Swords are NOT heavy

Post » Wed Aug 11, 2010 4:06 am

Yay, now please close this thread. It has gone on way too long.
User avatar
Mariaa EM.
 
Posts: 3347
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:28 am

Post » Wed Aug 11, 2010 3:17 am

Swords were light, your wrong, do some research.


maybe you should. I already have, I just got rid of two swords. one manufactored, one hand crafted. don't base information about any replica you've held and say, jeez this isn't heavy. thats because it isn't a sword that would have been available in the medival ages. they used iron. unless your talking about short swords, which would be about 4-5 then yeah, but long swords were typically 10-14lbs. they did not have aluminum and modern steel working. they had forge hammared sharp rods of iron on a stick, to put it bluntly, and they don't compare to the typical sword available to the common sword collecter. oh by the way, the hand crafted sword I had, was made for my by my grandpa on my 15th birthday. (it wasn't free but I got a killer discount) hold a real sword made in the processes that was available in the 13 hundreds. its heavy.
User avatar
Romy Welsch
 
Posts: 3329
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 10:36 pm

Post » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:10 pm

I would like to remind people of the medieval period in Europe. Plate armor wasn't practical anymore, chain mail and leather were the driving force. Weapons didn't need to be heavy.

When your dealing with mediterranean weapon, they get heavy.
Chinese weapons are ridiculously light.
Japanese weapons are remarkable heavy.

Gual and Celtic weapons were heavy, because they were facing the heavily armored Romans. The Romans wield light weapons, because the were going against fur and leather.

It all depends on armor and the scarcity of material.
User avatar
Scared humanity
 
Posts: 3470
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:41 am

Post » Tue Aug 10, 2010 9:30 pm

I would like to remind people of the medieval period in Europe. Plate armor wasn't practical anymore, chain mail and leather were the driving force. Weapons didn't need to be heavy.

When your dealing with mediterranean weapon, they get heavy.
Chinese weapons are ridiculously light.
Japanese weapons are remarkable heavy.

Gual and Celtic weapons were heavy, because they were facing the heavily armored Romans. The Romans wield light weapons, because the were going against fur and leather.

It all depends on armor and the scarcity of material.

Wrong chainmail was early medieval times, sword and shield was common. Later plate become more common going from plate over chain to full plate suits, weapon changed to twohand sword and warhammers, even later most of the plate was dropped because you needed heavier amour to protect you from guns leaving only the cuirass, long thins swords like rapiers become common as you could hit outside the cuirass.
I'm talkng about rich people and knights here, early medival times swords was very expensive so most used axes and spears and no armor.
User avatar
electro_fantics
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:50 pm

Post » Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:39 pm

Doesn't change the fact some weapons are heavy others are light. At the end of the day that's all I'm saying.
User avatar
Astargoth Rockin' Design
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:51 pm

Post » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:23 pm

Wrong chainmail was early medieval times, sword and shield was common. Later plate become more common going from plate over chain to full plate suits, weapon changed to twohand sword and warhammers, even later most of the plate was dropped because you needed heavier amour to protect you from guns leaving only the cuirass, long thins swords like rapiers become common as you could hit outside the cuirass.
I'm talkng about rich people and knights here, early medival times swords was very expensive so most used axes and spears and no armor.


so every one used the same exact weapons against each other and the only variations happened as the time periods changed? and swords were not so expensive that only rich knights had them. true they had better quality weapons and armot but that doesn't apply to the whole conversation.
User avatar
April D. F
 
Posts: 3346
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:41 pm

Post » Wed Aug 11, 2010 6:05 am

maybe you should. I already have, I just got rid of two swords. one manufactored, one hand crafted. don't base information about any replica you've held and say, jeez this isn't heavy. thats because it isn't a sword that would have been available in the medival ages. they used iron. unless your talking about short swords, which would be about 4-5 then yeah, but long swords were typically 10-14lbs. they did not have aluminum and modern steel working. they had forge hammared sharp rods of iron on a stick, to put it bluntly, and they don't compare to the typical sword available to the common sword collecter. oh by the way, the hand crafted sword I had, was made for my by my grandpa on my 15th birthday. (it wasn't free but I got a killer discount) hold a real sword made in the processes that was available in the 13 hundreds. its heavy.

Check the sources, your wrong. There many links in this thread, they counter what you claim. I don't know what swords you have or had, its does not matter. There are numerous sources to counter your claim, real swords for example.

I took 14th century german long sword fighting for a bit, so beside all the source, my personal experience counters yours.
User avatar
Anna S
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 2:13 am

Post » Wed Aug 11, 2010 4:47 am

Zaria, plate mail fell out of fashion because of technology advances like CANNONS. Plate mail was never used for hundreds of years like people seem to think.
User avatar
Sherry Speakman
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:00 pm

Post » Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:55 pm

I get the feeling this thread won't be around for much longer...
User avatar
Wane Peters
 
Posts: 3359
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 9:34 pm

Post » Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:53 pm

Well it's past the post limit so probably not.
User avatar
Sunny Under
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 5:31 pm

Post » Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:03 am

sigh, why do people argue about this for over 200 posts, like the first five use examples to show they are right isn't that enough? swords and weapons in general were made to be usable, they wouldn't make a weapon that would get people killed using them
User avatar
Big mike
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:38 pm

Post » Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:49 pm

200+ posts; time to close this one ;)
User avatar
lilmissparty
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 7:51 pm

Previous

Return to V - Skyrim