The actual gameplay was much better, the powers and guns were more distinct and the character progression system much easier to grasp. Overly simple, perhaps, but the ME2 approach is more elegant. Story is crap, but that's what i've come to expect from games, and no, i don't see what's so special about ME1 story either, so maybe i'm just stupid :shrug: However as a game it's an improvement.
As for me, Steam UI update almost was the epic fail of all times due to preventing me from using (it happened this year, right? :unsure:), but as i managed to kick it into working order, i have to agree with Ubisoft's DRM. I did buy Assassin's Creed 2, AS A USED COPY FOR MY PS3!
As for me, Steam UI update almost was the epic fail of all times due to preventing me from using (it happened this year, right? :unsure:), but as i managed to kick it into working order, i have to agree with Ubisoft's DRM. I did buy Assassin's Creed 2, AS A USED COPY FOR MY PS3!
Yet the gameplay wasn't better, it was pop up, shoot, pop up etc. All the strategy was taken out by including regenerative health, faster cool-downs that cut off other powers, etc. The rock-paper-scissors armor/shield/barrier thing was boring and made combat even duller. While the shooter fan may say that this makes it "more fun" and "less dull than an RPG", the RPG fan will say the opposite. I was thoroughly bored by ME2. The the feeling of accomplishment from unlocking a new power or weapon for another play-through is just given to you in 2. If Bioware wanted to make a shooter they should have, just leave ME alone. Mass Effect got Xenosaga-ed.