» Tue May 08, 2012 9:31 am
One of the strengths of the Elder Scrolls saga has been that it allows for moral ambiguity and complexity. That's generally been the case with the portrayal of the Empire: in most respects, it is a human institution of a familiar pattern, with positive and negative aspects to it. It usually looks like it is, overall, a good thing, but one can easily imagine intelligent, principled people siding for it or against it.
In TES II: Daggerfall, the player character is, initially, an agent personally loyal to the Emperor; you can ultimately choose to side with or against the Empire. In TES: Redguard, the protagonist leads a rebellion against the Empire.
In TES III: Morrowind, we get a long look at the issue of colonialism: the Empire represents a cosmopolitan, universalizing morality, including at least a passive opposition to slavery, but we can also see the Empire as opportunistic, grasping, and insensitive to the internal complexities of the province. The Great House Hlaalu, which appears to be the most supportive of the Empire in Morrowind, proves to be corrupt and conspiratorial. The politics and social mores within Morrowind are quite complex, with a great deal of internal conflict; there's much to be admired or reviled.
TES IV: Oblivion was the exception, in portraying the Empire in an almost unambiguously positive light. There are two excuses for this: first, we're in the heart of the Empire, where you would expect ubiquitous support for the Empire; second, and more importantly, the crux of the Oblivion Crisis is the role of the Emperor and the Empire in reinforcing the integrity of the mortal world. So, one gets the sense that, flawed and imperfect the Empire may be as a human institution, its mythopoetic role is of overwhelming importance. We also get hints about how nasty some aspects of the origins of the Empire were, particularly if one closely reads the stories of Pelinal in the Knights of the Nine DLC.
In TES V: Skyrim, we've got the civil war. As it's set up, one can sympathize with either side. But the key thing about the civil war is that at one level, it appears to be a choice between (open) worship of Talos, and the survival of the Empire. But Talos is the god of the Empire; the two are linked, and choosing one without the other undermines both. And that's precisely why the Thalmor have engineered the whole crisis. Meanwhile, you've got issues of loyalty and tradition to sort out.