» Tue May 25, 2010 4:46 pm
I'll copy/paste my argument from a thread about the Enclave's plan that was posted in the Fallout Series forum.
A quote from your conversation with Eden:
LW: Won't this kill pretty much everyone in the Wasteland?
Eden: Anyone or anything that has been exposed to the effects of mutation. You'll likely be immune, due to your upbringing in the vault...He goes to say that this will also kill everyone you became 'sympathetic' to in your travels.
Now note, not harmful mutations, mutations. Because they have lived two centuries in a radiation-basked desert, this is, essentially, all human beings who were born outside of a vault (including the Lone Wanderer) or the Enclave. In fact, this could INCLUDE some members of the Enclave if they weren't all born under the right conditions. 'Mutations' like a sixth toe are common, but not deadly, annomolies. This leaves a very small surviving population, not enough to actually replace the population lost and not have genetic problems, considering Vault 101 is the only vault with a viable surviving population, and the Overseer predicts genetic breakdown in 1-2 generations. It doesn't seem 'good' for the Enclave to kill the non-Feral ghouls simply because they have had severely bad luck. Not all ghouls eventually turn Feral, Carol has existed as a ghoul since the weeks just after the Great War. They won't reproduce to spread their severe brand of mutation, why kill needlessly? As shown in Broken Steel, the death is quite painful. It won't end the stream of Ghouls anyway, there is still lots of radiation. It'll just slaughter, although deformed, fully conscious and intelligent humans.
It also kills all irradiated creatures. Now, it may seem great to kill the mutant animals, but the problem is the non-mutant animals will never come back. All brahmin, mole rats, and even creatures that don't seem mutated like dogs and squirrels (because they are exposed to the outside air) would be dead. This eliminates all supplies of meat, and will probably kill the irradiated plants like Mutfruit too. Sure everyone could eat the vegetables that Li is making in Rivet City...but everyone who knew about her hydroponics work would be dead. Eden's scientists wouldn't be able to figure it out, they can't even figure out how to bypass a simple keypad. This leaves no food for very few people, nothing but whatever pre-war scavenge is left. There seems to be a lot of it, but probably only enough for another generation or so, and a lot of it is in very dangerous areas.
As for Super Mutants, the Lone Wanderer was able to discover their source in Vault 87, with this information the Brotherhood of Steel would be able to defeat them anyways. We don't even know if Super Mutants need much water, if any. We know they're immune to all diseases (which for all we know could INCLUDE Eden's modified FEV) and death by aging, who's to say they aren't immune to dehydration. Eden's new FEV destroys mutated creatures, but the Super Mutants have far more than regular radiation-caused mutations, they have a new DNA structure that never existed in the natural world. Where's the evidence this virus would be able to target that?
If Eden's plan is carried out, it may eliminate mutated genes from the genetic stock, but in doing so he destroys Wasteland's population, their scientific progress, and their food supply. Also, because the radiation won't actually be all gone, the 'new' wasteland denizes will become 'exposed to mutation' soon enough, and the FEV will still be there to kill them too, thus in the long term Eden has accomplished nothing but total annihilation. Even Autumn, who despite coldly killing one of the Project Purity scientists, still has the humanity to know that eliminating the Capital Wasteland with FEV is not the intelligent decision. However, Autumn would still have the Wasteland ruled under iron-fist dictatorship, wiping out anyone who won't subjugate to them.
Therefore, I support the Brotherhood, the side that isn't pro-genocide. The person who started the thread I originally posted in wanted to have a 'debate' about it, but he never responded. Maybe we'll have actual discussion here.