No...she created a prophecy that was supposed to result in the Tribunal's demise. Ulterior purpose or not, it's still a part of the prophecy.
Shoving the manifestation of his dike into her mouth IS horrible (to some; not me), but you're making it seem as if he cut a hole in her throat and pissed in it or something; she's et'ada: she'll be fine.
Shoving the manifestation of his dike into her mouth IS horrible (to some; not me), but you're making it seem as if he cut a hole in her throat and pissed in it or something; she's et'ada: she'll be fine.
:lol:
Well, I wouldn't say that the demise of the Tribunal is a bad thing. Of course, the Tribunal won't see it like that, but it's for the better, I think. No mortal should have the kind of power in the Heart - absolute power corrupts absolutely, and all that.
I guess what I'm wondering is whether or not she would have intervened during the whole Landfall thing, if it weren't for Vivec's actions. Did he do something that impaired her ability to manifest in the Mundus? Or, did his actions sour her toward the Dunmer such that she's like "Well, fine, if your friggin' leader is going to flip me the bird, I'll do the same to y'all, too." Minus the colloquial phrases and southern accent.
Even if she doesn't genuinely care about the Dunmer as people, the absence of the Tribunal's influence means she can reassert her presence in the pantheon of Daedra worship by the Dunmer. Therefore, it seems to me like helping the Dunmer through the Landfall crisis might benefit her as well. I could be totally wrong, but it seems possible she'd be inclined to be the new 'savior.' Did Vivec think this as well (he must have known Lie Rock would fall in his absence)? Did his actions prevent Azura from helping the Dunmer during that crisis? And if he knew all that, then 1) why didn't he do anything to mitigate the crisis, 2) if he decided not to help the Dunmer, he seems to have made darn sure that no higher power could help them either.