» Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:55 am
I'm very, very sceptical about the spellmaking. It's not something I do very often, but it's fun to do and something thats neat to have. Removing it would alienate a large part of their fanbase. My oppinion is that it's a misstranslation.
Also, I think people seem to overreact way too much. There was one person who was really happy about a magazine calling a city "A dunmer city". Basing his happiness on a silly comment made from someone who saw that they adressed dunmers as dark elves in the area where you see what race you are, and therefore coming to the conclusion that they're no longer calling them dun/alt/bos/orismers anymore. Ignoring the fact that this is how it's been for atleast two games before Skyrim.
The biggest fault with the oblivion map wasn't it's size, it was the feeling of everything being the same everywhere and caves/ruins being more or less the same. I think they have the capabilities to make Skyrim fun with an oblivion-sized world too, plus the mountains wich will hopefully (And probably) be much more fun than Oblivions.
I liked the classystem, but I didn't really pay attention to it. I imagined my characters histories on my own, without the classes. I don't even remember wich class I chose for most of them. Same with birthsigns.
The fact that theres fewer skills did disappoint me in the beginning, but then I read about the perksystem and thought that might be kinda fun. They don't seem to have removed any skill without any good reason for it, and I'll judge it when I see it.
I'm also not sure where the "We can't combine two spells in one hand, now the game is destroyed!" comes from. We've never been able to do that in mid-combat and I'm not sure how easy it'll be to implent it. But here people are whining like it's something that makes the series. And I'm also sure that they can make a fun and innovating game without this combining of spells you could just cast one after another anyway.
One of the craziest complaints must be the graphics. We've seen a few screens with, im my oppinion, awesome graphic. Now, I'm not one that thinks graphics are the most important aspect of gaming, atleast not on its own. I love a visually beautiful game just as much as everyone else, but I'd rather have a really fun game with the graphics being a little worse, than a boring one with awesome graphics. Oblivion, for example, was a fun game but a bit too focused on graphics. "They tried a little too hard to impress us" as someone once said.
When it comes to NPCs I'm not sure what the complaint is either. If the only thing a person has to say are rumours, is it really that bad then that we can't open a conversation-tree with them?
I remember people complaining about Oblivion too. It does have its flaws, and at times they become rather blatant, but it's a fun game and I still play it from time to time,. And please don't burn me on a stake for saying that Morrowind also had its fair share of flaws. The combat comes to mind.
I think the problem isn't as much with the game as some people think it is (Ofcourse, it is to some extend). It's that some people seem to think they're entitled to the best game ever every time they hear about a new one. I've seen the word "Demand" in one thread-title. I've heard of people who've refused to play a game because multiplayer only had 9 vs. 9! Yes, we all want bethestda to make a good game, and in my oppinion it seems like they will make a rather normal game. With "normal" in this case meaning a fun game with flaws. It has the potential to be an awesome game with flaws. But it will NOT be an awesome game without flaws. I've actually laughed at some of the complaints and "demands" people on this forum has had. Alot of people do make mature, good posts, but some sound like the developers has failed us if they don't bring exactly everything they want.