoy it as it should be.
yes the PS3 is closer to the PC version with more particles in the air superior lighting compared to Xbox and its not missing grapihcs such as running water and things in places., an things that are far away from you. the PS3 graphics for this game are better but because of that, if they brought the game out as it would have been it would have shown up the Xbox, so they just did a few cliks of a button to lower the resolution a little and make the colours appear more dull with less bloom to them. none of this effect's the performance of the game or makes it better, dont think that, dont assume that, it doesn't.this is becaus theyv’e obviously had a deal with Micro$oft.
When they were making the game [or doing all the finishing touches] about a year ago they stated that the PS3 version looks and plays better than the Xbox 360's. Micro$oft heard that and didn't like it at all because it could ruin the Xbox at this time, say they obviosly got in their with they money and gave them an offer they cant refuse this is becaus theyv’e obviously had a deal with Micro$oft.
i mean take what happened with the demo… they done a horribly old build or 360 port making the PS3 version look bad and worse than it actually is [i still don't think the multiplayer is too much improved from the demo, apart from the server issues they are fine]. and with all the complaints they never said one word or made any statements. dont you think Crytek would defend their product? yes but they were paid to keep their mouths shut so that people would either cancell their pre orders for the PS3 or get the Xbox 360 version instead. and it worked very well. its so stupid. and the fact they could so easily change the resolution to make it a more sharp and make the coulers and shine how it should be is rediculas. THEY DID IT ON PURPOSE PEOPLE, they got payed. its not good but hey what can we do. the
but what doesn't help is people saying how excellent a job they have done [which they have BUT done all this] and saying they dont no what people are on about saying its not as good as the Xbox, or saying its the TV, its still like this at 720p and you can make it better by changing your TV settings, but its still as i described, and its all on purpose. you do no they could so easily do a patch which will be nothing, like 30MB or less, nothing changing the game just its settings, and it will be so much better, but the fact is they arent going to because theyve obviously got a little secret contract with Micro$oft or it would have came out as it should be.
what i am saying is if eveyone just agreed and complained a bit and said yeh its a great game brilliant, but its out of resolution and is slighty jagged and soft [it really doesnt need to be its just a setting they set it as for the reasons i stated] or not as sharp as the other versions with different shady colouring and that it effects the game because after all you play a game with your eyes then they might haveto do the patch and it might not happen with mutli platform games in the future, this is why wev'e got a PS3 right? becuase it can display a better image is more powerfull and we perfer it. or you could all deny it and say its excellent then they have a reason to do this, and to multi platform games in the future, micro$oft can only controll so much with their money alsong as people just go along with it... look at COD, the same kind of things on the PS3. if everyone complains because afterall there is no need for this its stupid, then they will have no choice.
cool story m8, I didnt read it,... i just thought id bump your stupidity