Reply #200

#202 get

IM 202!!!!!

CONGRAGULATIONS!!! :clap:
you get a cookie :cookie:

THANKS!
you get a froggy :frog:

#206

nope you were 205 that number to the side means nothing. NOTHING!!!

:rofl:

Thanks for the ROFL
you get a turtle :turtle:

After reading through the majority of this thread. I can see that some people forgot about the fact that these ideas are supposed to be ones that never would make it.

The people who did catch it have said some hilarious stuff though.

Immersion is not the feeling that you are in the world, books can draw you in as can films. Are books only written in first person immerse would films be better if the camera only filmed from the main characters point of view?

First person views have been with us from 1980, there where plenty of first person games, where do people get the idea that FO1 was designed the way it was due to technology, blatantly false, it was made that way by design not because of limitation. I doubt anybody wants the full view of fallout back but more pulled out, rotatable view? yes please, the game would allow me to be immersed in my character by showing me what he/she is up too at any point, I find first person removes immersion in the character, as I don't want to see everything from their perspective. The character is not me.

Once we return to a decent view then we can return to a decent combat system,that is fully implemented turn based, nothing wrong with real time but FO should be turn based

Stay away from the FO forums return and see the same arguments people have been using for the last 4 years, even though a quick google search would show it to be false

BGSF, BGSF never changes

CATS!! CATS!! CATS RULEZ!!

six!!! JK lol. FLYING DOGS!!!! traveling in the wastes and OMFG its a flying doG!!! :ahhh:

Making people explode with elbow-drops

This

Post limit