http://www.gamesas.com/topic/1524926-tes-vi-location-and-setting-speculation-24/
Since everyone seems pretty opposed to a game set in two provinces (for reasons I totally understand), what about a game based not in a whole province, but instead in a region? As far as I know (which is not very far) Daggerfall was set in areas of High Rock, Hammerfell and by extension Orsinium. What about breaking up the "one whole province" formula and making the setting, for example, the disputed lands around Leyawiin. The game could take us to eastern Elsweyr, southern Cyrodil and western Argonia. Cultural variation and political factions could be a heavy focus of the story. Maybe the player gets to decide to fight for one of three factions fighting over the lands or something, ultimately altering the map of Tamriel (or maintaining the status quo of course if you choose).
I'd love a more political game like this. Sure, it creates problems with canon, but Skyrim already gave us a choice of the future of Skyrim. There are ways around it.
A fact I'm reminded of all too often as a console gamer
but yeah, seems those are the main arguments against a double province game. Like I said it makes total sense, especially as most people on here (myself included) want to see the deep lore and culture of the games done the justice it deserves.
Yes, I've brought that up already. My suggestion was the City Isle in Cyrodiil in an absolutely huge version and with an Imperial City that deserves that name.
"Ways around it" are always awkward. It's very simple really. Bethesda defines the lore. Not the player and not the forums, but only Bethesda with in game stuff. I'm all for politically far reaching decision possibilities for the player, which would necessarily include a canonical version from Bethesda for later games.
Provinces is not just one terrain, Oblivion went from Subtropical to cold.
Nothern Vallenwood in ESO is on the edge from forrests and Bosmers over to savanna and Khajiit
The leveling zones in ESO is perhaps 1/4 of an province and tend to be more uniform.
I'd be more interested in the cultural variation than the different landscapes though. This could also tackle the problem of setting a game in a beast province-they say that won't sell (I'm really not sure about that argument anyway), assuming that's true, setting part of a game in beast province(s) would give some loyal fans something they've been asking for for an age, it could capitalise on the alien feel of, say, Argonia, by contrasting it with culture in southern Cyrodil. At the same time, the entire game doesn't have to take place there, avoiding the supposed risk of alienating more casual players.
I think after the success of Skyrim, people will buy the game in droves no matter where it is set at.
While it's true that you sacrifice depth for a wider focus, it's not a one or the other type of situation. A game like that could still have cultural depth, it might just focus more on interaction between cultures. I would argue that shows a type of depth in itself if it's done right.
As for the idea mentioned about a game set on Rumare, that sounds awesome. Believe me, I'm all for scaling down the games to show a more detailed area, I'm just also far it taking place in a region which crosses one or maybe two borders.
EDIT: What the hell have I done to my markup?