We see this reoccurring theme throughout Fallout where Synths are becoming more and more intelligent, acquiring, what Father refers to as, “Free Will.” IE, the ability to come to conclusions independent of their programming. Father states in one of your first interviews with him, “The superior synth mind and body attempting to wrestle with something approaching free will can be a recipe for chaos”. To which the character responds, “If the synths are intelligent and self aware, then they have a right to free will.” Father, naturally disagrees, and proceeds to tell you that the creators of this technology know what is best for it.
But this prompts us to ask a very telling question… what, exactly is free will, and can human intelligence create an intelligence which surpasses that of the creator itself?
Let’s start with the first question. WHAT IS free will? If it is their ability to arrive at conclusions which escape the cause and effect of their innate programming, then we know this to be an impossibility. All circuitry and algorithmic deductions MUST follow the causal implications of their origin, otherwise what are their decision models predicated on? Magic? Chaos? Randomness? In other words, how could a robot have a THOUGHT which wasn’t allotted for in its source code?
The point is, if all of their decision-models are based off of a specific electronic calculus which produces inevitable results, then they do not have free will. This, however does not preclude their right to…. well, rights. We have to ask ourselves, how are we ANY DIFFERENT? Simply for the fact that we base our decision modeling off of an ORGANIC calculus as opposed to a COMPUTATIONAL calculus?
After all, what is a thought? Is it something we choose to have, or something which is the end result of a chemical catalyzation that has been ongoing since the moment of our birth? There is the famous Descartian phrase, “Cogito ergo sum”-- I think therefore I am. Well, the truth of the matter is, a thought doesn’t come when WE wish, it comes when IT wishes. A thought doesn’t materialize out of smoke and fairy dust, it is a flare of synapses and neurons that operate under VERY SPECIFIC laws of cause and effect. Much like… well, a robot.
In the case of Nick valentine, we see him pose to us the dilemma of his existence. He tells us early on that he struggles with the meaning of his life, being as he was modeled to have the thoughts, opinions, values and characteristics off of a “Nick Valentine” from a popular television show. We see a certain existential crisis occurring-- demarcating that, If anything, this particular strain of nihilism is a true mark of what it means to be human. To doubt, to feel, to think and to ascribe value to the nature of his particular experiences.
So again, we have to ask ourselves: simply because Nick has been programmed to have these particular sentiments, are they any less valid than our own? Are we not ourselves creations of a randomized molecular process which acts out according to a very particular input? Are not our thoughts and feelings a result of an ancient, primordial code that we have no control of? Does this fact unentitle us to our feelings, our needs, and our right to pursue love, life and happiness?
So, in summation, The Institute appears to be an almost narcissistic manifestation of man’s vision of himself as a God, as something separate from the technology it has created. But, ultimately, the synths are a product of collaboration. A collaboration between the best and brightest minds this post-nuclear world could muster. Every synth has in it the functionality of faceted genius, not derived from a single human source, but from MULTIPLE SOURCES that exemplify the best of mankind-- this does not mean that their creations are infallible, or void of negligent reasoning, but it SURELY does not mean it’s human counterparts are individually capable of better decision modeling in themselves, or that, as Father asserted, “They know what’s best for their creations.”