Actually the title says "50's theme?", "it all." is in fact a very dissimilar combination of words. A less literal interpretation might lead one to assume that by "it all." you are referring to everything that ever was, is, or will be, which is paradoxically impossible. This title may also disturb some, as titles do not usually say anything at all, as few have ever had working mouths, and the idea of a title capable of speech could be rather frightening to some. A fourth interpretation would have the reader assume that by "it all." you mean that the title says all that needs to be said, which is somewhat more contextually pertinent, but in this case, the title itself would be lacking. It seems that only 1 out of 4 likely interpretations would make any sense at all, meaning that this original post of yours is a 3rd rate one at best. May I constructively suggest a re-phrasing?