Tes4Edit Cleaning Guide on CS Wiki

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 11:26 pm

Brumbek and all,
I have noted that the "HeartOftheDead.esp" is on both the list of Mods Needing Cleaning, as well as on the list of Mods Already Clean. Does anybody know which is correct?

Wouldn't it be helpful if the lists not only listed the .esp names but also the version numbers (if available), as shown in the WB List Modlist function ?


[haegintcleaning]
User avatar
Adriana Lenzo
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 1:32 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:15 am

Brumbek and all,
I have noted that the "HeartOftheDead.esp" is on both the list of Mods Needing Cleaning, as well as on the list of Mods Already Clean. Does anybody know which is correct?

Wouldn't it be helpful if the lists not only listed the .esp names but also the version numbers (if available), as shown in the WB List Modlist function ?

It's probably because HoD updates so quickly. I certainly haven't tried to clean the latest one, v6 or whatever. You can just try to run the clean functions and see what turns up. If anything does turn up on the latest plugin, check to see what those records are. They might need to be left in there.


Update: I just checked. It's clean. You can PM whoever is managing the list on that one. I don't know what the earliest clean version was, but at least v6 is.
User avatar
Melissa De Thomasis
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:52 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 12:09 pm

Update: I just checked. [HoD] It's clean. You can PM whoever is managing the list on that one. I don't know what the earliest clean version was, but at least v6 is.

Great, thanks Tomlong!
Actually if you one has an account with TES CS, one can edit the list directly (Wiki principle). I'll take it off the "to clean" list and insert the version no. in the "cleaned" list.

http://cs.elderscrolls.com/constwiki/index.php/TES4Edit_Cleaning_Guide#List_of_Mods_Already_Clean
User avatar
Katy Hogben
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:20 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 5:30 am

I've been reading the Cleaning Guide now, and I would like to repost one particularly noteworthy section:

A Community-Wide Effort
ElminsterEU rightly points out that cleaning mods should be a community-wide effort. The following is adapted from his statement on the subject:

It's NOT a good idea for everyone to just go ahead and clean their full load order and then forget about it.

The problem is twofold. First, to properly clean mods usually requires an understanding of the intent of the mod author. There might be implicit dependencies on other mods which are not part of the master list. Second, and following from the first, depending on how the cleaning was done, people end up with slightly different versions of these modules, which is going to make support in case of problems a nightmare for the mod author.

Also, this would (and currently does) lead to a huge waste of time as different people are cleaning the same mods over and over.

What is needed is more awareness of the issues.

For mod authors:
1.Clean your mods properly. All of them. You are the one who really knows the intention of your mod. Closely review all changes to make sure they preserve the intent of your mod.
2.Cleaning mods is NOT just limited to running the automated functions and be done with it. Manually review every override record your module(s) contain to make sure that that's really what you intended to do.
3.List in your documentation that you HAVE cleaned your mods and which version of TES4Edit you used for it. If there were any indirect dependencies that you had to observe while doing the cleaning, specifically list them and the rational for them.

For mod users:
1.Check your mods that do not specifically mention being properly cleaned (by basically doing a dry run of the cleaning process).
2.If any of your mods are dirty, inform the author. The mod authors are the ones that really understand the intention of their mods. They are the ones that are in the best position to properly clean them. And if they only publish properly cleaned mods, the whole community benefits from it.
3.If a mod has been deserted by its author or the author is unwilling to fix his mess, just leave a short note on the comments and/or in the RELz thread to save other mod users from wasting their time. Remember: stay civil; flaming doesn't help anyone.
Mod quality is a community-wide problem that needs to be properly addressed on a community level. And from the ground up, starting with the mod authors. Everyone doctoring around on the symptoms (by cleaning the mods in their own load order) is just wasting a huge amount of time and effort and actually makes support more difficult because different people will have different versions of the same mod.

This is primarily an awareness problem. Only in very rare cases are dirty mods a skill problem. And even more rarely an attitude problem.

A concentrated community-wide effort is required to raise awareness of these issues, and to make it clear that as a matter of community standards, it's not ok to release sub-quality modules which cluster bomb over everything else.

User avatar
Harinder Ghag
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:26 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:42 am

Great, thanks Tomlong!
Actually if you one has an account with TES CS, one can edit the list directly (Wiki principle). I'll take it off the "to clean" list and insert the version no. in the "cleaned" list.

http://cs.elderscrolls.com/constwiki/index.php/TES4Edit_Cleaning_Guide#List_of_Mods_Already_Clean

Hmmm... Maybe I should sign up. For the time being, I can post my updates here for you, but lately I have been sticking to that list. Until I finalize my main LO later this week, I won't be updating my cleaned plugins project in BAIN though.

Move Supreme Magicka off of the list too, or at least put v0.90b6 + on the clean list too, please.


Happy gaming!
- Tomlong75210


Edit: It may be better to put Supreme Magicka on the don't clean list too.

Edit: Artefacts of the Ancestors needs much cleaning, and it needs to have a duplicate deleted record snipped out with a tool such as TESSnip as well.
User avatar
megan gleeson
 
Posts: 3493
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:01 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:30 am

OK, wanted to see if Tarnesia is really as dirty as the guide says :)

Tesnexus download: http://www.tesnexus.com/downloads/file.php?id=6372

Cleaning results:
  • [Removing "Identical to Master" records done] Processed Records: 6304 Removed Records: 4440 Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • [Undeleting and Disabling References done] Processed Records: 1864 Undeleted Records: 1 Elapsed Time: 00:00

I guess it is... and now one should still clean the "wild edits"... :cold:
User avatar
Chelsea Head
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 6:38 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 10:36 am

OK, wanted to see if Tarnesia is really as dirty as the guide says :)

Tesnexus download: http://www.tesnexus.com/downloads/file.php?id=6372

Cleaning results:
  • [Removing "Identical to Master" records done] Processed Records: 6304 Removed Records: 4440 Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • [Undeleting and Disabling References done] Processed Records: 1864 Undeleted Records: 1 Elapsed Time: 00:00

I guess it is... and now one should still clean the "wild edits"... :cold:

Ha-hah, yeah, I'm not looking forward to doing the final cleaning job on my new ~230 active plugins load order.
User avatar
Elle H
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 3:15 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:26 am

Move Supreme Magicka off of the list too, or at least put v0.90b6 + on the clean list too, please.

Added, thanks :) What about the Beta 7 dated 09 Jan 2011 ?


Edit: It may be better to put Supreme Magicka on the don't clean list too.

Done and added a small comment. I hope it makes sense.


Edit: Artefacts of the Ancestors needs much cleaning, and it needs to have a duplicate deleted record snipped out with a tool such as TESSnip as well.

There are a couple of respective comments already in the "to clean" list, reluctant to touch that.

Edit: I have moved Tarnesia to my "Maybe do later" folder... :laugh:
User avatar
Dark Mogul
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:51 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:42 am

As one of the chief editors of the Wiki, I encourage everyone to sign up. Tommy_H, since I don't have any real knowledge of load ordering or cleaning (or the specific mods), I'm likely to rely on you as a name I recognize to OK edits to the list, though.
User avatar
Allison Sizemore
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:09 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 2:48 am

Added, thanks :) What about the Beta 7 dated 09 Jan 2011 ?



Done and added a small comment. I hope it makes sense.



There are a couple of respective comments already in the "to clean" list, reluctant to touch that.

Edit: I have moved Tarnesia to my "Maybe do later" folder... :laugh:

That looks fine. Could you move these too? They have been updated and included in 0.90b6.

SM_COBL.esp
SM_DeadlyReflex.esp
SM_ShiveringIsles.esp


Edit: I forgot about the VHB update. I think Arthmoor's update is version 1.5 or 1.5.1. It's definitely clean. V12 is definitely not, so you can leave that one up there. Just keep the version numbers to distinguish them.
User avatar
Jade MacSpade
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:53 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:28 am

Could you move these too? They have been updated and included in 0.90b6.
SM_COBL.esp
SM_DeadlyReflex.esp
SM_ShiveringIsles.esp

Added, thanks.
How can PacificMorrowind keep doing this day after day after day...??? :teehee:
User avatar
Anne marie
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 1:05 pm

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:26 pm

As one of the chief editors of the Wiki, I encourage everyone to sign up. Tommy_H, since I don't have any real knowledge of load ordering or cleaning (or the specific mods), I'm likely to rely on you as a name I recognize to OK edits to the list, though.

I'll try to remember to do that when I get home from work, ha-ha.

Added, thanks.
How can PacificMorrowind keep doing this day after day after day...??? :teehee:

I was actually thinking that there might as well be a line in the masterlist to say whether or not a plugin is clean, ha-ha.

Once I get home, I'll do a quick look over my cleaned plugins folder and post my findings, at least for any big mods I don't see on the list.


Thanks again!
- Tomlong75210
User avatar
Rachael Williams
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:43 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:45 am

As one of the chief editors of the Wiki, I encourage everyone to sign up. Tommy_H, since I don't have any real knowledge of load ordering or cleaning (or the specific mods), I'm likely to rely on you as a name I recognize to OK edits to the list, though.

Well, I'm not Mr KnowItAll myself about cleaning mods and stuff. However, I used Tes4Edits successfully for some private editing before. But I am conscious of my shortcomings in this field, so I'm quite cautious. I may also say that by now I do understand a thing or two about modding my game as a mod user. I mean I was able to install FCOM successfully on the first try. How much does that qualify? :D

Enough joking.

The reason why I thought to just go ahead with the updates Tomlong has been proposing is simply that I understand she is a true expert when it comes to modding Oblivion. I would not have put "just anybody's" proposals up there without questioning as I am conscient that we do not want to change the lists back and forth and back and forth with dubious information or error corrections and so on. I can only speak for myself when I say I promise to be diligent and transparent with any edits I will be making.

I think those Cleaning Guide lists should be much more comprehensive and updated. Actually up-to-date is probably more important than comprehensive. I fully understand this is much more easily said than done. What I was thinking is, now that I have a fairly long modlist myself (about 100 mods) I have a fair amount of cleaning to do. I thought I could put my progress and findings in this thread, hopefully encouraging others to post their cleaning results as well. And hopefully encourage people to post updates to the CS Wiki lists as appropriate.

At the same time, by posting findings here in the forums the gate keepers of the CS Wiki could verify / check whether indeed there were issues found with any particular mod, and any edits to the lists were not for nothing. I think Elminster's plea for a community effort should be taken seriously in the sense that gamers who do clean their mods should put up their findings in public to make others aware of it.

DragoonWraith, please let me know if I can be of any further help or should change my thinking / approach. Basically I'm ready to do my part in order to make those lists as useful as possible. But I cannot do it on my own. Everybody so inclined can just contribute and provide a tangible benefit to the entire OB community. Many thanks!
User avatar
Austin England
 
Posts: 3528
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:16 pm

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 11:50 pm

PacificMorrowind is really an android we all built so we could have more time for other stuff. :P

Elminster's advice about contacting mod authors about CS dirt is good in theory, but in practice it usually leads to frustration as very few of the authors it applies to are even still around anymore.

What's even more curious is that back in the day when I was paying attention to Morrowind modding, the need to clean things was well known and very much expected. That never seemed to make the jump to Oblivion and even now it's quite difficult to get people to realize it's necessary.
User avatar
Georgia Fullalove
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 11:48 pm

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 11:43 pm

The scary bit for me is that I have only added a handful of item mods at this point. Those little mods can have all sorts of random edits in them. I probably have about 80 that I plan to add to my LO (after merging them) and since I haven't kept a record (with version numbers) about which I have cleaned in the past, I'll be using TES4Edit to go over each one... In that respect, this does seem like a masterlist-scale project.
User avatar
Tanya Parra
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 5:15 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:49 am

I was actually thinking that there might as well be a line in the masterlist to say whether or not a plugin is clean, ha-ha.

Hmmmmm.... that sounds like an intriguing idea.... let Boss put a simple comment like "needs cleaning" or "needs no cleaning". But then again I wonder how much more work they can handle at all... maybe contact him in private and ask how he sees it? Obviously the cleaning info must come from the community just like now with all the unknown mod names.

One thing is certain: Since Boss is now so much ingrained in us and a part of our "Oblivion life", the whole mod cleanup complex would gain so much more exposure and traction for the benefit of all, I'm sure....
User avatar
Stefanny Cardona
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:08 pm

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 11:32 pm

Hmmmmm.... that sounds like an intriguing idea.... let Boss put a simple comment like "needs cleaning" or "needs no cleaning". But then again I wonder how much more work they can handle at all... maybe contact him in private and ask how he sees it? Obviously the cleaning info must come from the community just like now with all the unknown mod names.

One thing is certain: Since Boss is now so much ingrained in us and a part of our "Oblivion life", the whole mod cleanup complex would gain so much more exposure and traction for the benefit of all, I'm sure....

Agreed. People started to become more conscious of Bash tags after they were integrated into BOSS.
User avatar
luke trodden
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 12:48 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 2:35 am

BOSS already has a few things in it that have large amounts of dirty edits, it certainly can't hurt to throw in more as they're found. I personally don't want to load it up with stuff that only has a few because you'd have to list practically every mod in existence. The big offenders though, that's different. Stuff like Artefacts of the Ancestors, Tarnesia, or He who shall not be named's mods for instance.
User avatar
Tiffany Carter
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 4:05 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 7:02 am

PacificMorrowind is really an android we all built so we could have more time for other stuff. :P

I need a PacificMorrowind myself right NOW!!! :laugh:


Elminster's advice about contacting mod authors about CS dirt is good in theory, but in practice it usually leads to frustration as very few of the authors it applies to are even still around anymore.

You have a good point here. I think we can pretty much forget about modders revisiting their work, in the majority of cases. But the awareness thing amonst ourselves is also valuable and should not be overlooked.

Maybe people are bypassing cleaning (myself included) because the games keeps working stable or stable enough most of the times, if you apply all the other good practices like pyffi, Boss, WB and so on bla-bla. Maybe the situation was different with Morrowind? I just don't know because I have never played Morrowind . OK, now I've said it. :blush: (Didn't play it for no real reason really, just was never aware of it. Only came to TES via Oblivion, and even that only in late 2007. Sorry for that...)
User avatar
Danger Mouse
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:55 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 10:17 am

I personally don't want to load it up with stuff that only has a few because you'd have to list practically every mod in existence.

In theory yes, I agree. However the avalanche of cleaning info the Boss team would get bombarded with may be mitigated by the fact that before sending out any info, a gamer would actually sit down with a mod deliberately for some time, apply the cleanup and so on, whereas practically no effort is required other than skimming the newest files list on TESN in order to bombard the Boss team with another 20 unknown mod names... or so it seems to me sometimes when I read up on the Boss thread... :rolleyes:
User avatar
Niisha
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 2:54 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 1:23 am

Thanks to everybody here who's updated the guide. I think we at least have the major problem mods identified.
User avatar
Kelvin Diaz
 
Posts: 3214
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 5:16 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:04 am

Cleanup of Fantasy Tent (by Bond), no version number

http://www.tesnexus.com/downloads/file.php?id=7840

This is a funny little mod. It puts a fancy tent, poetically named Arabian Knight Fantasy Tent into the IC Waterfront. It serves as a player home. If my modding skills were better I would make an update or a redecoration of it because I really like it. The original .esp has some yellow WTF issues related to some clutter vases, and their placement was not optimal. I corrected these manually for myself, again because I like the unique design and looks. So when installing this yourself, be aware of these bugs. Anyway, the Tes4Edit run came up with the following

Cleaning issues:
  • [Removing "Identical to Master" records done] Processed Records: 262 Removed Records: 15 Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • [Undeleting and Disabling References done] Processed Records: 247 Undeleted Records: 0 Elapsed Time: 00:00

I did not investigate at this time if further manual cleaning was required.
User avatar
Jordyn Youngman
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:54 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:45 am

Cleanup of See You Sleep, version 1.5.1

http://www.tesnexus.com/downloads/file.php?id=16005

Cleaning issues:
  • [Removing "Identical to Master" records done] Processed Records: 192 Removed Records: 7 Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • [Undeleting and Disabling References done] Processed Records: 185 Undeleted Records: 0 Elapsed Time: 00:00

I did not investigate at this time if any further manual cleaning was required.
User avatar
Zoe Ratcliffe
 
Posts: 3370
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 12:45 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 12:48 am

Just in case it isn't clear, because I've seen it reported wrong before, but if you see:

Undeleted Records: 0

that's a good thing. The "processed records" part can be misleading.

The count on dirty records can be somewhat exaggerated too since it counts everything in the record chain as an individual record.
User avatar
Code Affinity
 
Posts: 3325
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 11:11 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 12:38 am

Cleanup of Bob's Armory Oblivion version 1.1

Cleaning issues:

  • [Removing "Identical to Master" records done] Processed Records: 225 Removed Records: 6 Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • [Undeleting and Disabling References done] Processed Records: 219 Undeleted Records: 0 Elapsed Time: 00:00

I did not investigate at this time if any further manual cleaning was required.
User avatar
A Boy called Marilyn
 
Posts: 3391
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 7:17 am

Next

Return to IV - Oblivion