» Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:59 pm Dude they had quite a few realistic and valid reasons for not including split screen. I like split screen too, but I got over it quickly. Like everyone else, No-split screen is not a make or break thing, and if it is, you're pathetic (sorry). I have a younger brother who plays on my xbox occasionally, and that's one reason i wanted split screen, but we don't mind not playing together.
And as for the "activision" comment. Bethesda is the big-wig behind Splash Damage. Completely different company, if your gunna rage over something, at least know what ur talking about and do some research on your own first.
And as for the "activision" comment. Bethesda is the big-wig behind Splash Damage. Completely different company, if your gunna rage over something, at least know what ur talking about and do some research on your own first.
It's not make or break, it just seems like they have nothing to lose from including it - it's the players choice if they want to use it or not. If you had read my previous posts on this topic then you would know that i will still be buying this game (and enjoy it greatly).
Also i know that activision has nothing to do with BRINK, but they are notorious for putting their huge profits before the requests of their customers (for reference see MW2 post-launch)
I'm not raging, it's just a shame that what is going to be a great team-orientated game, couldn't include the option to play with your friends on the same console (a feature which has been pretty standard in many games, and clearly not impossible to implement).
