I'm not saying that Mede should fought on. What i'm saying is that he should of tried to negotiate a more fair treaty instead of the one he got right now. Surely the Domnion's military has been weakened allot since the Red Ring incident?
I'm certain it was weakened considerably. But I'm not sure if we know what the Dominion's conditions were for bargaining. If the Medes offered to treaty, and the Dominion insisted on receiving nothing less than their prewar demands, then Mede didn't really have a choice. He could have fought on, or he could have come to the peace table. Fighting on may have brought him a better treaty, but the risks - as I described above - were really quite great. So in this particular case Mede wouldn't be at fault. The Thalmor, by not bargaining down, successfully bluffed Mede. And even if Mede
knew this, he really didn't have much of a choice to do anything about it.
Now if Mede approached the Thalmor by offering them all of their prewar demands, then yes it would have been entirely his fault.
I can't follow you here.
If Mede would have kept Hammerfell in the Empire he would have had to help the Dominion to conquer it?
Hm?
Sure. He was under obligation by political treaty to hand Hammerfell over to the Dominion. Since Hammerfell did not cooperate, they were essentially in open rebellion against the Empire. So the Empire would have been obliged to use force to subdue Hammerfell and turn it over to the Dominion. If they didn't, the Thalmor could accuse them of not only failing to fulfill their obligations, but of actually aiding and abetting the Redguard cause against the Thalmor. Instead, Mede ejected Hammerfell from the Empire completely, thereby removing any obligation by the Empire to turn the province over to the Dominion.