Hello! Unfortunately English is not my native language, so I use Google translator. I would like to comment on the Fallout New Vegas. Fallout 3 was present in the atmosphere of hopelessness and despair. People do not live, they survived, dying every day from dozens of raids raiders, slavers, super mutants and wild animal wastes.

No bullets, no clothes, no food, no water, no weapons. NO HOPE. The remains of the old world destroyed and rotten lie in ruins. Wild Wasteland captured wildlife, cities captured raiders and super mutants. IT - a real atmosphere of post-apocalyptic games. This is a real atmosphere of Fallout series of games! And what we see in New Vegas?

People relax in hovels svcking beer watching television. And this in the wastelands. We're not talking about himself Vegas. People live fatter than now. They play, get drunk and [censored]. I spent 193 hours on the passage of Fallout 3, you really managed to make each piece unique game. But Vegas - what is it? This is not Fallout! People are satisfied and mostly happy.

Please, please, do not run after stupid kids, do not feed their patients needs. Do what we should do, do Fallout! I'm not asking to make a game for a narrow circle of people, so you have nothing to sell. But do not ruin a series of chasing money and turn the game into MW3. Who killed a lot of series of games. Max Payne, Bioshock, COD, Diablo. The list is pretty big.

I ask you one thing - do not kill the Fallout in the pursuit of the interests of the stupid evil children whose only desire - to smash someone's skull. Have an opinion and make the next Fallout game of all time, which would eclipse the previous parts. Fallout can not be making it to die in the next shooter for the entertainment of children. Do not kill the Fallout

Regards Fallout fan from Russia

First, Bethesda didn't make New Vegas. Obsidian did.

And New Vegas is far closer to Fallout 1 + 2 in it's subject of humanitys survival and rebuilding. Fallout 3 was the one inconsitent to the series.

And Fallout 3 is the one that turned the series into a 'shooter' first. New Vegas brought back some of the RPGness.

I am only talking about the atmosphere

The irony of this is that Fallout 3 had a lot more combat, dungeon crawling and shooter atmosphere than what New Vegas had yet he is complaining that New Vegas is the one breaking the formula and catering to the entertainment of people who just want to shoot stuff.

"But Vegas - what is it? This is not Fallout!"
Actually it is, it's more so than Fallout 3. Cause in case you didn't know, from Fallout 1 to 2 to Van Buren to New Vegas we've seen the world evolving and becoming somewhat more stablized. That is Fallout. Having the world evolve and not constantly trudge around in a cliché post apocalyptic setting which never shows any signs of progress. Fallout 3 even goes so far as to still have pre-war food in grocery stores. It's been 200 freaking years! So Fallout 3 feels as if it takes place 20 years after the bombs, whereas New Vegas actually feels like it takes place 204 years after the bombs.

rofl the Irony indeed
yea of course you are... i'll tell you what, i'll ignore thread you created because you were cheated out of the thing fallout New Vegas is known for, Story. Obviously your Russian "said so yourself" and you are unable to comprehend or figure out whats actually going on.. you cant listen to the dialog or figure out what the hell is happening. Everyone is not "sipping on beer and watching tv" infact everyone is struggling and pooping the bed trying to figure out who should run new vegas

while you play Fallout 3 you Litterally dont have to listen to the dialog, the red dots show you what to kill and the map marker shows you were to go. Fallout 3 just has to look pretty and has plenty of people to kill to keep you entertained doesn't ?

Fallout New Vegas is about human progression and moral struggles , Fallout Three is about exploring the cool destroyed city of DC infested with plenty of Bad guys and Mutants to kill

Now tell me which one sounds more Childish? actually no i cant really blame you for liking fallout 3 more, like i said "sight" you cant understand the writing like us english speakers could so eh... your probably lost and wondering the desert killing everything you see like a mindless ape

stumbled against the vultures

I think your Google translator broke.

Okay?

Actually the point of the OP is that fallout 3 is more of a post apocalyptic setting simply because of the despair and hopeless circumstances so the fact that it sometimes feels like 20 years after the bombs fell would be a bonus for the OP.

I know that was part of his point, and I responded to that point as well as the ironic 2nd point.
The thing I'm criticizing about his post is that he says that New Vegas isn't Fallout because it's not like Fallout 3 with it's atmosphere.
Which is just false as Fallout 3 is the odd one out in the franchise.

One advice for the OP when translating in google translate, first translate Russian - English and then back English - Russian to see if it makes sense what you are trying to translate.

I do not disagree with you I just try to follow the logic of the OP. I guess the real fallout for the OP is fallout 3.

Alternatively, and this is going to take far longer but will produce vastly superior results: Get better at English.

The films I watch are english.
The television I watch is generally english.
The games I play are english.
The internet sites I go to are in english.
The music I listen to is generally english.

The more you expose yourself to that language the faster you'll learn it.


"I do not disagree with you I just try to follow the logic of the OP. I guess the real fallout for the OP is fallout 3."

I know I'm gonna come off as an ass but: He's wrong then.
The real Fallout will always be Fallout: A Post-Nuclear Role-Playing Game.
None of the sequels are the real Fallout. http://www.lonelyreviewer.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/highlander_connor.jpg

You never lived in Russia, you cannot compare Sweden to Russia, please have some understanding.

They have tv, music, films and internet in Russia so I don't see how I can't compare it.
Maybe they don't have "as much" english media in Russia, but that doesn't mean they don't have any.
And if they have english media I don't see why it would stop a russian from learning it.
Especially considering it's a universal language; It could be useful to learn.