Some people don't understand why this game is sub-par because they either don't have the technical know how of how games are made, or don't have enough experience PC gaming.
By pure technical standards, the game simply isn't an achievement. It's a very generic shooter.
So if folks don't agree with you, they are ignorant. Now that is an stupendously ignorant assertion.
I don't know how and when did Crysis become the wonder that everyone claim it to be. Probably I need to play the modded version to see this wonder but, that wouldn't make sense for its giving credit to Crytek for something they didn't do.
No it isn't. He said the game doesn't achieve anything by present standards. He said it's a very generic shooter. He didn't say you are ignorant if you like it as it is. But you are, if you think your opinion measures the standards, rather than other games that have actually set the standards he is speaking of.
Crysis has a unique, working gameplay experience and technical excellence. If you can't see that then fine, but it did set standards back then.
Edit: Well I agree C2 doesn't achieve much, but not being sub-par as in below average game. SP maybe, MP no.