I HAD intended to follow that, but seeing how everyone else was equipped i somewhat followed what they did.
Eventually i do intend to be a bit more realistic though. If anyone watches REALISTIC war movies, most of the infantry has the appearance they maybe threw on some medievel hockey padding, possibly a helmet, grabbed their weapons and shields and went to war.
I was also thinking though, the Vikings couldn't have been THAT rich, and %99 of them wore hauberks and Iron(Maybe steel?) helmets.
Hell, even Steppe Nomads had chainmail.
And for everyone who thinks that pretty much all professional soldiers wield swords, incorrect. There could be someone with full armor, and an axe. Axes are simply cheaper, and require different techniques to wield.
I just had a thought, maybe this could have been why middle eastern regions could field more soldiers than a western region the same size? (I think they had larger armies when compared this way.)
Middle eastern armies tended towards much less armor, and with "knights" wearing mail instead of plate.
Steel has actually been around for a very long time. Anglo-Saxons made their weapons out of steel.
99% of Vikings isn't that much when you factor in that a raiding party wasn't that large compared to a full-blown army, and that most of them were from scavenge.
Steppe (Russian, not Turkish) Nomads were more fond of Lamellar armour. Byzantine Lamellar was actually stronger than a mail hauberk, and it's components were cheaper. However, the skill required for the Byzantines to make that kind of armour was pretty large.
Heck, a padded gambeson is actually pretty tough. It does wonder to protect against blunt weapon. Though piercing and edged weapons it suffers.
Then also most warfare was conducted with Routier companies, rather than standing armies which didn't appear till the late middle ages, so those mercenaries had plenty of times to scavenge armor from fallen opponents, or buy armor for themselves with the loot from sacking cities and such, which happened quite often. If mail was so cheap, then knights wouldn't have to haved turned to banditry if they lost their armor.
But this is also Tamriel. Natural resources are likely more prevalent since magick provides a weapon that doesn't need smithing. The culture is also more advanced, which lends to the fact that guardsmen are well-armoured.
It's all very contradictory, so I just suggest people use their best judgment and limit themselves according to their holdings. Dwynnen I've made one of the poorest and backwater regions in High Rock, which reflects into my military.