I didn't mean literally the same dungeons. I meant there are a handful of dungeon themes and after the main quest is finished, the rest of game consists of retrieving item X from these dungeons or killing X in a dungeon, etc. So, yes, you can play Skyrim for a long time, but is it time well spent? Or is it just fluff? All of the story, dialogue, etc., in Dragon Age is good quality, but the con is players are more limited. To use another example, Daggerfall was an enormous game, with more dungeons than skyrim, morrowind, and oblivion, but the dungeons were all basically the same thing. So the point is you can't just compare gameplay hours with gameplay hours. You also need to factor in the quality of the gameplay as well. 10 hours of tetris isn't the same thing as 10 hours of FF7.
I understand what you are saying. The characters in Dragons Age were very well fleshed out and the dialogue was top notch. I would expect nothing less from Bioware. But the game was on rails. No real freedom. The same setting were visited over and over, even more so in DA2.
Im Skyrim, I reall do not have an issue with the dialogue. I think most of it is very well done. Voice acting is good. Even on the side quests, such as the forsworn conspiracy. For sych as large game like this, they cannot make ever NPC dialogue top notch and meaningful.
My point was that I believe that there was more of an effort put into making this game (thus more expense), so when someone said something like were not getting our sixty dollars worth, Im just asking people to consider the effort put into make this huge game as compared to to other games which are shorter.
Lets not forget the music and sounds in the game, which are very well done and add alot of value to the overall experience.