Which is exactly what I said. Curling never even pretends that the virus seeks out "pure-humans", nor does Richardson; hell he says as much that anyone can be successfully innoculated - as we see in-game.
So I don't understand your point on Enclave propaganda giving how it is never once said by anyone in Fallout 2 that pure-humans are safe - that's the whole reason that the Enclave created a vaccine in the first-place; seems like a pretty obvious and immediate conclusion, not this un-founded evil Enclave, nazi dictatorship, propaganda story. If it requires such a [censored] justification in the first place then why would it be done?
EDIT: Thanks for taking the time to read my post, I won't "see above" because I was in complete agreement that the Curling-13 in no-way "tracks" pure-humans, though for more legitimate and logical reasons than just "the Enclave is evil and therefore lies to it's own people." Vice President Bird is regarded as a "National Hero" because he was one of the first volunteers for the vaccine human trials. There is no grand lie, as much as that might disappoint you.
Where is the evidence to say that "pure-human" is an artificial construct? The Master didn't think so when humans who had lived in Vaults and been exposed to less radiation reacted differently to the FEV that wastelanders. Pretty clear indication of some difference if you ask me. All that "Prime Normal", "Tell us where your Vault is", the whole plot of Fallout 1 really gives creedance to actual differences between wastelanders and "pure-humans" - a term never used by the Enclave anyway if I recall, it was humans and "near-humans". "Pure-humans" was probably just coined so people could argue a largely un-founded Nazi similarity - despite the obvious differences in motivation and basic ideology.
Not that the Project is based on some seething racial hatred anyway, it's an incorrect and stupid act of self-preservation on the Enclave's part. The whole racial arguement is used by people who either don't look into things or so blinded by bias that every-other reason is just lies and Enclave propaganda.
The human/near-human dichotomy is even worse than the pure human/human version, so you're actually strengthening my argument.
As for the rest: the Master didn't create any abstract human/near-human division for purely propaganda purposes. The "prime normal" moniker was reserved for normal humans who provided prime stock for creating mutants, namely had a higher likelihood of succesfully undergoing mutation. The key here was radiation count. Not radiation-induced damage to DNA (as the FEV comes pre-loaded with its own), but radiation count. Consult the timeline.
Now, the Enclave. I don't know why you claim that the Enclave isn't inherently evil. They are a band of raiders, granted, with technology, weapons and armor, but raiders nonetheless. Maybe, in the early years, they were composed of actual government members and elected representatives, but by 2242, they are a bunch of usurpers
claiming to be the United States government.
However, they are not. They have absolutely no legitimacy, due to the lack of constitutional mandate given to them by US citizens. And before you ask, no, Enclave members aren't the only United States citizens. The US Constitution clearly states that citizenship is obtained at birth or through naturalization. A majority of wastelanders in post-nuclear North America are descended from US citizens, making them citizens as well. Even IF the Enclave was (due to a continuity of operations act or something similiar) the legal US government, then the extrajudicial killings commited on US citizens on the mainland, trafficking in slaves and drugs, and finally, conspiring to commit total genocide against mankind, including a large number of US citizens, make it criminal and illegal.
And Enclave's plan for total genocide is entirely based on its racial doctrine:
It's tiny mocking minds like yours that prove the superiority of real humans over mutants.
The only way for true humans, and democracy, to be safe is to cleanse the mutants from the globe. We humans will take back that which is rightfully ours.
Never. Part of the president's job is to make the tough decisions. A lot of near-humans will sacrifice their lives for the return of humanity. Humans will prevail.
Now tell me how exactly is Enclave's logic any different from the racial doctrines of the Third Reich? Both base on the assumption that a certain group (Aryans/Enclave members) is superior and requires the removal (or, better, extermination) of lesser people for their success.
If anything, you're blinded by your love for the Enclave that you miss glaringly obvious facts about their operations.