This just in... the "hard core" from the PC market just joined the "hard core" from the console market in revealing themselves to be entitled self-serving worthless little ****! Need proof? come here to the Crysis 2 forums! Where you can see literally thousands of threads talking about how the game svcks because you dont need a system built by nasa to run it, how bugs that aren't game enders and the normal gamer can run through without knowing it's a bug are game enders that ended the game, and how suddenly a series that was known to be svck at multiplayer before.... svcks at it now, but they are now suddenly pissed about it!

Seriously guys... you sound like XBOTS!

Crytek, you made a fun game... I don't agree with all your design choices, but overall, I've loved the hell out of this one... just like I did Warhead and MOSTLY did out of the original. Keep making FUN games and I'll stick with you. just... not for MP.

Having seen the same thing happen on Bungie.net, i'm inclined to agree.

Same here. The OP is brash but honest and true.

Need proof? come here to the Crysis 2 forums! Where you can see literally thousands of threads talking about how the game svcks because you dont need a system built by nasa to run it,

You shouldn't talk about "proof" unless you can prove something. Sure, there are some, but few actually whine only about too low system reqs. You may want to think all those thousands of posts are about the GFX, and while I do agree it's silly to complain only about GFX, it is most certainly not the only thing downgraded and complained about in this game.

You obviously like CoD style fun, but why take it for granted everyone else likes it, as it's completely different from FarCry and Crysis? I agree, C2 is fun DM MP, but we already have plenty of CoD clones and can easily see why some of Crysis fans would be disappointed.

Well some of the features we are asking for such as the unrestricted console and sandbox editor and better textures are really not that hard to put in.

It actually takes MORE time to optimize the textures and restrict the console. And as for the sandbox editor, they already have it but just haven't released it.

Mostly we are complaining about their broken promises. For example this: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/108709-Crysis-2-Is-a-PC-Game-First-Console-Game-Second-Claims-Crytek

I don't think I need to explain how that is at least misleading if not a complete lie.

Well some of the features we are asking for such as the unrestricted console and sandbox editor and better textures are really not that hard to put in.

It actually takes MORE time to optimize the textures and restrict the console. And as for the sandbox editor, they already have it but just haven't released it.

Won't be fixing the fact that SP gameplay is mostly a corridor shooter with ridiculous A.I soldiers randomly scattered on the roads. Very sophisticated. I mean, why the hell make an urban combat game if you can't really make it one? One of the greatest griefs for me is the gameplay. I expected something like in C1, korean squads hunting and ambushing me. This is a far cry from it.

The MP is like a good and more fun CoD game. No complaint there, excluding bugs, hacks and technical problems.

Mostly we are complaining about their broken promises. For example this: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/108709-Crysis-2-Is-a-PC-Game-First-Console-Game-Second-Claims-Crytek

I don't think I need to explain how that is at least misleading if not a complete lie.

This.

Oh yes, lets allow every game out there to become casual. No competition, no difficulty... lets keep the games nice and mediocre. Lets make promises and not keep them, and leave paying customers hanging after release. Lets also have a 6 hour single player campaign!

Great idea man. The gamers of the world would be so lucky to have you at the helm of the industry.

Sarcasm aside, you are retarded. People like you are the reason why games have degraded so much over time. Prime example, crysis 2. Another run of the mill, linear, casual shooter, that holds your hand throughout the game so you can never go wrong. Plus, all of the basic features we were promised arnt even in the game at release, and have gotten no communication on these features since. Great way to treat customers. Just because you are happy with a 6 hour casual single player experience for 60 bucks, doesnt mean the rest of the world has to be.

You are a disgrace.

He doesnt get when we mean by consolefied. When we say its consolefied we arent referring to it being a port. We are referring to the gameplay. How does the game play? Well if feels like it came from the a Console and has been streamlined because of it.

I'm pretty sure most of the threads are about bugs and hackers. Shoot, hardcoe gamers didn't buy this game because it's just a CoD clone (we all played the demo for 10 seconds and figured that out).

Regarding the texture threads, though... I mean... It is a Crytek game... People are bound to be disappointed if it doesn't push the boundries of what their system can do. This is the FIRST game Crytek's made that isn't hard to run.



There's a reason for all the "whining", and all the reasons are good reasons. Get over yourself, you're not entitled to having everyone agree with you and think this is the greatest game of all time.

" Players with a low-end PC could still enjoy the game - something that couldn't be said about the first Crysis - but those with the really powerful computers could turn everything up to maximum and see the fruits of their investment."

HAHAHA

dont need for the game to run on powerful computers, just want it not to be MAXIMUM CONSOLE. its clearly console limited. fun, but not amazing enough because pc gamers have seen better. After Crysis 1 we get this "pc game"? stop degrading pc games and dumbing it down!

before you say if you dont like the game then dont play it, i just like to say we care for the Crysis brand and hate to see it become generic.

Huh...could have sworn I've seen the OP post that same thing in another thread...need attention much?

Or maybe it's true and a lot of PC Gamers have serious entitlement issues.

Well i've been complaining because of the random crashes i've been getting, as have a lot of other people and Crytek haven't even acknowledged it as far as i've seen.

I love this game, the gameplay and everything about it - BUT I JUST WANT TO PLAY THE THING FOR MORE THAN 3 GAMES IN A ROW WITHOUT IT CRASHING TO DESKTOP.

This just in... the "hard core" from the PC market just joined the "hard core" from the console market in revealing themselves to be entitled self-serving worthless little ****! Need proof? come here to the Crysis 2 forums! Where you can see literally thousands of threads talking about how the game svcks because you dont need a system built by nasa to run it, how bugs that aren't game enders and the normal gamer can run through without knowing it's a bug are game enders that ended the game, and how suddenly a series that was known to be svck at multiplayer before.... svcks at it now, but they are now suddenly pissed about it!

Seriously guys... you sound like XBOTS!

Crytek, you made a fun game... I don't agree with all your design choices, but overall, I've loved the hell out of this one... just like I did Warhead and MOSTLY did out of the original. Keep making FUN games and I'll stick with you. just... not for MP.

You obviously wrote this to serve your own agenda you " self-serving worthless little ****!" Now STFU because 67 pages of WE WANT DX11 says to me that this is not a few self serving people trying to push through an unpopular suggestion as you are trying to convince people is the case.

This just in... the "hard core" from the PC market just joined the "hard core" from the console market in revealing themselves to be entitled self-serving worthless little ****! Need proof? come here to the Crysis 2 forums! Where you can see literally thousands of threads talking about how the game svcks because you dont need a system built by nasa to run it, how bugs that aren't game enders and the normal gamer can run through without knowing it's a bug are game enders that ended the game, and how suddenly a series that was known to be svck at multiplayer before.... svcks at it now, but they are now suddenly pissed about it!

Seriously guys... you sound like XBOTS!

Crytek, you made a fun game... I don't agree with all your design choices, but overall, I've loved the hell out of this one... just like I did Warhead and MOSTLY did out of the original. Keep making FUN games and I'll stick with you. just... not for MP.

You obviously wrote this to serve your own agenda you " self-serving worthless little ****!" Now STFU because 67 pages of WE WANT DX11 says to me that this is not a few self serving people trying to push through an unpopular suggestion as you are trying to convince people is the case.

You just proved his point. How does it feel?

This just in... the "hard core" from the PC market just joined the "hard core" from the console market in revealing themselves to be entitled self-serving worthless little ****! Need proof? come here to the Crysis 2 forums! Where you can see literally thousands of threads talking about how the game svcks because you dont need a system built by nasa to run it, how bugs that aren't game enders and the normal gamer can run through without knowing it's a bug are game enders that ended the game, and how suddenly a series that was known to be svck at multiplayer before.... svcks at it now, but they are now suddenly pissed about it!

Seriously guys... you sound like XBOTS!

Crytek, you made a fun game... I don't agree with all your design choices, but overall, I've loved the hell out of this one... just like I did Warhead and MOSTLY did out of the original. Keep making FUN games and I'll stick with you. just... not for MP.

You obviously wrote this to serve your own agenda you " self-serving worthless little ****!" Now STFU because 67 pages of WE WANT DX11 says to me that this is not a few self serving people trying to push through an unpopular suggestion as you are trying to convince people is the case.

You just proved his point. How does it feel?

If his point was that alot of people want DX11 so the game will look better on their systems or when they upgrade. Then I feel very happy about having proved that point.

I am not trying to win a popularity contest or accumulate any humanitarian awards for my contributions to the forum I just want DX11.

Anyone notice how it's actually the fanboys in denial who talk about GFX and DX11 the most, while blaming those who complain in general for doing that?

If his point was that alot of people want DX11 so the game will look better on their systems or when they upgrade. Then I feel very happy about having proved that point.

I am not trying to win a popularity contest or accumulate any humanitarian awards for my contributions to the forum I just want DX11.

But Crytek said a month before release, that the game would not have DirectX 11 at launch. How did people now hear this and claim it was a rumor?

Anyone notice how it's actually the fanboys in denial who talk about GFX and DX11 the most, while blaming those who complain in general for doing that?

Well you can't count what I said I'm just retalianting against the OP for saying "the "hard core" from the PC market just joined the "hard core" from the console market in revealing themselves to be entitled self-serving worthless little ****!"

Fact is few people if any complaining about anything on this forum are doing so primarily for altruistic reasons. Further if such people even exist then it pretty much follows that they cannot think of somebody in greater need than Crytek customers to focus their altruistic efforts on, how can I take such a persons opinion about anything seriously?

And since when did the customers opinions need to be altruistic to be valid? Unless you plan to buy products on an altruistic basis then opinions based on altruism are in fact less valid. Since they don't give as true a picture of what the customers really want.

If his point was that alot of people want DX11 so the game will look better on their systems or when they upgrade. Then I feel very happy about having proved that point.

I am not trying to win a popularity contest or accumulate any humanitarian awards for my contributions to the forum I just want DX11.

But Crytek said a month before release, that the game would not have DirectX 11 at launch. How did people now hear this and claim it was a rumor?

THEY NEVER SAID THAT!!!

This just in... the "hard core" from the PC market just joined the "hard core" from the console market in revealing themselves to be entitled self-serving worthless little ****! Need proof? come here to the Crysis 2 forums! Where you can see literally thousands of threads talking about how the game svcks because you dont need a system built by nasa to run it, how bugs that aren't game enders and the normal gamer can run through without knowing it's a bug are game enders that ended the game, and how suddenly a series that was known to be svck at multiplayer before.... svcks at it now, but they are now suddenly pissed about it!

Seriously guys... you sound like XBOTS!

Crytek, you made a fun game... I don't agree with all your design choices, but overall, I've loved the hell out of this one... just like I did Warhead and MOSTLY did out of the original. Keep making FUN games and I'll stick with you. just... not for MP.

So, were all supposed to be overjoyed to play a dumbed down version of COD, with bad graphics and huge errors?

You Sir, are a child.

I find it hilarious that everyone is comparing it to Call of Duty. Referring to it as a clone. It's like all the people calling any new MMO a WoW clone.

As if, following a successful and popular model was a BAD thing.

That's ignoring the fact the game has its similarities but they are worlds apart. CoD is a joke if you compared the competitive qualities of each game. Crysis has balance AND unique features. That's something that CoD lacks. It has random guns with very little difference and overpowered killstreaks. Also the last addition to CoD was received horribly. Black Ops? It's a "consolized" piece of trash. It isn't even optimized for the PC. I mean, it REALLY isn't optimized. You're complaining about nothing in the eyes of real gamers. There is no huge errors, stop making garbage up to try to exaggerate your point even more.

all u pc gamer elitist are just whining...............gameplay>>>>>graphics thats y I am playing pac man on my commodore 54................fCuk progress..............console ftw..........Yeah I want every game to be COD clone because anything other than that makes my head hurt. I would request crytek to make crysis 3 dx8 compatible.

/sarcasm

Well, I have to say that the game was not as hard or full of eye candy that I expected. When I heard about C2 coming out I upgraded my pc to handle just about anything they could come up with and found I did not need too. As far as the MP, I have never been the type that liked MP online games. I do hope that Crytek will go back to what they are good at and that is PC games. I would like to say that even though the game is not as good as I expected I do still like the game and I don't regret the purchase.