Tamriel a Deadric Realm?

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:08 pm

In the main quest line of oblivion. when you get to the "paradise", Mankar Camoran tells you that Tamriel is just another Deadric realm.. But you never get the answar.. is that true? what do you think?

I think that it could be true (an easteregg from Bethesda) and that you actually fights for the wrong guys.
But on the other hand, I think that we would hear more about it in the game.
User avatar
Rodney C
 
Posts: 3520
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:54 am

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 1:38 pm

No tamriel is a realm of mundus. But as sheogorath always say: Tamriel is a place of boring things where people die!!
User avatar
Jonathan Egan
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:27 pm

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 6:02 pm

In the main quest line of oblivion. when you get to the "paradise", Mankar Camoran tells you that Tamriel is just another Deadric realm.. But you never get the answar.. is that true? what do you think?

I think that it could be true (an easteregg from Bethesda) and that you actually fights for the wrong guys.
But on the other hand, I think that we would hear more about it in the game.


I know the answer.

But, people on this sub forum don't.

Maybe you should ask somewhere else.

You know, where people know the answer.
User avatar
Conor Byrne
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 3:37 pm

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 6:20 pm

You know, where people know the answer.

The suspense is killing me

so here's the punch line

http://www.gamesas.com/bgsforums/index.php?showforum=16
User avatar
Cathrin Hummel
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 7:16 pm

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:12 pm

I know the answer.

But, people on this sub forum don't.

Maybe you should ask somewhere else.

You know, where people know the answer.

He's right.

I'd tell you but now I have to close ranks.
User avatar
Emma-Jane Merrin
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 1:52 am

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:30 pm

In the main quest line of oblivion. when you get to the "paradise", Mankar Camoran tells you that Tamriel is just another Deadric realm.. But you never get the answar.. is that true? what do you think?

In a sense, yes it is, but in my opinion there are enough fundamental differences that it shouldn't be called one...
User avatar
Soraya Davy
 
Posts: 3377
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:53 pm

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 1:41 pm

In a sense, yes it is, but in my opinion there are enough fundamental differences that it shouldn't be called one...



one COULD argue that mundus/Nirn was the *First* "Daedric Realm"--- With all the others being created from cosmic leftovers...... But, on the flipside, the other daedric realms are metaphysically the equivalent of oranges to apples, when compared to Mundus.
User avatar
Dean Brown
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:17 pm

Post » Tue Mar 09, 2010 1:17 am

It would be much easier to take anything in Mankar's little speech seriously if he had attributed even one of the assorted Daedric realms he named with its appropriate Prince.
User avatar
vicki kitterman
 
Posts: 3494
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:58 am

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 9:43 pm

one COULD argue that mundus/Nirn was the *First* "Daedric Realm"--- With all the others being created from cosmic leftovers...... But, on the flipside, the other daedric realms are metaphysically the equivalent of oranges to apples, when compared to Mundus.

Vehk's Teachings say the realms preceded the creation of Nirn.

Anyway, from the guy that wrote the dialogue:
Also in all fairness, there's enough evidence to support the Mankar's claims that I was happy that it went in. The idea really flips the idea of Tamriel on its head.

Imagine the Oblivion realm of Attribution's Share, for example, with eight powerful daedra (one of which is Boethiah) wielding divine power over their realm, and all their subjects bound to the whims of that power; now imagine it under an ur-theology and creation myth(s) as complicated as anything on Tamriel, where the myriad mortals of Nirn were, to the denizens of the Eight Divines of Attribution's Share, in fact, "daedra".

This realm would be surrounded by the Void, just like Tamriel, in turn surrounded by Aetherius, and who's to say that the big hole known as the Sun doesn't hit their shores, as well?

Lorkhan the Padomaic could be exactly what the Mankar says he is: the dead Lord of a lost daedric realm whose "gods" are powerful Liars.


And so, Lorkhan would have been usurped by these eight liars. And Dagon would be the force come to liberate Nirn.
User avatar
Jordan Fletcher
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:27 am

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:11 pm

one COULD argue that mundus/Nirn was the *First* "Daedric Realm"--- With all the others being created from cosmic leftovers...... But, on the flipside, the other daedric realms are metaphysically the equivalent of oranges to apples, when compared to Mundus.


It'd be a real short argument because there is plenty of suggestion that worlds were being made in one form of another before Mundus was made. Both the Yoku monomyth and the Anuad suggest Mundus was made of older worlds. But also from 'Heart of the World' as the revolutionary part of Lorkhan's plan seems to have been the worlds abbility to allow for the existence of aspects of aspects. Hence the suggestion from 'Shezarrs Song' that the Daedra made worlds that imitated this principle afterwards.

The OP's qeustion can in essence be answered by looking up at the sky and noting that it is Oblivion that we're looking at.
User avatar
Kathryn Medows
 
Posts: 3547
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 12:10 pm

Post » Tue Mar 09, 2010 1:27 am

@Prowler: Can't you still see a night sky in Mehrunes' pocket-realms or in the Shivering Isles?
User avatar
Paula Ramos
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:43 am

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:20 pm

@Prowler: Can't you still see a night sky in Mehrunes' pocket-realms or in the Shivering Isles?

It's probably the same basic sky texture, as far as stars go at least.
User avatar
Catherine N
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:58 pm

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:39 pm

It's a pretty good question; after all, the mortal Grummites were said to be the original inhabitants of the Shivering Isles. But if it was a Daedric realm, then why are there no Daedra for which Mundus is their home realm? Or do they merely reside in Akavir? So many questions unanswered...
User avatar
Sarah Edmunds
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 8:03 pm

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 4:54 pm

It's a pretty good question; after all, the mortal Grummites were said to be the original inhabitants of the Shivering Isles. But if it was a Daedric realm, then why are there no Daedra for which Mundus is their home realm? Or do they merely reside in Akavir? So many questions unanswered...

Er. That's us, dude.
User avatar
Flutterby
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:28 am

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:53 pm

But if it was a Daedric realm, then why are there no Daedra for which Mundus is their home realm?

Those would be men and mer...
User avatar
Mark
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 11:59 am

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:26 pm

Er. That's us, dude.

But why do men and mer not retain their memories of past lives when they reincarnate?
User avatar
megan gleeson
 
Posts: 3493
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:01 pm

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:00 pm

But why do men and mer not retain their memories of past lives when they reincarnate?

Because as I said, Nirn and the Daedric realms are fundamentally different... or maybe you could somehow attribute it to this realm's Prince being dead (some cool memory-tied-to-princes-oversoul-and-since-Lorkhan-is-dead-ppl-lose-memory type thingy)...
User avatar
Sylvia Luciani
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:31 am

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:24 pm

Because as I said, Nirn and the Daedric realms are fundamentally different... or maybe you could somehow attribute it to this realm's Prince being dead (some cool memory-tied-to-princes-oversoul-and-since-Lorkhan-is-dead-ppl-lose-memory type thingy)...

But Daedra cannot die. Sure, his heart survived, but when daedra are banished, their hearts remain in their lifeless bodies.
User avatar
Justin Hankins
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 12:36 pm

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 1:49 pm

But Daedra cannot die. Sure, his heart survived, but when daedra are banished, their hearts remain in their lifeless bodies.


They can die alright. I wouldn't know how I'd go about killing or soul trapping them if they couldn't. :)

But why do men and mer not retain their memories of past lives when they reincarnate?


The biggest difference between mortals and Daedra is the way they are immortal. Daedra once they've died their souls simply have to wait or find something akin to a wellspring. Mortals on the other hand live on through their children. Babies can't remember and so they forget.

The spirits that were left pleaded with Tall Papa to take them back. But grim Ruptga would not, and he told the spirits that they must learn new ways to follow the stars to the Far Shores now. If they could not, then they must live on through their children, which was not the same as before. - The world skin


Some had to marry and make children just to last. Each generation was weaker than the last, and soon there were Aldmer. - Heart of the World

User avatar
Natasha Callaghan
 
Posts: 3523
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 7:44 pm

Post » Tue Mar 09, 2010 2:01 am

NO

Daedric realms are the physical re-constructions of Daedra.

Mundus is something else... It was made by Aedra, and is made of them and their energies.

Mancar uses it to justify invading, although the Daedric Prince of destruction doesn't really care about reasons, he destroys crap that's it.

They can die alright. I wouldn't know how I'd go about killing or soul trapping them if they couldn't.


Soultraping only traps their soul until you use it (Or you could trap them in weapons/armor) but killing them sends them back to their super-natural spawn point in Oblivion... Unless you kill them in Oblivion, then there dead.
User avatar
Emma
 
Posts: 3287
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:51 am

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 4:49 pm

No, their souls get sent into the waters of oblivion, where they shall remain formless, but conscious and scared, until they go back to the 'revive' point provided by their master. Daedra are not gone forever if killed in oblivion, unless you found a way to completely sever them from complete all existence, making never exist in the beginning.
User avatar
Maria Garcia
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 6:59 am

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:04 pm

But Daedra cannot die. Sure, his heart survived, but when daedra are banished, their hearts remain in their lifeless bodies.

I'm really not sure which way you're arguing here or what you're point is (Note: That's not meant to be condescending, I'm just really don't know what you're getting at)...
The biggest difference between mortals and Daedra is the way they are immortal.

The problem with this is that it surmounts to saying "They're immortal, just in different ways", and then the description of how humans are immortal containing the definition of what makes them mortal. You can anolyze the mortal condition on Nirn and say "well, they're immortal in this way", but in the end 'that way' doesn't make them any less of a mortal...
User avatar
lillian luna
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 9:43 pm

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:53 pm

Mundus is something else... It was made by Aedra, and is made of them and their energies.


The only real difference between the Aedra and the Daedra is that the Aedra made Mundus and the Daedra didn't. Well that and the Aedra seem to be more alligned to Anu. Both are the et'Ada or Original Spirits.


The problem with this is that it surmounts to saying "They're immortal, just in different ways", and then the description of how humans are immortal containing the definition of what makes them mortal. You can anolyze the mortal condition on Nirn and say "well, they're immortal in this way", but in the end 'that way' doesn't make them any less of a mortal...


The point was sorta that mortality on Nirn isn't quite the same as mortality here on Earth. At least if you don't take reincarnation into account in which case both mortals and Daedra are mortal, except that the Daedra know everything about their past live.
User avatar
Setal Vara
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:24 pm

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:05 pm

The only real difference between the Aedra and the Daedra is that the Aedra made Mundus and the Daedra didn't. Well that and the Aedra seem to be more alligned to Anu. Both are the et'Ada or Original Spirits.
The point was sorta that mortality on Nirn isn't quite the same as mortality here on Earth. At least if you don't take reincarnation into account in which case both mortals and Daedra are mortal, except that the Daedra know everything about their past live.


I thought the Daedra are rebel angels, ultimate selfishness and too proud to help create Nirn. Don't mortals differ from that?
User avatar
Darren
 
Posts: 3354
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 2:33 pm

Post » Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:07 pm

Ah, the power of cheese CHIM.
User avatar
Taylor Thompson
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:19 am

Next

Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion