"spears in the traditional sense"

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:47 am

According to Todd we wont have spears in a traditional sense. This sounds like he was trying to bypass the topic and not have to talk about something else.

Could he have been saying that we wont have "spears" as in a long stick with a sharp head at the tip but maybe have other type of pole arms? Such as glaives, halberds, poleaxes, yumonji, or naginata?

I dont know but its just something I've been running over and over in my head. I mean why would he choose those words? Todd is a very intelligent person and i think he was making a play on words.
User avatar
Khamaji Taylor
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:15 am

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:21 am

polearms or cavalry lance

in the trailer there is a image of a mounted attack using a lance
User avatar
Ricky Meehan
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 5:42 pm

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:51 am

most likly polearms, Beth is most likly trying to avoid stabby weapons like the plague, so they can as much as possible, reuse there sets of weapon swing animations.

that or throwing weapons are added and he is referring to the throw-able kind of spear.
User avatar
Nicola
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:57 am

Post » Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:30 pm

Maybe spears are a ranged weapon now. That would be awesome.
User avatar
Ruben Bernal
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:58 pm

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:12 am

A play on words, eh? Well, he said none in the traditional sense. Aha! Well, the traditional senses with which we experience spears most are sight and touch, with a little bit of sound. Maybe this is an olfactoral and gustatorial spear!
There. I've solved the puzzle!
User avatar
Jessica Raven
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:33 am

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:50 am

A play on words, eh? Well, he said none in the traditional sense. Aha! Well, the traditional senses with which we experience spears most are sight and touch, with a little bit of sound. Maybe this is an olfactoral and gustatorial spear!
There. I've solved the puzzle!

That, my friend, would be a fishy stick. A pointed one ^^,

edit (upon reaching PC): -- Having swords slice through opponents' flesh without leaving a mark looks acceptable -- we're used to it -- but imagine how a idiotic it would look to have spears just slide out sideways from an opponent after thrusting it into him. That's why I think they don't have spears now (it was okay pre-Oblivion, because animations were unconvincing anyway) -- because it's so hard to animate..... I bet it could be overcome, but they're apparently not working on it so.... well-well. :/
User avatar
GabiiE Liiziiouz
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 3:20 am

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:39 am

According to Todd we wont have spears in a traditional sense. This sounds like he was trying to bypass the topic and not have to talk about something else.

Could he have been saying that we wont have "spears" as in a long stick with a sharp head at the tip but maybe have other type of pole arms? Such as glaives, halberds, poleaxes, yumonji, or naginata?

I dont know but its just something I've been running over and over in my head. I mean why would he choose those words? Todd is a very intelligent person and i think he was making a play on words.

My take is that he meant there won't be a seperate skill for them. And they won't be a seperate weapon type, either - they'll be one of the available types of Polearms which is a perk branch under Two-Handed.
User avatar
Beat freak
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:04 am

Post » Fri Jul 09, 2010 9:55 pm

Ranged equals very good as long as you can melee withe the same spear. with balances of course.
User avatar
Stephanie Valentine
 
Posts: 3281
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:09 pm

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:48 am

the thing, I think, bethesda is trying to avoid is having too many different weapon types because of the combat overhaul
since they now have stylized and in depth play styles for each different weapon, it would be a waste of time and resources to include spears, throwing weapons, ect.
User avatar
Stat Wrecker
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 6:14 am

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:53 am

Do yourself a favor and don't try to pick every little word apart. You'll end up convincing yourself something is true when it's not.
User avatar
Charity Hughes
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:22 pm

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:24 am

most likly polearms, Beth is most likly trying to avoid stabby weapons like the plague, so they can as much as possible, reuse there sets of weapon swing animations.

that or throwing weapons are added and he is referring to the throw-able kind of spear.

Reuse of two handed weapon animation, so dagger again will have long sword animation I assume?
User avatar
CArla HOlbert
 
Posts: 3342
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:35 pm

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 1:55 am

Do yourself a favor and don't try to pick every little word apart. You'll end up convincing yourself something is true when it's not.

But still, if they weren't in, a solid "No" would have done fine. There's no reason to say otherwise. If there is nothing like spears, people will get the game, ask him "In what non-traditional sense are they in?" and he will (in this hypothetical world where Todd answers random questions about the game all the time) have to say "Uh... no sense. They're just not in." Does that sound logical to you? Does that sound like something he would do?

EDIT: Plus there's the concept art with the halberd, which while not definitive is certainly suggestive.
User avatar
Vivien
 
Posts: 3530
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:47 pm

Post » Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:40 pm

Since the general consensus on the forums now seems to be that spears are not in but other forms of polearms, like halberds and such, are. In that case, I'd take "No spears in the traditional sense" to mean we won't actually see spears, but we'll see weapons of a similar nature. I wouldn't be surprised if Bethesda felt that halberds and such had more room for different types of attacks than spears, but could still perform a similar role, so they decided they'd rather focus on them rather than spears.

Whatever the case, if spears WERE in. I'm sure Todd wouldn't say they weren't, so I think we can assume we won't see any weapon that's obviously, unmistakably a spear.
User avatar
Nicola
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:57 am

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:32 am

Reuse of two handed weapon animation, so dagger again will have long sword animation I assume?


maybe, maybe not we shall see, I′m sure we will see stabbing at least in the finisher/sneak attack animations.
User avatar
Jennifer May
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:51 pm

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:24 am

But still, if they weren't in, a solid "No" would have done fine. There's no reason to say otherwise. If there is nothing like spears, people will get the game, ask him "In what non-traditional sense are they in?" and he will (in this hypothetical world where Todd answers random questions about the game all the time) have to say "Uh... no sense. They're just not in." Does that sound logical to you? Does that sound like something he would do?

EDIT: Plus there's the concept art with the halberd, which while not definitive is certainly suggestive.

The reason Todd is wary about answering questions with definite yes/no answers is probably because of the Radiant AI debacle back from oblivion
Since there is still time left for development, there's still time to put spears in. He clearly doesn't want to promise anything that could change last second.
User avatar
Tanika O'Connell
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:34 am

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:31 am

The reason Todd is wary about answering questions with definite yes/no answers is probably because of the Radiant AI debacle back from oblivion
Since there is still time left for development, there's still time to put spears in. He clearly doesn't want to promise anything that could change last second.


if that were true then he would have said its something we're working on or playing with like he did with vampires. i believe he wants to have this as some sort of surprise.
User avatar
Taylor Bakos
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:05 am

Post » Fri Jul 09, 2010 9:26 pm

The reason Todd is wary about answering questions with definite yes/no answers is probably because of the Radiant AI debacle back from oblivion
Since there is still time left for development, there's still time to put spears in. He clearly doesn't want to promise anything that could change last second.

On several other items where this was the case, he simply said they were thinking of putting it in and trying to work it out, but they weren't sure and didn't want to promise anything. He could have said the same thing about spears, but he intentionally did not.
User avatar
Rhiannon Jones
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 3:18 pm

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:44 am

if that were true then he would have said its something we're working on or playing with like he did with vampires. i believe he wants to have this as some sort of surprise.


I think if that was the case he just go "that′s something we are going to think about" as other have said, his comment strongly points towards meaning no spears, but spear like weapons...aka polearms.
User avatar
Sandeep Khatkar
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:02 am

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:36 am

On several other items where this was the case, he simply said they were thinking of putting it in and trying to work it out, but they weren't sure and didn't want to promise anything. He could have said the same thing about spears, but he intentionally did not.

:thumbsup: my thoughts exactly
User avatar
Flutterby
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:28 am

Post » Fri Jul 09, 2010 9:59 pm

On several other items where this was the case, he simply said they were thinking of putting it in and trying to work it out, but they weren't sure and didn't want to promise anything. He could have said the same thing about spears, but he intentionally did not.

If he had said that the forum would go even more crazy claiming spears are simple... so that's why I'd avoid it...
User avatar
GRAEME
 
Posts: 3363
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 2:48 am

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:06 am

I think if that was the case he just go "that′s something we are going to think about" as other have said, his comment strongly points towards meaning no spears, but spear like weapons...aka polearms.



thats what my op stated.
User avatar
Nadia Nad
 
Posts: 3391
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 3:17 pm

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:28 am

throwing spears and halberds used like axes. maybe
User avatar
T. tacks Rims
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:35 am

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:43 am

thats what my op stated.


true, I was mostly pointing to "maybe he is saving it as a surprise" part and basicly saying...no, not with the comment he made. He won′t drop Spears are in.
User avatar
CSar L
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 9:36 pm

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:41 am

true, I was mostly pointing to "maybe he is saving it as a surprise" part and basicly saying...no, not with the comment he made. He won′t drop Spears are in.


lol i think we are on the same page :goodjob:
User avatar
Ells
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:03 pm

Post » Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:59 am

lol i think we are on the same page :goodjob:


wait...your also reading "the lusty Argonian maid"?
User avatar
Johanna Van Drunick
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:40 am

Next

Return to V - Skyrim