I was responding to Nomad's post (he was not around under this id at the time) and others previous paw-prints:
Roaming Nomad
Joined: 3-August 08
Spears are very much so needed. The fewer types of weapons you have to choose from, the more menial the game becomes, and next thing you know we'll have a game with *just* blades and bows, then we suddenly loose everything that made the series the series in the first place. I mean really, I put *all* of it down to devs being lousy, LOUSY at what they're being paid to do (other than the fact that who knows, they might have just been misguided by their superiors the whole time, so no disrespect to anyone becuase making a game is horridly hard work, but it's just a matter of opinion). It's like somewhere after the phenomenal success of Morrowind, they all became greedy bastards and then this gaming company that had so much originality going for it turned into a [censored] Microsoft cooperation and figured the quicker they pumped out a new game they quicker they got their due, and that's not how things should work, yet nearly all gaming companies do it. It's a matter of quality AND quantity for TES, and I do condone Oblivion for having this impressive gameworld as a whole, it was repetitive for the most part, and less immersive than everyone would have liked. There were no real places of interest other than a few nice waterfalls. I just can't imagine what the artistic director of Oblivion thought he was doing. Perhaps it's just the wrong people in charge, but to be honest, I'd rather wait 5 years and get a game that will be forever crushed into my memory then wait 3 years and get something that will make you wonder what was happening that whole time.
EDIT: And don't feed me any of that 'Oh well YOU try being a dev, etc etc' crap, becuase it IS what I want to do, and I want to deliver.
What are you talking about? They own the forum.
Are you sure you're not just too quick to invent epic tales of repression?
:rofl: repression - you're a card paw-prints - business nubee maybe?
You do understand that corporations have to negociate bizzare and convolute agreements called contracts? Such proposals are finalised by lawyers - you know about lawyers? That is after department heads (technical and marketing), major stockholders, and accountants have all gotten together to decide where their cut is coming from? And also that consoles are in a relatively 'fixed format' - they avoid costs that PC manufacturers incur by not changing their basic structure for a decade or so. But on top of that they all have an 'image' that they manipulate to target various sections of the population and thus they make decisions based not only on the tastes of people who might buy one game, but rather on the tastes and likely reactions of people who normally buy all their other games too ... = individual developers have to fit in with that- even gamesas.
Umm what does 'they own the forum' have to do with anything anyone said? Maybe you would like to reassess your statement's lack of connnection to anything germaine?
Or were you making an unfounded accusation that someone was accusing gamesas Devs of flaming others? I can't see anything else in there. You're making one hell of an accusation against gamesas if that's the case paw-prints
If you had been following events in the run up to the Ob release then you might have noted that as the links with the consoles became stronger the flaming of fans that suggested alternatives to various development options increased exponentially - astounding and out of character given the nature of content by console players previous to that time. Now I always thought that this flaming was by console-oriented dummies who had never actually played ES and wanted another 'action' game rather than an RPG - your statement appears to suggest that it was the devs in disguise ... are you sure that was the impression you wanted to give - or did you misunderstand what was posted??