Spoiler: The year has been confirmed

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:18 am

Unless we get boy king garbage.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSukMQHQLIs

User avatar
Arnold Wet
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 10:32 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:49 am

That makes me happy. It gives things time to develop. I'd rather like to see the BoS operating in an expanded capacity, even though that's clearly going to grind some people's gears.

User avatar
Damned_Queen
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 5:18 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 7:43 pm

Way better than shoe-horning in the MWBOS IMO.

Regardless, I'll wait to judge the story until the game comes out and I've played through completely. Until then, at least Fallout 3 isn't concurrent, which would have just been awful. The timeline moving forward allows us to see some ramifications from Fallout 3. Which I'm happy about.

User avatar
Quick Draw
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 4:56 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 1:11 pm

i'm saying it was 6 years after NV,since NV took place in 2281.

User avatar
mimi_lys
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 11:17 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:34 am

In all honesty, that seems like something the BOS would do, given how Lyons is barely holding his BOS together.

User avatar
Kortknee Bell
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:05 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:17 pm

Well that makes more sense than the literal 200 years claims....on Arthur Maxson, as has been said in F3 he was shown to be in a special position in Lyons' BOS and was obviously being groomed for leadership, so its not exactly strange that at 20 considering the planned successor (Sarah Lyons) maybe dead that Maxson could be leading Lyons' BOS or indeed just a detachment of Lyons' BOS since its unlikely that Lyons' BOS has abandoned DC.

Also this could allow them to change Lyons' BOS back towards its roots if Bethesda wished to since under new management its easily possible that Maxson could unite Lyons' BOS and the Outcasts. It even gives us a plausible reason for Western BOS to begin emigrating east to join up with them since the knowledge that a Maxson was in charge of a BOS chapter, combined with their ultimately doomed position in the West gives us a reason why BOS as a whole could make a decision to move to a safer location.

User avatar
Amanda savory
 
Posts: 3332
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 10:37 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 12:07 pm

I am even more excited now. I'm glad it's set after the events of FO3 and not right after/concurrently.

Should be interesting. The hype is real!

User avatar
Steve Smith
 
Posts: 3540
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 10:47 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:49 pm

>People calling the sword in the stone Excalibur

Disgusting, whoever wrote that movie should be shot.

User avatar
Kristina Campbell
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:08 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 11:20 am

Well, we hope so. There definitely better be some damned lore from FO 3, or then I will be pissed. Of course, we will have those people chime in that "BGS never declares canon in TES!", and IF that turns out to be true.......ARgggggghhhhhh. If we find out about a Pat Unisix LW, I think I may blow a gasket.

And again, I don't think it would have been shoe-horning, and I will find a "boy king" story to be extremely lame, so I hope they do not go that route. Maxson better be a Knight, MAYBE a Paladin. If he is Head Paladin, or an Elder, again, I will blow a gasket. If Liberty Prime shows up to win us the final battle of the game again, I will, without a doubt, blow a gasket.

User avatar
james reed
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:18 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:52 am

That is like the best King Arthur movie I have ever seen, don't dis on Excalibur.

User avatar
Nicole Kraus
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:34 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 8:38 am

well but if TES is a reference, on Skyrim there was a book that vaguely explain what happen on the Oblivion crisis. And if i remember correctly some NPC speak about it, and Shegoroth (sorry is i spelll it wrong) quest on Skyrim is related to the DLC.

User avatar
Campbell
 
Posts: 3262
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:54 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:38 pm

I'd be standing by to blow that gasket, because I definitely think they were setting Arthur up to succeed in Fallout 3. Also....Prydwen.

If he is a oh-so--great-and-noble king, yeah that could get lame. But if he's sufficiently gray, or even morally corruptible (perhaps he's become devious and expansionist) then I wouldn't mind it. Or even if he's being used as a puppet for the real power behind the throne, with some interesting Byzantine-style politics in the background, than that could also be interesting depending on how its written.

Regardless we don't know. I wouldn't say that just because he's a King Arthur reference, that its automatically doomed to failure. It is possible to do the boy-king trope well.

User avatar
Lauren Dale
 
Posts: 3491
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 8:57 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:13 pm

@Pete Hines

210 years, not 200 years.
User avatar
KIng James
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:54 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:15 am

I'm not, but Excalibur is not the sword in the stone.

Excalibur was given to Arthur by the Lady of the Lake.

User avatar
Latisha Fry
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 6:42 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:09 pm

I see it two ways: The group removed old Lyons from power and put Arthur up because he represents the core essence of the group that Lyons more or less discarded, or Lyons passed leadership to Arthur and he does his own take on the 'white knight' BOS.

User avatar
Milagros Osorio
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 4:33 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:38 am

I would much rather prefer some originality, instead of going with what we all thought may be the case 7 years ago.

User avatar
Victoria Vasileva
 
Posts: 3340
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 5:42 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:35 pm

The lady of the lake is in the movie. Mayhaps you should just go watch it.

User avatar
Auguste Bartholdi
 
Posts: 3521
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:20 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:53 am

May Steel with be Arthur and his righteous crusade to save the people of Boston as he flies in on Prydwen.

R.I.P. Brotherhood of Steel, R.IP.

Lol
User avatar
Laura Shipley
 
Posts: 3564
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:47 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 8:54 pm

yeah Hollywood make sure to destroy Arthur tale. They have change it so much that ppl dont really know it anymore.

User avatar
sam westover
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:00 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:04 pm

I never said she wasn't. I said Arthur is supposed to get Excalibur from her, not from the stone.

User avatar
FirDaus LOVe farhana
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:42 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 8:34 am

You know nothing, Jon Snow. Maxson was as close to a Messiah, Prophet, Steel Jesus, as the Brotherhood has got. Anybody that's related the the original, is like the son of god himself to them. At twenty, and with the potential death of an Elder Lyons, I can safely say I expect they would make him Elder of the BoS over Sarah, because Sarah doesn't seem like she wants to rule. She just wants to fight. Arthur is a clever excuse to push herself aside.

And besides, Bethesda generally plans ahead. I can totally believe Arthur was being set up in three to become a central figure in the next title, or several titles over. I can imagine two scenarios:

1: Elder Lyosn is already dead, and Arthur has already taken over.

2: Elder Lyons will die sometime during the tale of Fallout 4.

OR heres a bonus idea: Arthur and Sarah create a power struggle.

This is, of course, if it really is Lyons, though will the recently revealed date, I'd say the Lyons theory had just gained a new leg.

OR HERES ONE MORE! Lyons end up fighting the Midwestern Chapter, thus why we 'blow up' an airship.

User avatar
Emma Louise Adams
 
Posts: 3527
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:15 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:13 am

You can side with different factions now, so we're not forced to side with the BoS at all. If they're all the way in Boston then they've definitely had dreams of empire, and there's going to be a lot more grey to them than previous appearances in a similar fashion to how the NCR were white in the old games but turned grey in the newer ones.

I can see the BoS's interest in Boston being the delicious technology inside The Institute, and their stance on android rights being more a tactic to destabilize the techno-lords of MiT and have a propaganda victory rather than a genuine concern for their rights.

User avatar
elliot mudd
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 8:56 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 7:44 am

yeah i think so too, after securing a foothold on Dc and a Base of Operation they probabbly go back to the old ways. Trying to get as much technology.

It will be fun if the CWBoS become over time, like the NCR and star taking more territory trow power, and on a future game we have a clash between the 3 factions NCR Legion and CWBoS

User avatar
Assumptah George
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:43 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 8:51 am

I dunno how other people's experiences were, but when I played Fallout 2 they didn't come off as a "white" faction at all.

User avatar
N3T4
 
Posts: 3428
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:36 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 12:24 pm

I don't want to derail the thread too much, but legends vary. Some call both swords Excalibur. The film is based on Le Morte d'Arthur by Thomas Mallory and he uses both legends.

"Malory records both versions of the legend in his Le Morte d'Arthur, naming both swords as Excalibur."

User avatar
Oscar Vazquez
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:08 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout 4