In the intro video they are giving the player (not the character) background lore to what the game is essentially going to be about. They call the character a prisoner. There's no room for lies, there's no decision made by the player, or the player character. It's just pure unadvlterated lore.
The only reason I can think that you are even arguing is that you have an ulterior motive. To me I don't really care about tradition, or which game had a "better" intro, I just can't understand how somebody is going to ignore the facts right in front of their face.
Except the video does not hold any water in regard of the PC as a prisoner, not to mention it can be skip. Also, I doubt that video is really classified as lore as its more of an introduction rather than the whole main quest. Also, do ya still remember the term "Prisoner in my own body" I mention earlier? It can mean anything. Hell, ya could been a prisoner of hearing Picard singing and ya wanna get out but doing so get ya kill for being disrespectful.
What I am saying is that it is not absolute. There are more than meets the idea and how one see through rather than just say ya are. If ya think that the PC was truly a prison, then that ya idea, not mines.
If any motives, its these two:
* To tell players that the prison intro is not and will not be a tradition of the Elder Scroll
* Open people minds that the Prison Intro isn't the only way to go for the future. Rather, destroy it, burn it, and dump it in a volcano and actual suggest a better opening intro that can fit to all background.
That's not true. Don't you remember.
In Morrowind jiub says, "i think i heard them say they're going to let us go." or something like that.
And the guards aren't all happy. They're calling you scum and saying don't try anything funny.
"Are we there yet?"
"No, sleep until we get there. And eat ya god dam muffin!"
To add that, they I never recall
those guards calling ya scum at all. Ya probably in another city.