Aiming for, and pleasing your public is something different than aiming at a as wide as possible audience.
It is, but that isn't really the point I was trying to make. What I was trying to say is that the aim of an artist
whatever it may be is irrelevant in the end; whether you aim at a wide audience or at a specific audience isn't an impediment or a help to achieve something artistic (trying to please a specific audience can end up with fan service, for instance). Something designed to be a product can be art, and many works of art were purely motivated by money. Some artists are commissioned to make something specific; some have to design advertisemants; some have to aim at a wide audience; some aim at a niche audience.... and in all these cases, something "artistic", something that strikes a cord can come out of it, even if it is not the primary goal. It really doesn't matter the circumstances, the motivations, the restrictions... it will just pop out of nowhere if it has to.
So the restriction here is that it has to aim for as broad an audience as possible. It is a kind of censorship if you want to see it this way (some subjects are off limits to avoid the AO ratings, some things have to be made simpler to appeal to more people). These are restrictions to be sure, but I still don't see why something artistic couldn't come out of it. Art can come out of much worse situations, and it has in history. In fact, I would even argue that restrictions have often heped art to blossom but I won't go into that. Suffice to say that some of the very best French movies were made during the WWII occupation despite a very strict censorship. I know it may be weird to come up with this example, but what I mean is that compared to that the restrictions put on Bethesda are ridiculously light. They still have a lot of freedom in what they're doing and nothing really stopping them from achieving something artistic (which is not necessarily the same as doing what they want, by the way).
Anyway, I think it's best to just agree to disagree on that one. I don't see their aim at a wider audience as a problem here, but you do. Oh well :shrug: