Don't ask me pal, I'm not an American. IRL US has drilled plans - on a Presidential Level - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84 - presumably as long as it would take too return to proper operations I suppose.
Which royally pisses off Congressmen and US citizens. The fact that drills are run doesn't mean that the Constitution would be ultimately suspended - or that these plans actually call for it. If you want to argue, then show a link to a declassified Continuity of Operations plan where it is explicitly stated that the Constitution is to be suspended indefinitely. Don't link Wikipedia as an argument.
Unfortunately there is little evidence to suggest that Autumn acted with any support from the people at all. Eden aptly says the following:
"Many people are content with a reassuring voice of authority, and never question the lack of public appearances."
How could Autumn organise any kind of rebellion when Eden can see everything in Raven Rock? Really it's more likely that the people assumed that President Eden had been taken to a safe location and Autumn had assumed command whilst an armed terrorist prowled the base. We hear that Eden later supports the troopers at the Purifier - and in Broken Steel Raven Rock continues to exist for another 2 weeks after the Purifier - and Dr Li also mentions that some sabotage has taken place on the Purifier when she's talking to you over the intercom at the end (you see my point, some troops down their took it upon themselves to sabotage stuff down there.
You seem to forget that Enclave troopers in Raven Rock had no trouble breach a Presidential order to permit the Vault 101 Kid free passage through the base when Autumn simply ordered them to ignore it and kill:
"Attention! This is Colonel Autumn! You are hereby ordered to ignore the President's previous directive. The prisoner from Vault 101 is to be shot on sight. I repeat, shot on sight. This is an order!"
So, any claims of Enclave soldiers recognizing Eden's authority are baseless. As the game clearly shows, they only follow Eden's order as long as Autumn agrees with them. It's kind of a no-brainer: any soldier will follow a tangible commander, rather than a President he never saw (Bethesda's schizophrenic writing nonwithstanding).
That's the problem: Fallout 3's writing is schizophrenic. Eden is inconsistently portrayed as both Eden's opponent AND supporter, at the same time. Enclave soldiers in turn are written and designed as brainless mooks dying with Eden's name on their lips, despite the fact that they have no problem ignoring his orders when their tangible commander tells them to.
Hardly. We know that Eden gained sentience on his own and built his personality from studying historical archives, and how does creating Eden justify them? We do know however that the Oil Rig was connected to numerous US Facilities through Eden and that decades after the war orders were coming from somewhere to go to the West Coast.
I am not trying to forgive the Enclave of any crimes; just saying that they thought that they were doing good from their massively isolated position, thought that they were saving the human race. That's their motivation, not psuedo-Nazi racial genocide because they are the Master Race.
You do realize that I am referring to the pseudo-scientific artificial human/nearhuman division coined by the Enclave, right?
I am sure that the Nazis thought they were doing the best for humanity too. Subjective evaluation of a given action does not absolve anyone from guilt. Especially not bastards planning to kill every surviving human in the world based on fabricated pseudo-scientific evidence.
There are genetic differences between Europeans, Americans, Africans, Asians and Australians. That doesn't make any of them more or less human, just different human types. If there really were significant genetic differences, enough for wastelanders to be an entirely different species despite having an identical phenotype, do you think Charles Curling's fragile human/near human construct would fall so easily after pointing out that wastelanders are just a different type of human than he and the rest of the Enclave?
Autumn was hardly even completely opposed to Eden, his own words:
[Speech] “Why are you doing this? Why give your allegiance to a machine?”
“I am sworn to protect the Presidency. The chain of command must be upheld. I wouldn’t expect you to understand.”
“Eden betrayed you. See this vial? He trusts me more than he trusts you.”
“That’s not true. That plan was abandoned months ago. He would never go behind my back!”
“But you know he has. He sent me to do a job that you wouldn’t.”
“You could have stolen the vial… it means nothing. It proves nothing.”
“You know I’m telling the truth. Eden, the Enclave… both have betrayed you.”
“I am in charge here! I am the Enclave!”
“If you’re in charge, then you can stop the plans of some mad machine.”
“Stop? Now? Are you out of your mind? There’s nothing else to be done. We will push forward, and we will prevail!”
Guy seems to be under the impression that he's aiding Eden's cause, even to the point that he's in denial over Eden ever betraying him. My own explaination is that he never wanted to depose Eden just make him "see things his way"; it's likely that they had a more complex relationship than what we see. Ultimately - as far as I am concerned - Autumn got everyone under his command killed for seemingly nothing, doomed the Enclave and has the sheer balls to want to "leave in dignity" if you convince him that the Enclave betrayed him; I don't think Eden is great shakes either mind you.
If anyone killed the Enclave, it's Bethesda's bad design and aforementioned schizophrenic design. And the Brotherhood's aggression, justified by Li's "[The Enclave controls the Purifier.] It's just wrong!" As for Autumn not opposing Eden:
"I'm not entirely sure Eden can be trusted. And I think he knows I don't trust him. But I don't think he knows I have the emergency destruct sequence for his console. "Priority Override, Authorization code 420-03-20-9" and... boom. It'd have to be a last resort, of course, but at least the option is there."
And you seem keen on adopting one particular interpretation of his words. Ever consider that Autumn is surprised to find himself outwitted by a personality simulation he thought he had bested? He even outright states that HE is the Enclave. Of course, we ARE basing this entire argument on Bethesda's evidently poor storytelling and writing.
See above, we know that Eden gained sentience and built his own personality; your just trying to find a way to discredit it as a source. You could go further and say that the Enclave programmed Eden to think that he did it all himself but in that vein I could argue that any number of Constitutional changes and Emergency Powers make the Enclave legitimate. There's only so much in-game infomation.
Why would the Enclave even programme a sentient machine on the other coast? What would be the point? Eden says he relayed communications and that decades after the war surviving Government Installations were seemingly ordered to the West Coast; oh wait the Enclave made it all up, how convenient.
Uh, subverting existing governmental infrastructure instead of having to create everything from scratch sounds unlikely to you?
So who is going to discredit any territorial claim made by the Government? Who is going to enforce or oppose the US's taking
un-owned water? We know that no Nations oppoesd it at the time, hence why the Rig exists.
You'll have to forgive me for not knowing anything but I wouldn't have thought that the U.S. government claiming territory - may be illegal internationally - would be illegal within it's self. International Law meant nothing, remember the Nuclear War between the Middle East and Europe, whilst the UN still existed in the 2050's; that broke "international law" so are all those nations no-longer soverign.
I may be wrong but international treaties have been made and then broken again since the earliest forms of government. Given that your the one educated on the subject could you perhaps detail to me what parts of the U.S. Constitution state that claiming International Waters as Un-Constitutional and Illegal by U.S. Law - which is all that matters in this discussion as no nations currently exist in any form to accuse the U.S. of illegality, nor is their an International Court or an International anything. I am sure that the His Majesty's Government didn't recognise the U.S. sovreignity for a while but look where we are now.
International treaties exist based on mutual cooperation. Yes, they can be broken, but apparently you are a proponent of the rather primitive "Might Makes Right" rule. Sure, it sometimes does. But you seem to have missed how violations of international law (war) have led to humanity's downfall in late October 2077. Precisely because America and China thought that they might show that they're right through force.
The fact that the pre-war government ran what was essentially concentration camps for Chinese POWS and Chinese Americans as well as allowed for scientific experimentation to be performed on its citizens is really proof enough for me.
Although I can't prove it, I don't believe its logical to assume that in an alternate reality universe that the U.S. Constitution remains un-amended and unchanged from our own.
Indeed in many ways the pre-war government was just as bad if not worse morally than the Enclave in terms of what they did. Are they illegitimate as well? Is there no true U.S. Government in the Fallout Universe?
The US rounded up Japanese nationals during World War II in internment camps and experimented on its own soldiers (nuclear tests) as well. Bad calls and decisions made in violation of the Constitution were made, but in the interest of the US and her citizens. Enclave's decisions are made in the interest of a small, elitist group of citizens and serve to destroy the significantly larger population of US citizens on the mainland (starting with some 700,000 NCR citizens).
Oh I don't do I?
Yes Federal clearly states that any children of United States citizens receive citizenship. If you'll read the excerpt I posted, you'll notice that this is clearly addressed.
However, are the wastelanders citizens? No they aren't. Would a member of the NCR consider himself/herself to be an American Citizen? No they wouldn't. Would a member of the Brotherhood of Steel? No, they wouldn't.
Their parents were not U.S. citizens, they are not U.S. citizens, and they were not born in the United States ergo under current U.S. citizenship law they cannot be considered U.S. citizens. Because they can claim ancestry from individuals 200 years ago does not make them citizens or mean they have a right to citizenship.
Likewise simply because they were born in North America in what was once U.S. soil does not make them citizens, not at all.
And yes, a government is needed for citizenship to be valid. Americans (despite what some members of our country seem to believe) are not an ethnic group and you don't have "American blood." Citizenship in any nation is only valid if that nation still exists as a state. This goes for America as well.
Again, you missed the point. Successor states (such as the NCR) aren't a continuation of the USA. However, organizations (such as the Enclave) that CLAIM to be a direct continuation of the pre-War US government, in order to have any claim to legitimacy, are required to recognize the 2077 borders of USA and the entire common law system, including rules as to obtaining citizenship. You seem to fail to understand that citizenship is granted automatically to children of US citizens. If one is descended from US citizens and was born in US territory, no matter how much time has passed, he is an US citizens, regardless of whether or not he knows that.
This is how it works. The fact that you don't control the entire territory and can't enforce law effectively doesn't mean that it ceases to apply. It's a binary situation: either you estabilish yourself as the US government and continue its work, with all the duties it entails (Autumn wanted to) or you're just another band of raiders with fancy titles and better than average guns.
Exceedingly interesting arguments going on here...
I don't know what the point of this "citizenship" debate is, but I do know that it doesn't seem logical to assume you can be a citizen of a state you aren't aware exists and/or are actively rebelling from. Particularly if the state in question does not control the area you live in.
It is quite logical. Infants aren't aware that they were born and live in a particular state; does that mean they aren't citizens of said state? Rebels are also citizens; if they weren't, how would they be tried for treason? Citizenship is essential in prosecution.