Guys, so you know, these maniacs have made lasers before. In the previous iterations, it still took several seconds to cut through electrical tape. Continuous exposure would do... about... the damage a cigarette burn would. I'm not sure how much these bastards have ramped it up, but you'd have to keep the beam focused for several seconds to do any lasting damage.... TO ANYWHERE BUT THE DAMN EYES.
Because of a 'standard' laser, I now need glasses. Guys, do not EVER ask yourselves what looking straight at a laser beam is like. Staring at the sun feels good in comparison.
The eyes are my biggest concern for this. Weve had about 80 attacks on law enforcement officers here lately with green lasers (eyes targeted). Not a single one has gotten permanent injuries so far, but its still a threat. I dont think I need to point out what would happen if you combined a teen whos not considering consequences, a much stronger laser and a heavy traffic road.
If the injuries it can cause were limited to the user only, then I wouldnt care at all. I miss natural selection sometimes. But as you might have figured out, the users wellbeing is not the greatest concern when speaking about this.
my thoughts exactly
this is proof that we're incredibly close to creating these
http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&source=imghp&gbv=2&aq=f&aqi=g10&oq=&gs_rfai=&q=Star%20Wars%20Blashter&tbs=isch:1
you watch, we're gonna be seein' that in the the next two decades
what the...?
since when did Han Solo's blaster resemble a German Mauser? O_o
Always...
The DL-44 Han Solo's using is based on the Mauser C96, just like the E11 Blaster Rifle is based on the Sten gun and some heavier stormtrooper blasters on the MG-42. Although theres still a big difference between the blasters in Star Wars and this laser, since blasters fire projectiles instead of a laser beam.
Reason for edit: I always seem to miss a typo or two before posting, even though I double check....