Terms are important, though, because of what they imply. Sithis is extremely hostile to the 'nothing'- 'stasis' here has negative implications. Come to think of it, the Sithis of Sithis is almost an anti-Tao. I'd say the same for most merish beliefs, actually- one thing all mer seem to have in common is that they can't just let things be.
That is part of the point some of the posters have been trying to make, however - words have connotations that are dangerous.
"Killing", "Murdering", "Executing", "Slaying", "Releasing from his/her/its misery" are words that describe the same act, but have radically different connotations, but those are connotations that we, as perceivers of that act place upon the act. It has no bearing upon the objective truth of the act, itself.
To let our perceptions of the connotations of words color our perception of the objective facts of what Anu and Padomay actually are.
To say that Anu and Padomay ARE Tao, you can use that as a new perspective from which to view these concepts, but at the same time, shifting your perspective does nothing to change the objective facts of what Anu and Padomay actually are, and believing that they will somehow conform to his change in perspective is a mistake.
It is, ultimately, best to remain entirely objective, without thought for the connotations - "Murder" and "Mercy Killing" are the same act objectively, regardless of your feelings of the connotations, and should be viewed in the same light by those who wish to remain objective - but that it is often difficult for people to do so, and as such, shifting one's thought to multiple perspectives at least prevents one from becoming too attached to any one perspective.